GLO (GLO)

Market Cap
P/E Ratio
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 3/9

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

3/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics

Profitability & Value Creation

95.9%
Net Margin
-21.8%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-22.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)

Balance Sheet Health

0.49x
Debt / Equity

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
Price/Book
Avg Volume
52W High
52W Low
52W Range Position

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in GLO to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

GLO Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
GLOEpicenterSPDWETFGWXETFSMSNUnknownA000660UnknownASMLLow RiskHSBAUnknownROPMed Risk
GLO Price Drop (%)0

If GLO (GLO) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SAMSUNG ELECTR GDR REG S (SMSN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with GLO. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

GLO Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
GLO

ETFs with Highest GLO Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 2 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-07239,878$5.95$1.4M
2026-05-0612,647$5.87$74,237.89
2026-04-091$5.77$5.77
2026-03-024$6.04$24.16
2026-02-18168$6.07$1,019.76
2026-02-17325$6.01$1,953.25
2026-02-134,211$5.95$25,055.45
2026-02-0928$6.02$168.56
2026-01-30331$5.93$1,962.83
2026-01-29331$5.93$1,962.83
2026-01-2047,879$6.04$289,189.16
2025-11-1444$5.76$253.44
2025-11-125$5.83$29.15

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare GLO to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.