PBR (PBR)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 1.4.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency demonstrates robust value creation, evidenced by a return on invested capital of 13.1% significantly outpacing the weighted average cost of capital at 7.4%, yielding a positive spread of +5.7%. This economic moat is underpinned by exceptionally high profitability metrics, with net margins expanding to 22.0% and gross margins holding steady at 47.6%, suggesting strong pricing power or operational leverage despite the current revenue contraction of -2.4%. The balance sheet stability appears reinforced by a Beneish M-Score of -2.59, indicating low likelihood of earnings manipulation, though the Altman Z-Score of 1.4 warrants monitoring for potential distress signals given its proximity to insolvency thresholds. These fundamentals are further validated by a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, reflecting strong financial health across nine criteria despite recent top-line headwinds.
Valuation metrics present a stark divergence between market pricing and intrinsic value models. The stock trades at a compressed multiple of 6.8x earnings, which is materially below typical sector norms for companies exhibiting such high-margin profiles. A discounted cash flow analysis anchors the fair value estimate at $19, implying that current market prices may not fully reflect the underlying cash generation capabilities or future growth assumptions inherent in the DCF model's inputs. This discrepancy suggests the market is pricing in a scenario of persistent revenue decline rather than anticipating stabilization or recovery, potentially creating a significant margin of safety if operational trends reverse.
Risk assessment reveals a complex risk-reward profile characterized by divergent fundamental indicators and specific valuation sensitivities. While the Piotroski score signals financial resilience, the Altman Z-Score introduces solvency concerns that could exacerbate volatility during market stress periods. The combination of shrinking revenues with an extremely low P/E ratio creates a binary outcome where any stabilization in top-line growth would likely trigger rapid multiple expansion toward DCF fair value levels. Conversely, further deterioration in revenue or leverage ratios could quickly erode the current valuation cushion, making the stock's trajectory highly dependent on near-term operational execution rather than long-term structural advantages alone.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.4% | 9.4% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $22 | $16 | $12 |
| 3% | $29 | $19 | $13 |
| 4% | $42 | $24 | $15 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.4%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $19 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in PBR to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If PBR (PBR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD (700) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with PBR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
PBR Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest PBR Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 1 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
PBR Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does PBR convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
PBR converts 36% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 64% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 5.7% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 430 | $19.59 | $8,423.7 |
| 2026-05-12 | 100 | $20.75 | $2,075 |
| 2026-05-11 | 13,539 | $20.33 | $275,247.87 |
| 2026-05-08 | 38,590 | $20.37 | $786,078.3 |
| 2026-05-07 | 38,590 | $20.91 | $806,916.9 |
| 2026-05-01 | 361,904 | $22.03 | $8.0M |
| 2026-04-27 | 334,360 | $20.87 | $7.0M |
| 2026-04-24 | 327,313 | $21.27 | $7.0M |
| 2026-04-22 | 37,840 | $21.15 | $800,316 |
| 2026-04-21 | 3,071 | $20.76 | $63,753.96 |
| 2026-04-20 | 176,689 | $20.45 | $3.6M |
| 2026-04-17 | 72,008 | $21.50 | $1.5M |
| 2026-04-16 | 43,087 | $20.54 | $885,006.98 |
| 2026-04-15 | 500,000 | $21.01 | $10.5M |
| 2026-04-13 | 2,000 | $21.51 | $43,020 |
| 2026-04-10 | 8,419 | $20.69 | $174,189.11 |
| 2026-04-09 | 123,638 | $19.98 | $2.5M |
| 2026-04-07 | 640 | $20.86 | $13,350.4 |
| 2026-04-06 | 1,451 | $20.56 | $29,832.56 |
| 2026-04-02 | 43,190 | $20.08 | $867,255.2 |
| 2026-04-01 | 2,014,221 | $20.75 | $41.8M |
| 2026-03-31 | 7,755 | $20.81 | $161,381.55 |
| 2026-03-27 | 88,549 | $20.33 | $1.8M |
| 2026-03-26 | 17,984 | $19.82 | $356,442.88 |
| 2026-03-23 | 376,870 | $18.80 | $7.1M |
| 2026-03-20 | 27,182 | $19.78 | $537,659.96 |
| 2026-03-18 | 2,000 | $19.51 | $39,020 |
| 2026-03-17 | 14,943 | $19.17 | $286,457.31 |
| 2026-03-12 | 191 | $18.99 | $3,627.09 |
| 2026-03-11 | 23,028 | $17.99 | $414,273.72 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare PBR to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.