JP3826900007 (JP3826900007)

$407.4B
Market Cap
22.4
P/E Ratio
0.88
Beta
2.18%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 1.9 Gray ZoneROIC−WACC -0.3%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 1.9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency presents a structural challenge, as the return on invested capital of 7.9% falls below the weighted average cost of capital of 8.2%, resulting in a negative spread that erodes intrinsic value over time despite robust revenue expansion of 11.9%. This valuation disconnect is partially offset by strong balance sheet health and earnings stability; a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 signals high financial strength, while the Altman Z-Score of 1.9 indicates a low probability of distress. However, the DuPont decomposition reveals that profitability is constrained by thin net margins at 2.8%, suggesting that current growth relies heavily on top-line velocity rather than margin expansion or operational leverage to drive returns.

Valuation metrics reflect significant optimism relative to fundamental performance, with a forward P/E ratio of 22.4x implying substantial future earnings acceleration necessary to justify the multiple given the negative ROIC-WACC spread. While the high growth rate supports premium pricing in isolation, the market appears to be pricing in a trajectory where operating leverage must eventually narrow the gap between capital costs and returns on invested assets. Without a material improvement in net margins or a shift toward higher-returning asset bases, the current multiple may compress as earnings fail to keep pace with investor expectations embedded in the price-to-earnings ratio.

The risk profile remains bifurcated: low default probability supported by the F-Score contrasts sharply with value-destructive capital deployment evidenced by the negative spread. If revenue growth decelerates or net margins contract further, the combination of high valuation and declining capital efficiency could trigger a sharp multiple contraction, whereas sustained margin improvement would be required to align the stock's price with its underlying economic reality.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
1.9
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

13.3%
Gross Margin
2.8%
Net Margin
7.9%
ROIC
8.3%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -0.3%— Negative spread.
+11.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+101.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-29.3B
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

2.04x
Debt / Equity
1.25x
Current Ratio
3.7x
Interest Coverage
1.7x
Net Debt / EBITDA
-5.10%
FCF Yield
96.8B
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $14.84
Act: $17.12
+15.4%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $27.58
Act: $7.25
-73.7%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $13.43
Act: $11.72
-12.8%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $53.65
Act: $96.96
+80.7%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

4.0
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.24
Price/Book
985241
Avg Volume
$3390.00
52W High
$1027.50
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$18M
Tracked Passive Exposure
2
ETFs Holding JP3826900007
0.01%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$222B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like IEFA or IXUS, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell JP3826900007 shares regardless of JP3826900007's individual fundamentals. We estimate $18M of passive capital is structurally linked to JP3826900007 through 2 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on JP3826900007's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in JP3826900007 to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

JP3826900007 Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
JP3826900007EpicenterIEFAETFIXUSETFNL0010273215Low RiskTW0002330008Low RiskCH0012032048Low RiskGB0005405286High Risk066922519Unknown
JP3826900007 Price Drop (%)0

If JP3826900007 (JP3826900007) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies ASML Holding N.V. (NL0010273215) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with JP3826900007. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

JP3826900007 Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
JP3826900007

Float lock-up computed from 2 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

JP3826900007 Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does JP3826900007 convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$-29,289,000,000
EBITDA
$96.8B
FCF Conversion
-30%
Reinvestment Rate
130%
-30% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
7.9%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-0.3%

JP3826900007 converts -30% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 130% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-0.3%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare JP3826900007 to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.