MOG-A (MOG-A)

$9.1B
Market Cap
35.7
P/E Ratio
0.94
Beta
0.42%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 4.6 SafeBeneish M -2.43 CleanROIC−WACC -0.8%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 4.6 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency for MOG-A presents a notable constraint, as the return on invested capital of 9.2% falls below the weighted average cost of capital of 10.0%, resulting in a negative spread that suggests value destruction at the margin despite robust profitability metrics. This dynamic is juxtaposed against strong earnings quality indicators; a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 signals solid financial health, while an Altman Z-Score of 4.6 places the entity well within safe territory regarding bankruptcy risk. Furthermore, the Beneish M-Score of -2.43 indicates low probability of earnings manipulation, supported by healthy gross margins at 27.4% and a net margin expansion to 6.1%, all while revenue grows at a steady 7.0% year-over-year.

Valuation metrics suggest significant market premium relative to intrinsic value calculations, with the current price-to-earnings ratio of 35.7x implying aggressive growth expectations that may not be fully supported by underlying fundamentals. While the DCF model assigns a fair value of $63, the existing multiple indicates the stock is trading at a substantial discount to this calculated benchmark, potentially reflecting market skepticism about sustaining future returns or concerns over the negative ROIC-WACC spread persisting into the long term. The disparity between the high valuation multiple and the modest capital efficiency creates a tension where investors are pricing in superior growth trajectories that current operational metrics have yet to validate.

The risk-reward profile appears bifurcated, with strong defensive characteristics evidenced by low manipulation scores and moderate distress risks contrasting sharply with inefficient capital generation. If management can address the negative spread between returns on invested capital and the cost of financing, the valuation gap could narrow significantly; however, without an immediate improvement in capital efficiency, the high multiple carries elevated downside risk if growth slows or margins compress further.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$81$55$39
3%$98$63$44
4%$123$74$50

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $63 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
4.6
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.43
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

27.4%
Gross Margin
6.1%
Net Margin
9.2%
ROIC
10.0%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -0.8%— Negative spread.
+7.0%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+12.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
128.4M
Free Cash Flow
28%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

1.22x
Debt / Equity
2.12x
Current Ratio
5.3x
Interest Coverage
1.8x
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.29%
FCF Yield
488.5M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.77
Act: $1.92
+8.2%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $2.15
Act: $2.37
+10.0%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $2.22
Act: $2.56
+15.4%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $2.21
Act: $2.63
+18.9%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

24.9
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
4.40
Price/Book
297010
Avg Volume
$354.20
52W High
$143.67
52W Low
52W Range Position

MOG-A Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does MOG-A convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$128M
EBITDA
$488M
FCF Conversion
26%
Reinvestment Rate
74%
26% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
9.2%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-0.8%

MOG-A converts 26% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 74% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-0.8%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare MOG-A to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.