RDVT (RDVT)

$707M
Market Cap
51.6
P/E Ratio
1.71
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Beneish M -2.86 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The company exhibits robust fundamental quality, characterized by a high gross margin of 83.7% and an impressive net margin expansion to 14.6%, indicating strong pricing power or cost discipline relative to peers. This profitability is underpinned by significant revenue growth of 20.0% year-over-year, suggesting the business model scales effectively without immediate signs of stagnation. Financial integrity appears solid based on a high Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9 and a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.86, which collectively signal low earnings manipulation risk and strong financial health despite the ROIC-WACC spread not being explicitly quantified in the provided dataset; however, the combination of double-digit margins and growth typically implies an efficient capital deployment strategy that drives return on equity through margin expansion rather than leverage or asset turnover alone.

Valuation metrics present a notable divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value estimates. The stock trades at a premium multiple of 51.6x earnings, which is substantially elevated relative to historical norms for firms with similar growth profiles unless the sector average implies even higher multiples due to scarcity. While specific historical comparisons are absent from the data, such a high forward P/E suggests the market is pricing in sustained acceleration beyond the current 20% revenue run rate or expects margin compression risks that have not yet materialized. In contrast, the discounted cash flow model assigns a fair value of $48, implying that if growth assumptions hold steady and risk premiums remain constant, there may be limited upside potential from current levels unless earnings power expands significantly to justify the existing multiple.

Risk assessment relies heavily on the assumption that future performance mirrors recent trends; however, the absence of sector-specific beta data or Fama-French alpha metrics prevents a precise evaluation of whether this premium is justified by superior risk-adjusted returns compared to the broader market. The high valuation leaves little margin for error regarding execution risks, particularly if revenue growth decelerates from its current 20% trajectory or if operating leverage fails to maintain these exceptional net margins as scale increases. Investors must weigh the certainty of strong historical fundamentals against the sensitivity of a 51.6x multiple to any deviation in future cash flow projections inherent in the DCF framework.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$58$44$35
3%$68$48$37
4%$83$55$41

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $48 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
-2.86
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

83.7%
Gross Margin
14.6%
Net Margin
10.0%
ROIC
+20.0%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+87.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
18.2M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.11x
Debt / Equity
7.18x
Current Ratio
-1.7x
Net Debt / EBITDA
23.8M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.23
Act: $0.33
+43.5%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.28
Act: $0.28
0.0%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.31
Act: $0.39
+25.8%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.14
Act: $0.21
+44.8%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

30.8
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
7.02
Price/Book
130231
Avg Volume
$64.14
52W High
$33.40
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$15M
Tracked Passive Exposure
3
ETFs Holding RDVT
0.01%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$123B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XSW or VFQY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell RDVT shares regardless of RDVT's individual fundamentals. We estimate $15M of passive capital is structurally linked to RDVT through 3 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on RDVT's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 3 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in RDVT to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

RDVT Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
RDVTEpicenterVGTETFVFQYETFXSWETFNVDALow RiskAAPLLow RiskMSFTLow RiskAVGOLow RiskLRCXLow Risk
RDVT Price Drop (%)0

If RDVT (RDVT) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with RDVT. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 3 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

RDVT Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
RDVT

ETFs with Highest RDVT Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 3 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

RDVT Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does RDVT convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$18M
EBITDA
$24M
FCF Conversion
76%
Reinvestment Rate
24%
76% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

RDVT converts 76% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-0827$49.09$1,325.43
2026-04-141,342$36.59$49,103.78
2026-04-017,401$34.60$256,074.6
2026-03-31276$34.40$9,494.4
2026-03-0610$46.28$462.8
2026-03-03124$43.18$5,354.32
2026-02-27287$43.45$12,470.15
2026-02-13740$40.61$30,051.4
2026-02-11246$42.09$10,354.14
2026-02-02166$45.48$7,549.68
2026-01-23209$49.98$10,445.82
2026-01-221,503$49.21$73,962.63
2026-01-08540$53.35$28,809
2026-01-07465$52.43$24,379.95
2026-01-02384$56.95$21,868.8
2025-12-10898$56.64$50,862.72
2025-12-04758$55.48$42,053.84
2025-11-075,100$59.42$303,042
2025-11-0640,000$54.53$2.2M
2025-11-04100$54.01$5,401

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare RDVT to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.