LAES (LAES)

Market Cap
P/E Ratio
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Beneish M 12.02 Flag (> −2.22)

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9. Beneish M-Score of 12.02 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
12.02
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

47.3%
Gross Margin
-187.3%
Net Margin
-5.6%
ROIC
+66.2%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-61.3%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-32.5M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.09x
Debt / Equity
15.92x
Current Ratio
-152.4x
Interest Coverage
-33.8M
EBITDA

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
Price/Book
Avg Volume
52W High
52W Low
52W Range Position

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in LAES to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

LAES Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
LAESEpicenterGWXETF6787UnknownAIXAUnknownMGORUnknownA000990UnknownTVEUnknown
LAES Price Drop (%)0

If LAES (LAES) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies MEIKO ELECTRONICS CO LTD (6787) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with LAES. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

LAES Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
LAES

ETFs with Highest LAES Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 1 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1433,510$2.96$99,189.6
2026-05-1375,793$2.94$222,831.42
2026-05-121,050,135$3.06$3.2M
2026-05-111,243,212$2.92$3.6M
2026-05-0835,620$3.05$108,641
2026-05-07466,699$3.32$1.5M
2026-05-0696,326$2.91$280,308.66
2026-05-0586,758$2.97$257,671.26
2026-05-04214,843$2.87$616,599.41
2026-05-01214,732$2.90$622,722.8
2026-04-30160,450$2.64$423,588
2026-04-29226,766$2.77$628,141.82
2026-04-28434,811$2.85$1.2M
2026-04-27687,436$2.95$2.0M
2026-04-24840,694$2.81$2.4M
2026-04-23883,962$3.06$2.7M
2026-04-22611,280$2.96$1.8M
2026-04-212,062,814$2.94$6.1M
2026-04-202,002,243$2.70$5.4M
2026-04-17500,688$2.75$1.4M
2026-04-16370,495$2.80$1.0M
2026-04-15308,435$2.59$798,846.65
2026-04-131,306$2.10$2,742.6
2026-04-105,424$2.09$11,336.16
2026-04-099,279$2.14$19,857.06
2026-04-089,040$2.12$19,164.8
2026-04-073,347$2.38$7,965.86
2026-04-061,021$2.50$2,552.5
2026-04-014,188$2.62$10,972.56
2026-03-31500$2.31$1,155

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare LAES to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.