NESN.SW (NESN.SW)

$195.9B
Market Cap
21.7
P/E Ratio
0.51
Beta
4.04%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 2.9 Gray ZoneROIC−WACC +4.2%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 2.9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency of NESN.SW demonstrates a robust ROIC-WACC spread of 4.2%, indicating that the firm generates returns significantly above its cost of equity, though this advantage is partially offset by declining top-line momentum with revenue contracting at -2.0% year-over-year. The DuPont decomposition reveals an ROE of 27.3% driven primarily by high leverage (Equity Multiplier of 3.85x) rather than operational efficiency or pricing power, as evidenced by the modest asset turnover of 0.71x despite healthy gross margins at 45.8%. While net margins remain solid at 10.1%, the financial structure suggests earnings are heavily reliant on debt financing; this is corroborated by an Altman Z-Score of 2.9, which signals a moderate risk zone approaching distress territory, while a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 reflects generally sound fundamentals but lacks recent strength in profitability or leverage reduction metrics.

Valuation multiples currently sit at 21.7x P/E, requiring scrutiny against historical norms and sector peers to determine if the market is pricing in a reversion to mean or sustained growth given the negative revenue trajectory. The DCF model implies a fair value of $198, suggesting that current market prices may be either aligned with intrinsic worth based on specific cash flow assumptions or potentially elevated if those assumptions do not account for the headwinds evident in recent sales performance. Investors must weigh whether the premium valuation is justified by the high ROE generated through leverage or if the contraction in revenue growth warrants a re-rating of expectations downward, as the disconnect between shrinking revenues and double-digit margins could compress future multiples unless margin expansion accelerates to compensate.

The synthesis of these factors presents a nuanced risk-reward profile where strong return generation coexists with operational stagnation and elevated financial leverage. The moderate Altman score serves as a critical warning sign regarding liquidity buffers, while the reliance on asset turnover below unity indicates limited scale efficiency in deploying its capital base. Without evidence of margin improvement or revenue stabilization to offset these structural headwinds, the current valuation may be fragile, leaving little room for error if earnings quality deteriorates further under pressure from shrinking sales volumes and high debt obligations.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%7.3%9.3%
2%$222$162$110
3%$293$198$127
4%$436$256$150

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.3%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $198 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
2.9
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

45.8%
Gross Margin
10.1%
Net Margin
11.5%
ROIC
7.3%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +4.2%— Positive spread.
-2.0%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-17.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
11.0B
Free Cash Flow
71%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

10.1%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.71x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
3.85x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
27.3%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

2.85x
Debt / Equity
0.79x
Current Ratio
6.9x
Interest Coverage
2.6x
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.62%
FCF Yield
16.2B
EBITDA

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

16.4
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
5.97
Price/Book
4M
Avg Volume
$91.38
52W High
$69.90
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$139M
Tracked Passive Exposure
2
ETFs Holding NESN.SW
0.92%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$15B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like DWM or DFAI, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NESN.SW shares regardless of NESN.SW's individual fundamentals. We estimate $139M of passive capital is structurally linked to NESN.SW through 2 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on NESN.SW's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in NESN.SW to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

NESN.SW Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
NESN.SWEpicenterDFAIETFDWMETFHSBA.LHigh RiskSHEL.LMed RiskROP.SWLow Risk7203.TMed RiskASMLLow Risk
NESN.SW Price Drop (%)0

If NESN.SW (NESN.SW) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies HSBC Holdings PLC (HSBA.L) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with NESN.SW. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

NESN.SW Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
NESN.SW

ETFs with Highest NESN.SW Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

NESN.SW Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does NESN.SW convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$11.0B
EBITDA
$16.2B
FCF Conversion
68%
Reinvestment Rate
32%
68% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
11.5%
ROIC − WACC Spread
4.2%

NESN.SW converts 68% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 4.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare NESN.SW to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.