NPK (NPK)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 8.4. Beneish M-Score of -1.73 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency presents a modest spread, with ROIC at 8.4% barely exceeding the WACC of 8.1%, resulting in a narrow +0.3% margin that suggests limited value creation relative to cost of capital. Despite this tight economic moat, profitability drivers remain robust as net margins sit at 6.6% and gross margins expand to 16.0%. However, earnings quality indicators reveal mixed signals; the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates a lack of financial strength improvements compared to peers, while the Altman Z-Score of 8.4 points to low bankruptcy risk. Conversely, the Beneish M-Score of -1.73 strongly suggests that earnings are unlikely to be manipulated, offering some reassurance regarding reported performance despite the mediocre Piotroski rating.
Valuation metrics reflect aggressive market pricing relative to historical norms and sector benchmarks, with a current P/E ratio of 28.3x implying significant growth expectations embedded in shares. This premium appears justified only if revenue expansion sustains its impressive YoY trajectory of 29.7%, as the narrow ROIC-WACC spread leaves little room for error before returns deteriorate below capital costs. The disconnect between high top-line momentum and stagnant capital efficiency metrics creates a scenario where multiple compression could occur rapidly should growth rates decelerate even slightly, potentially eroding shareholder value given the current valuation floor.
The risk profile is characterized by a divergence between solvency stability and operational leverage; while balance sheet health appears secure per Altman standards, the inability to generate returns materially above the cost of capital limits downside protection during market stress. Investors must weigh whether the 29.7% revenue growth can translate into improved ROIC before earnings quality concerns or margin compression impact stock performance. The data suggests a high-beta opportunity where upside relies entirely on sustaining hyper-growth, while any slowdown exposes the thin valuation cushion inherent in the current multiple structure.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XAR or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NPK shares regardless of NPK's individual fundamentals. We estimate $33M of passive capital is structurally linked to NPK through 7 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on NPK's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in NPK to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If NPK (NPK) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies ROCKET LAB CORP (RKLB) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with NPK. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
NPK Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest NPK Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
NPK Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does NPK convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
NPK converts -75% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 175% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 0.3% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-29 | 68 | $146.54 | $9,964.72 |
| 2026-04-10 | 60 | $142.97 | $8,578.2 |
| 2026-04-06 | 1,531 | $141.65 | $216,866.15 |
| 2026-04-02 | 1,531 | $141.89 | $217,233.59 |
| 2026-04-01 | 1,531 | $137.06 | $209,838.86 |
| 2026-03-18 | 957 | $134.76 | $128,965.32 |
| 2026-03-17 | 448 | $139.38 | $62,442.24 |
| 2026-02-24 | 55 | $127.36 | $7,004.8 |
| 2026-02-20 | 1 | $127.05 | $127.05 |
| 2026-02-03 | 17 | $131.95 | $2,243.15 |
| 2025-12-26 | 160 | $109.76 | $17,561.6 |
| 2025-12-16 | 24 | $104.93 | $2,518.32 |
| 2025-12-10 | 68 | $101.00 | $6,868 |
| 2025-11-06 | 128 | $107.86 | $13,806.08 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare NPK to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.