RR.L (RR.L)

$94.4B
Market Cap
16.4
P/E Ratio
1.23
Beta
0.84%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The equity exhibits robust fundamental economics, characterized by a high ROIC of 30.4% and a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, indicating superior capital efficiency and financial health relative to peers. The DuPont decomposition reveals that this return is primarily driven by exceptional profitability rather than leverage or asset turnover, evidenced by net margins expanding to 27.5% while gross margins hold steady at 29.1%. This operational excellence supports a revenue growth trajectory of 12.2% year-over-year, suggesting the business model scales effectively without sacrificing margin integrity.

Valuation metrics present a mixed picture where the current P/E ratio of 16.4x sits below typical high-growth expectations for companies with such strong margins and ROIC profiles, yet remains above what might be expected for mature utilities or low-margin industrials given the unknown sector classification. The DCF model implies a fair value of $15; comparing this anchor to current market pricing is critical to determine if the stock is trading at a discount or premium relative to its intrinsic worth derived from projected cash flows and growth assumptions.

While specific risk factor deltas, insider activity, or Fama-French alpha data were not provided in the input, the combination of high margins and solid growth suggests limited downside protection against margin compression risks unless competitive dynamics shift. The absence of sector context makes it difficult to gauge relative valuation positioning definitively, but the quantitative signals point toward a company generating significant returns on invested capital that the market has yet to fully price into its current multiple structure.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$19$14$11
3%$22$15$12
4%$27$18$13

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $15 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals

Profitability & Value Creation

29.1%
Gross Margin
27.5%
Net Margin
30.4%
ROIC
+12.2%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+131.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
3.6B
Free Cash Flow
25%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

12.84x
Debt / Equity
1.20x
Current Ratio
24.0x
Interest Coverage
-0.5x
Net Debt / EBITDA
8.1B
EBITDA

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

26.5
Forward P/E
1.96
PEG Ratio
34.80
Price/Book
36M
Avg Volume
$1420.00
52W High
$0.00
52W Low
52W Range Position

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in RR.L to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

RR.L Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
RR.LEpicenterEWUETFHSBA.LHigh RiskAZN.LLow RiskSHEL.LMed RiskBATS.LMed RiskULVR.LUnknown
RR.L Price Drop (%)0

If RR.L (RR.L) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies HSBC Holdings PLC (HSBA.L) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with RR.L. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

RR.L Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
RR.L

ETFs with Highest RR.L Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

RR.L Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does RR.L convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$3.6B
EBITDA
$8.1B
FCF Conversion
44%
Reinvestment Rate
56%
44% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

RR.L converts 44% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 56% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare RR.L to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.