GLBE (GLBE)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 6.2 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics present a stark dichotomy between exceptional operational resilience and severe capital inefficiency. While the Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and Beneish M-Score of -2.91 signal robust financial health with minimal earnings manipulation risk, the return on invested capital (ROIC) of 5.9% falls significantly below the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 12.4%, creating a destructive spread that erodes intrinsic value over time. This inefficiency is evident in the DuPont decomposition: although net margins at 7.1% and gross margins near 45.3% are respectable, they are insufficient to offset high leverage or low asset turnover required to generate returns above the cost of capital. The Altman Z-Score of 6.2 confirms a strong balance sheet with negligible bankruptcy risk, yet the negative ROIC-WACC spread indicates that current operations actively destroy shareholder wealth despite these defensive metrics.
Valuation multiples reflect extreme market optimism detached from underlying cash flow generation mechanics. Trading at a forward P/E of 73.4x, the stock commands a premium vastly exceeding typical sector norms for companies failing to generate excess returns on capital. This pricing implies that investors are anticipating sustained acceleration in revenue growth—currently running at 27.8% year-over-year—to eventually normalize ROIC and justify current expectations. However, discounted cash flow analysis suggests a fair value of $44, indicating the market price likely overshoots intrinsic worth by assuming perpetual high-growth execution without addressing the structural capital misallocation evident in the negative spread. The disparity between the aggressive growth narrative and the destructive capital efficiency creates a significant valuation gap that must narrow before economic reality aligns with current equity prices.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 10.4% | 12.4% | 14.4% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $51 | $40 | $33 |
| 3% | $56 | $44 | $36 |
| 4% | $63 | $48 | $38 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=12.4%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $44 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like ARKF or SPDW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell GLBE shares regardless of GLBE's individual fundamentals. We estimate $12M of passive capital is structurally linked to GLBE through 2 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on GLBE's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in GLBE to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If GLBE (GLBE) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A (SHOP) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with GLBE. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
GLBE Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest GLBE Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 2 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
GLBE Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does GLBE convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
GLBE converts 177% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-6.5%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-16 | 3,598 | $33.30 | $119,813.4 |
| 2026-03-12 | 245 | $34.17 | $8,371.65 |
| 2026-02-25 | 1 | $34.30 | $34.3 |
| 2026-02-23 | 32,122 | $36.08 | $1.2M |
| 2026-02-20 | 64,000 | $36.24 | $2.3M |
| 2026-02-12 | 148 | $33.17 | $4,909.16 |
| 2026-02-09 | 14 | $32.61 | $456.54 |
| 2026-02-03 | 70 | $36.55 | $2,558.5 |
| 2026-02-02 | 8,842 | $36.55 | $323,175.1 |
| 2026-01-28 | 53 | $38.14 | $2,021.42 |
| 2026-01-26 | 159 | $37.55 | $5,970.45 |
| 2026-01-23 | 153 | $37.18 | $5,688.54 |
| 2026-01-20 | 10 | $37.50 | $375 |
| 2026-01-14 | 43 | $40.70 | $1,750.1 |
| 2025-12-29 | 39 | $39.60 | $1,544.4 |
| 2025-12-22 | 93 | $40.19 | $3,737.67 |
| 2025-12-11 | 1,503 | $38.95 | $58,541.85 |
| 2025-11-28 | 22,995 | $39.92 | $917,960.4 |
| 2025-11-13 | 2,385 | $36.59 | $87,267.15 |
| 2025-11-10 | 106 | $36.43 | $3,861.58 |
| 2025-11-06 | 317 | $36.37 | $11,529.29 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare GLBE to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.