OWL (OWL)

Market Cap
P/E Ratio
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Beneish M -2.78 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of OWL present a distinct divergence between top-line momentum and bottom-line efficiency. While revenue growth accelerates at 25% year-over-year, suggesting strong market demand or pricing power evidenced by a robust 54.5% gross margin, the company's ability to convert these sales into equity value is severely constrained. The DuPont decomposition reveals that a meager net margin of 2.8%, compounded by low asset turnover of 0.23x and moderate leverage of 2.06x, drives an ROE of merely 1.3%. This structural inefficiency results in a negative spread between the return on invested capital (ROIC) of 3.5% and the cost of equity, indicating that current operations are destroying value relative to capital requirements. Despite these operational headwinds, financial stability metrics remain resilient; a Beneish M-Score of -2.78 signals low earnings manipulation risk, while a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 reflects moderate fundamental strength without recent deterioration or significant improvement.

Valuation analysis suggests the market may be pricing in an optimistic trajectory that ignores current capital efficiency constraints. With a DCF-derived fair value estimated at $54, investors must assess whether this target implicitly assumes margin expansion or asset lightening to justify the premium over intrinsic cash flow generation. The disconnect between high revenue growth and sub-3% ROIC implies significant upside potential if operational leverage improves, yet it also carries substantial downside risk should margins compress further given the already thin net profit line.

Insider activity remains neutral with zero net flow over the past 90 days, offering no clear signal of management's immediate conviction regarding future capital allocation or strategic shifts. The combination of high growth velocity and low profitability creates a high-variance profile where the stock could re-rate sharply if DuPont components like asset turnover improve, or decline precipitously if margin compression occurs without corresponding efficiency gains.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$67$48$37
3%$79$54$40
4%$97$62$45

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $54 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
-2.78
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

54.5%
Gross Margin
2.8%
Net Margin
3.5%
ROIC
+25.0%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-28.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.2B
Free Cash Flow
46%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

2.8%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.23x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
2.06x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
1.3%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

1.06x
Debt / Equity
0.95x
Current Ratio
3.1x
Interest Coverage
2.5x
Net Debt / EBITDA
894.1M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.18
Act: $0.17
-7.3%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.21
Act: $0.21
+1.9%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.22
Act: $0.22
-0.6%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.22
Act: $0.24
+6.8%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
Price/Book
Avg Volume
52W High
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$303M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding OWL
0.04%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$834B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like VBK or VOT, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell OWL shares regardless of OWL's individual fundamentals. We estimate $303M of passive capital is structurally linked to OWL through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on OWL's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in OWL to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

OWL Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
OWLEpicenterVUGETFVOETFVYMETFJPMHigh RiskBRK.BUnknownMALow RiskSTXLow RiskBACHigh Risk
OWL Price Drop (%)0

If OWL (OWL) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with OWL. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

OWL Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
OWL

Float lock-up computed from 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

OWL Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does OWL convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$1.2B
EBITDA
$894M
FCF Conversion
134%
Reinvestment Rate
-34%
134% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

OWL converts 134% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-143,633$9.77$35,494.41
2026-05-13820,173$10.00$8.2M
2026-05-1277,876$10.08$784,990.08
2026-05-1127,857$10.56$294,169.92
2026-05-0724,602$10.54$259,305.08
2026-05-068,519$10.75$91,579.25
2026-05-0539,247$10.12$397,179.64
2026-04-3037,934$8.88$336,853.92
2026-04-2937,901$8.86$335,802.86
2026-04-2853,844$8.92$480,288.48
2026-04-271$9.18$9.18
2026-04-241$9.42$9.42
2026-04-239,738$9.92$96,600.96
2026-04-2235,800$9.87$353,346
2026-04-2165,540$9.89$648,190.6
2026-04-20500$9.85$4,925
2026-04-1629,255$9.92$290,209.6
2026-04-1525,342$9.17$232,386.14
2026-04-131,894$8.23$15,587.62
2026-04-10420,128$8.28$3.5M
2026-04-09123,191$8.32$1.0M
2026-04-071,000$8.45$8,450
2026-04-064,084$8.57$34,999.88
2026-04-0299,706$8.71$868,439.26
2026-04-0135,472$9.13$323,859.36
2026-03-3168,925$9.07$625,149.75
2026-03-27169,046$9.02$1.5M
2026-03-266,191$9.03$55,904.73
2026-03-25318,927$8.96$2.9M
2026-03-246,340$9.09$57,630.6

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare OWL to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.