KD (KD)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 1.6.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency for KD is currently suboptimal, as the return on invested capital of 6.9% falls significantly short of the weighted average cost of capital at 10.1%, resulting in a negative spread of -3.2%. This indicates that recent operations are destroying value rather than generating excess returns. Despite this fundamental drag, earnings quality metrics present a mixed but largely positive picture; the company maintains a robust Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and an exceptionally low Beneish M-Score of -2.95, which strongly suggests minimal earnings manipulation risk. However, profitability is under pressure with net margins compressed to just 1.7% amid revenue contraction of -6.2%, while the Altman Z-Score of 1.6 flags elevated distress risks that warrant close monitoring alongside these operational headwinds.
Valuation metrics suggest a market price discount relative to intrinsic value models, though historical context remains unavailable for direct comparison. The current P/E ratio sits at 12.3x, while the discounted cash flow model implies a fair value of $17 per share based on projected growth assumptions inherent in that calculation. This divergence between the observed multiple and the DCF-derived target price suggests the market may be pricing in persistent operational deterioration or liquidity concerns not fully captured by static margin analysis. Without sector-specific benchmarks to contextualize whether 12.3x is historically cheap for this specific business model, the valuation gap must be viewed strictly as a function of current cash flow expectations versus long-term terminal value assumptions embedded in the DCF framework.
The risk-reward profile appears bifurcated between solvency concerns and earnings integrity. The Altman Z-Score below 1.8 signals potential financial distress, creating downside volatility that could widen credit spreads or trigger covenant breaches if leverage increases further. Conversely, the high Beneish M-Score provides a significant safety margin against accounting fraud, supporting the reliability of reported fundamentals despite the negative revenue trend and capital inefficiency. Investors must weigh whether the current valuation compresses adequately to offset the probability of financial distress before any potential recovery in operating margins can restore value creation capabilities.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8.1% | 10.1% | 12.1% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $22 | $15 | $11 |
| 3% | $26 | $17 | $12 |
| 4% | $32 | $20 | $14 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.1%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $17 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XSW or VFVA, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell KD shares regardless of KD's individual fundamentals. We estimate $124M of passive capital is structurally linked to KD through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on KD's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in KD to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If KD (KD) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Adobe Inc. (ADBE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with KD. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 11 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
KD Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest KD Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
KD Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does KD convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
KD converts 22% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 78% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-3.2%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | 260 | $12.64 | $3,286.4 |
| 2026-05-04 | 165 | $14.36 | $2,369.4 |
| 2026-05-01 | 412 | $13.82 | $5,693.84 |
| 2026-04-30 | 3,111 | $13.98 | $43,491.78 |
| 2026-04-28 | 367 | $13.59 | $4,987.53 |
| 2026-04-07 | 20 | $12.91 | $258.2 |
| 2026-04-06 | 20 | $13.23 | $264.6 |
| 2026-03-30 | 756 | $12.36 | $9,344.16 |
| 2026-03-27 | 1,813 | $12.82 | $23,242.66 |
| 2026-03-23 | 287,689 | $12.21 | $3.5M |
| 2026-03-20 | 1,860 | $12.37 | $23,008.2 |
| 2026-03-17 | 172,467 | $12.31 | $2.1M |
| 2026-03-11 | 491 | $12.70 | $6,235.7 |
| 2026-03-04 | 5 | $12.85 | $64.25 |
| 2026-03-03 | 1,496 | $12.83 | $19,193.68 |
| 2026-03-02 | 24 | $12.33 | $295.92 |
| 2026-02-23 | 32,000 | $12.51 | $400,320 |
| 2026-02-19 | 1 | $13.12 | $13.12 |
| 2026-02-13 | 19 | $11.34 | $215.46 |
| 2026-02-05 | 21,952 | $23.38 | $513,237.76 |
| 2026-02-04 | 28,939 | $22.21 | $642,735.19 |
| 2026-01-28 | 12 | $23.83 | $285.96 |
| 2026-01-13 | 5 | $27.34 | $136.7 |
| 2025-12-26 | 323 | $27.28 | $8,811.44 |
| 2025-12-24 | 25,735 | $27.13 | $698,190.55 |
| 2025-12-22 | 485 | $27.08 | $13,133.8 |
| 2025-12-19 | 3,393 | $26.95 | $91,441.35 |
| 2025-12-16 | 60,864 | $26.55 | $1.6M |
| 2025-12-04 | 91 | $26.30 | $2,393.3 |
| 2025-12-03 | 91 | $25.64 | $2,333.24 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare KD to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.