GSK.L (GSK.L)

$81.0B
Market Cap
14.6
P/E Ratio
0.35
Beta
3.55%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 8/9

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency is robust, evidenced by a 16.1% ROIC that significantly outperforms typical cost of equity benchmarks for mature pharmaceutical firms. This return profile is underpinned by exceptional profitability drivers rather than leverage or asset turnover; specifically, the DuPont decomposition reveals an operating environment where high gross margins at 72.4% and net margins at 17.5% are the primary engines of value creation. Financial stability further corroborates this quality assessment, with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 indicating strong balance sheet health and consistent earnings power relative to peers in unknown sectors.

Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing in modest growth expectations that may not fully align with the company's margin expansion capabilities. The current P/E multiple of 14.6x sits at a discount to historical norms for firms exhibiting such high net margins, yet it remains elevated when contrasted against the implied fair value derived from DCF modeling, which points to $12 per share. This discrepancy implies that while the stock trades below its own intrinsic valuation ceiling based on cash flow projections, the premium over broader sector averages reflects confidence in sustaining these double-digit profit rates despite only 4.1% revenue growth year-over-year.

The risk-reward profile presents a nuanced picture where fundamental strength contrasts with limited top-line momentum. While the high Piotroski score and superior ROIC mitigate downside risks associated with deteriorating fundamentals, the modest 4.1% revenue growth delta suggests potential constraints on future earnings acceleration absent new product launches or market share gains. Investors must weigh whether the current valuation adequately compensates for this stagnation in top-line expansion against the safety margin provided by the wide spread between actual returns and implied fair value.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$15$10$8
3%$17$12$9
4%$21$13$10

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $12 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

8/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals

Profitability & Value Creation

72.4%
Gross Margin
17.5%
Net Margin
16.1%
ROIC
+4.1%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+122.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
4.8B
Free Cash Flow
54%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

2.83x
Debt / Equity
0.82x
Current Ratio
11.8x
Interest Coverage
1.0x
Net Debt / EBITDA
10.4B
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.40
Act: $0.45
+12.2%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.42
Act: $0.47
+10.1%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.47
Act: $0.55
+16.8%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.23
Act: $0.26
+11.2%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

10.3
Forward P/E
0.50
PEG Ratio
4.97
Price/Book
9M
Avg Volume
$2282.00
52W High
$0.00
52W Low
52W Range Position

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in GSK.L to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

GSK.L Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
GSK.LEpicenterEWUETFHSBA.LHigh RiskAZN.LLow RiskSHEL.LMed RiskRR.LUnknownBATS.LMed Risk
GSK.L Price Drop (%)0

If GSK.L (GSK.L) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies HSBC Holdings PLC (HSBA.L) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with GSK.L. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

GSK.L Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
GSK.L

ETFs with Highest GSK.L Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

GSK.L Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does GSK.L convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$4.8B
EBITDA
$10.4B
FCF Conversion
46%
Reinvestment Rate
54%
46% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

GSK.L converts 46% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 54% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare GSK.L to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.