ONC (ONC)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 5.2 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency presents a significant headwind, as the return on invested capital of 5.9% falls short of the weighted average cost of capital at 8.0%, generating a negative spread that erodes shareholder value despite robust profitability metrics. This operational dynamic contrasts sharply with strong earnings quality indicators; the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and Beneish M-Score of -2.84 suggest high financial integrity, while an Altman Z-Score of 5.2 indicates a low probability of insolvency. The DuPont decomposition reveals that returns are driven primarily by exceptional gross margins at 87.5% rather than leverage or asset turnover, yet these expansive margins fail to compensate for the underlying capital inefficiency when weighed against the cost of funds.
Valuation metrics reflect extreme market optimism regarding future growth potential, with a current price-to-earnings ratio of 115.3x significantly outstripping historical norms and sector averages implied by such high multiples. This premium pricing assumes sustained execution that aligns with revenue growth accelerating to 40.2% year-over-year; however, the discounted cash flow model assigns a fair value of $15, suggesting the current market price may be detached from intrinsic worth based on present fundamentals. The divergence between the explosive top-line expansion and the negative ROIC-WACC spread implies that investors are pricing in a future normalization where operating returns will eventually exceed capital costs, or conversely, they anticipate massive scale efficiencies not yet visible in historical spreads.
The risk-reward profile is bifurcated: while the low bankruptcy risk and strong earnings quality provide a safety floor, the negative economic moat created by underperforming ROIC against WACC introduces structural downside if growth decelerates even marginally. Any failure to convert this revenue surge into higher capital returns would likely trigger a severe multiple compression, as the market cannot sustain valuations for assets that systematically destroy value in their current form.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 8% | 10% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $19 | $13 | $10 |
| 3% | $23 | $15 | $11 |
| 4% | $33 | $18 | $12 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=8.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $15 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ONC Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does ONC convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
ONC converts 140% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 665 | $316.55 | $210,505.75 |
| 2026-05-05 | 304 | $297.14 | $90,330.56 |
| 2026-05-04 | 304 | $293.86 | $89,333.44 |
| 2026-04-20 | 99 | $323.87 | $32,063.13 |
| 2026-04-16 | 10,000 | $319.94 | $3.2M |
| 2026-03-24 | 298 | $274.73 | $81,869.54 |
| 2026-03-20 | 1 | $282.72 | $282.72 |
| 2026-03-13 | 2,864 | $285.30 | $817,099.2 |
| 2026-03-12 | 148 | $298.91 | $44,238.68 |
| 2026-03-11 | 3,585 | $305.39 | $1.1M |
| 2026-03-05 | 3 | $299.02 | $897.06 |
| 2026-02-27 | 796 | $322.37 | $256,606.52 |
| 2026-02-26 | 1,576 | $352.23 | $555,114.48 |
| 2026-02-25 | 357 | $369.00 | $131,733 |
| 2026-02-23 | 296 | $362.14 | $107,193.44 |
| 2026-02-19 | 54 | $359.05 | $19,388.7 |
| 2026-02-18 | 363 | $354.86 | $128,814.18 |
| 2026-02-09 | 14,246 | $353.92 | $5.0M |
| 2026-02-06 | 299 | $347.00 | $103,753 |
| 2026-02-04 | 6 | $346.38 | $2,078.28 |
| 2026-02-03 | 15,045 | $345.00 | $5.2M |
| 2026-01-30 | 21 | $350.00 | $7,350 |
| 2026-01-27 | 32 | $337.79 | $10,809.28 |
| 2026-01-26 | 68 | $339.32 | $23,073.76 |
| 2026-01-22 | 16 | $341.64 | $5,466.24 |
| 2026-01-15 | 18 | $346.75 | $6,241.5 |
| 2026-01-14 | 2,597 | $351.06 | $911,702.82 |
| 2026-01-08 | 67 | $333.87 | $22,369.29 |
| 2026-01-07 | 5 | $320.35 | $1,601.75 |
| 2026-01-06 | 94 | $320.30 | $30,108.2 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ONC to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.