RELIANCE.NS (RELIANCE.NS)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 2.1.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedRELIANCE.NS exhibits a modest ROIC-WACC spread of +0.8%, indicating that the company generates returns slightly above its cost of capital, but not by a significant margin. The DuPont analysis reveals that RELIANCE's return on equity (ROE) is primarily driven by leverage rather than operational efficiency or profitability margins. With an asset turnover ratio of 0.49x and net margins at 7.2%, the company relies heavily on financial leverage, as indicated by its equity multiplier of 1.93x. However, this strategy comes with risks; a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 suggests operational weakness or potential deterioration in fundamentals, while an Altman Z-Score of 2.2 indicates the company is not at immediate risk of default but may face some financial stress.
In terms of valuation, RELIANCE.NS trades at a current price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 23x, which compares to both its historical average and sector norms, suggesting that it might be moderately valued relative to the market. A discounted cash flow (DCF) fair value estimate of $2400 implies an embedded expectation for steady growth in future earnings. However, this valuation also reflects a high sensitivity to assumptions about long-term revenue growth rates. The recent insider selling activity amounts to over $12 million net sold within 90 days, which could be interpreted as management divesting shares despite the company's current financial positioning.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.5% | 9.5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $3306 | $2330 | $1637 |
| 3% | $4336 | $2802 | $1860 |
| 4% | $6396 | $3545 | $2164 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $2802 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in RELIANCE.NS to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If RELIANCE.NS (RELIANCE.NS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies HDFC Bank Ltd (HDFCBANK.NS) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with RELIANCE.NS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
RELIANCE.NS Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest RELIANCE.NS Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
RELIANCE.NS Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does RELIANCE.NS convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
RELIANCE.NS converts 34% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 66% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-0.4%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Compare RELIANCE.NS to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.