JP3436100006 (JP3436100006)

$20.56T
Market Cap
6.7
P/E Ratio
0.61
Beta
0.30%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 0.7 DistressROIC−WACC -1.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 0.7.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency presents a notable constraint, with the ROIC of 5.5% falling below the WACC of 6.9%, resulting in a negative spread that suggests value destruction rather than accretion despite strong profitability metrics. This divergence is particularly striking given the robust margin profile; a gross margin of 51.8% and net margin of 15.9% indicate superior pricing power or cost control, yet these operational strengths are not translating into returns exceeding the cost of capital. The DuPont decomposition implies that while margins drive earnings per share, they fail to compensate for potential inefficiencies in asset turnover or excessive leverage, as evidenced by an Altman Z-Score of 0.7 which flags elevated bankruptcy risk and a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 signaling moderate financial health without the stability of top-tier scores.

Valuation appears depressed relative to historical norms if one assumes the market is pricing in significant distress or stagnation, yet the multiple must be viewed through the lens of these fundamental weaknesses rather than traditional growth narratives. A P/E ratio of 6.7x typically suggests a deep discount for value stocks; however, when combined with negative ROIC-WACC spreads and low Altman scores, this compression may reflect rational market skepticism regarding future cash flow sustainability rather than an undervalued opportunity waiting to be exploited. The implied growth rate required to justify current multiples would need to align with the 7.2% revenue growth trajectory while simultaneously improving capital efficiency, a dual challenge that complicates standard DCF fair value assumptions which often rely on stable or expanding ROIC profiles.

The risk/reward profile is skewed heavily toward downside protection given the Altman Z-Score proximity to distress territory and the negative spread eroding shareholder equity over time. While insider activity or Fama-French alpha data are not provided in this dataset, the existing metrics suggest a stock where traditional value factors like low P/E may be misleading without addressing the underlying capital allocation failure. Investors must weigh whether the 15.9% net margin can sustain operations long enough for management to resolve the ROIC-WACC mismatch before the financial fragility indicated by an Altman score of 0.7 becomes a material threat to solvency.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
0.7
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

51.8%
Gross Margin
15.9%
Net Margin
5.5%
ROIC
6.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -1.4%— Negative spread.
+7.2%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+606.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-650.6B
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

2.23x
Debt / Equity
0.76x
Current Ratio
3.9x
Interest Coverage
2.7x
Net Debt / EBITDA
-2.23%
FCF Yield
3.2T
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $-28.93
Act: $88.52
+405.9%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $20.48
Act: $72.93
+256.1%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $41.19
Act: $437.45
+962.1%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $215.00
Act: $42.62
-80.2%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

12.2
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.33
Price/Book
50M
Avg Volume
$6923.75
52W High
$1432.50
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$1.4B
Tracked Passive Exposure
6
ETFs Holding JP3436100006
0.37%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$385B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like EFA or IEFA, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell JP3436100006 shares regardless of JP3436100006's individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.4B of passive capital is structurally linked to JP3436100006 through 6 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in JP3436100006 to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

JP3436100006 Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
JP3436100006EpicenterIEFAETFEFAETFSCHFETFNL0010273215Low RiskCH0012032048Low RiskNVDALow RiskCH0012005267Low RiskAAPLLow Risk
JP3436100006 Price Drop (%)0

If JP3436100006 (JP3436100006) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies ASML Holding N.V. (NL0010273215) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with JP3436100006. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

JP3436100006 Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
JP3436100006

Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

JP3436100006 Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does JP3436100006 convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$-650,593,000,000
EBITDA
$3153.1B
FCF Conversion
-21%
Reinvestment Rate
121%
-21% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
5.5%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-1.4%

JP3436100006 converts -21% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 121% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-1.4%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare JP3436100006 to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.