LAC (LAC)

Market Cap
P/E Ratio
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 1/9

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 1/9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

1/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics

Profitability & Value Creation

-1.7%
ROIC
-187.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-826.3M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.63x
Debt / Equity
5.16x
Current Ratio
-51.8M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.04
Act: $-0.02
+49.3%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.05
Act: $-0.06
-20.0%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.05
Act: $-0.03
+33.9%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.06
Act: $-0.25
-358.5%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
Price/Book
Avg Volume
52W High
52W Low
52W Range Position

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in LAC to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

LAC Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
LACEpicenterSPDWETFGWXETFSMSNUnknownA000660UnknownASMLLow RiskHSBAUnknownROPMed Risk
LAC Price Drop (%)0

If LAC (LAC) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SAMSUNG ELECTR GDR REG S (SMSN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with LAC. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

LAC Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
LAC

ETFs with Highest LAC Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 2 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1439,639$5.48$217,221.72
2026-05-1337,489$5.57$208,813.73
2026-05-12917$5.79$5,309.43
2026-05-11163,322$5.57$909,703.54
2026-05-0441,394$5.71$236,359.74
2026-05-0154,554$5.73$312,594.42
2026-04-273,300$4.64$15,312
2026-04-242,522$4.72$11,903.84
2026-04-2335,089$4.98$174,743.22
2026-04-2229,252$4.74$138,654.48
2026-04-2134,468$4.98$171,650.64
2026-04-20206,241$4.84$998,206.44
2026-04-17600$4.87$2,922
2026-04-154,070$4.41$17,948.7
2026-04-14257,288$4.38$1.1M
2026-04-072,512$4.03$10,123.36
2026-04-066,673$4.04$26,958.92
2026-04-0129,846$3.95$117,891.7
2026-03-2518,563$4.01$74,437.63
2026-03-2429,901$3.94$117,809.94
2026-03-2315,585$3.71$57,820.35
2026-03-203,340$4.01$13,393.4
2026-03-1817,683$4.50$79,573.5
2026-03-1714,634$4.39$64,243.26
2026-03-1620,489$4.39$89,946.71
2026-03-122,074$4.69$9,727.06
2026-03-1189,881$4.69$421,541.89
2026-03-092,486$4.55$11,311.3
2026-03-054,405$4.81$21,188.05
2026-03-039,840$5.12$50,380.8

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare LAC to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.