NESN.SW (NESN.SW)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 2.9.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of NESN.SW demonstrates a robust ROIC-WACC spread of 4.2%, indicating that the firm generates returns significantly above its cost of equity, though this advantage is partially offset by declining top-line momentum with revenue contracting at -2.0% year-over-year. The DuPont decomposition reveals an ROE of 27.3% driven primarily by high leverage (Equity Multiplier of 3.85x) rather than operational efficiency or pricing power, as evidenced by the modest asset turnover of 0.71x despite healthy gross margins at 45.8%. While net margins remain solid at 10.1%, the financial structure suggests earnings are heavily reliant on debt financing; this is corroborated by an Altman Z-Score of 2.9, which signals a moderate risk zone approaching distress territory, while a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 reflects generally sound fundamentals but lacks recent strength in profitability or leverage reduction metrics.
Valuation multiples currently sit at 21.7x P/E, requiring scrutiny against historical norms and sector peers to determine if the market is pricing in a reversion to mean or sustained growth given the negative revenue trajectory. The DCF model implies a fair value of $198, suggesting that current market prices may be either aligned with intrinsic worth based on specific cash flow assumptions or potentially elevated if those assumptions do not account for the headwinds evident in recent sales performance. Investors must weigh whether the premium valuation is justified by the high ROE generated through leverage or if the contraction in revenue growth warrants a re-rating of expectations downward, as the disconnect between shrinking revenues and double-digit margins could compress future multiples unless margin expansion accelerates to compensate.
The synthesis of these factors presents a nuanced risk-reward profile where strong return generation coexists with operational stagnation and elevated financial leverage. The moderate Altman score serves as a critical warning sign regarding liquidity buffers, while the reliance on asset turnover below unity indicates limited scale efficiency in deploying its capital base. Without evidence of margin improvement or revenue stabilization to offset these structural headwinds, the current valuation may be fragile, leaving little room for error if earnings quality deteriorates further under pressure from shrinking sales volumes and high debt obligations.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.3% | 9.3% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $222 | $162 | $110 |
| 3% | $293 | $198 | $127 |
| 4% | $436 | $256 | $150 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.3%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $198 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like DWM or DFAI, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NESN.SW shares regardless of NESN.SW's individual fundamentals. We estimate $139M of passive capital is structurally linked to NESN.SW through 2 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on NESN.SW's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in NESN.SW to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If NESN.SW (NESN.SW) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies HSBC Holdings PLC (HSBA.L) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with NESN.SW. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
NESN.SW Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest NESN.SW Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
NESN.SW Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does NESN.SW convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
NESN.SW converts 68% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 4.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Compare NESN.SW to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.