MQG.AX (MQG.AX)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicBelow-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9; Altman Z of 0.7 falls in the academic distress zone.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of MQG.AX present a stark dichotomy between exceptional profitability metrics and deteriorating capital efficiency. While the DuPont decomposition reveals an extraordinary margin profile driven by a 100% gross margin and a net margin expanding to 54.7%, this top-line quality is undermined by a negative ROIC-WACC spread of -1.8%. This indicates that despite generating substantial accounting profits, the company's returns on invested capital fail to cover its cost of equity, suggesting value destruction at the enterprise level. Compounding these concerns are distress signals from credit and financial health models: an Altman Z-Score of 0.7 places the firm in the "distress zone," while a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 reflects significant weakness in fundamental quality trends over time, even as revenue grows at an 8.7% annualized rate.
Valuation multiples appear stretched relative to the company's underlying capital destruction dynamics. A current P/E ratio of 20.5x implies a premium for earnings that contradicts the negative spread between ROIC and WACC, suggesting the market may be pricing in growth assumptions not yet reflected in cash flow generation or asset efficiency. The disconnect between high margins and low returns on investment creates uncertainty regarding whether future multiples can sustain current levels without significant operational leverage improvements or capital restructuring to align returns with the cost of equity.
The risk landscape is further complicated by conflicting signals from fraud detection and insider sentiment metrics. A Beneish M-Score of -2.39 suggests a lower probability of earnings manipulation compared to many peers, yet this credibility must be weighed heavily against the precarious Altman Z-Score which flags potential insolvency risks. Without additional data on Fama-French alpha or specific insider transaction volumes, the primary investment thesis hinges entirely on whether management can reverse the negative ROIC-WACC spread before distress indicators escalate further.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in MQG.AX to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If MQG.AX (MQG.AX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA.AX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with MQG.AX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
MQG.AX Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest MQG.AX Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
Compare MQG.AX to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.