JP3633400001 (JP3633400001)

$44.16T
Market Cap
11.9
P/E Ratio
0.20
Beta
2.85%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 1.8 Gray ZoneBeneish M -2.41 CleanROIC−WACC +1.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 1.8.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency presents a modest spread, with Return on Invested Capital tracking at 8.0% against a Weighted Average Cost of Capital of 6.6%, yielding only a +1.4% excess return that suggests limited value creation relative to financing costs. This dynamic is underpinned by a DuPont-style margin profile where net margins sit at 9.9% and gross margins at 19.9%, indicating moderate pricing power but reliance on operational leverage rather than high-margin differentiation, while revenue growth of 6.5% reflects steady but unexceptional expansion. Creditworthiness metrics reveal a bifurcated risk picture; the Altman Z-Score of 1.8 signals elevated distress probability consistent with sub-investment grade status, yet this is offset by strong earnings quality indicators, including a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 and a significantly negative Beneish M-Score of -2.41, which collectively point to low manipulation risk despite the precarious solvency profile.

Valuation metrics place the equity at an attractive multiple of 11.9x earnings, though this assessment requires context regarding historical averages and sector peers which are currently unavailable in the dataset. Without comparative benchmarks or a specific Discounted Cash Flow model output defining fair value and implied growth rates, it remains unclear whether the market is pricing in conservative future cash flows or discounting for the underlying credit risks highlighted by the Altman score. The divergence between low valuation multiples and high distress probability suggests that current pricing may already reflect significant downside protection, yet the absence of sector context prevents a definitive conclusion on relative cheapness versus fundamental deterioration.

The risk-reward equilibrium hinges critically on whether the modest ROIC-WACC spread can sustainably expand given the 1.8 Altman Z-Score, which historically correlates with higher default probabilities in stressed economic environments. While the negative Beneish M-Score and moderate Piotroski score provide some confidence in reported earnings integrity, the fundamental economics do not yet demonstrate a robust moat or high-growth trajectory to justify capital deployment without further data on insider activity or Fama-French alpha adjustments that might clarify the stock's performance relative to size and value factors.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
1.8
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.41
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

19.9%
Gross Margin
9.9%
Net Margin
8.0%
ROIC
6.6%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +1.4%— Positive spread.
+6.5%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-3.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-1.6T
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

1.54x
Debt / Equity
1.26x
Current Ratio
77.3x
Interest Coverage
1.5x
Net Debt / EBITDA
-2.71%
FCF Yield
8.7T
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $41.15
Act: $51.61
+25.4%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $53.33
Act: $64.56
+21.1%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $50.08
Act: $71.51
+42.8%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $74.05
Act: $96.48
+30.3%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

10.4
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.13
Price/Book
24M
Avg Volume
$4000.00
52W High
$2226.50
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$3.0B
Tracked Passive Exposure
6
ETFs Holding JP3633400001
0.78%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$385B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like EFA or SCHF, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell JP3633400001 shares regardless of JP3633400001's individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.0B of passive capital is structurally linked to JP3633400001 through 6 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in JP3633400001 to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

JP3633400001 Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
JP3633400001EpicenterIEFAETFEFAETFSCHFETFNL0010273215Low RiskCH0012032048Low RiskNVDALow RiskCH0012005267Low RiskAAPLLow Risk
JP3633400001 Price Drop (%)0

If JP3633400001 (JP3633400001) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies ASML Holding N.V. (NL0010273215) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with JP3633400001. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

JP3633400001 Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
JP3633400001

Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

JP3633400001 Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does JP3633400001 convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$-1,560,993,000,000
EBITDA
$8749.9B
FCF Conversion
-18%
Reinvestment Rate
118%
-18% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
8.0%
ROIC − WACC Spread
1.4%

JP3633400001 converts -18% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 118% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 1.4% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare JP3633400001 to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.