SA14TG012N13 (SA14TG012N13)

$6.60T
Market Cap
18.9
P/E Ratio
0.10
Beta
5.03%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 7.2 SafeROIC−WACC +17.7%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 7.2.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency demonstrates robust quality, evidenced by a substantial ROIC-WACC spread of 17.7%, indicating that the firm generates returns significantly above its cost of capital. This high absolute return is primarily driven by exceptional profitability metrics rather than operational leverage or asset turnover; specifically, a net margin of 20.8% and gross margin of 50.2% suggest strong pricing power or favorable input costs are the core engines of value creation. Financial stability scores further corroborate this fundamental strength, with an Altman Z-Score of 7.2 signaling low bankruptcy risk and a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 reflecting solid financial health despite recent headwinds in revenue trajectory.

Despite the high-quality earnings generation, valuation metrics present a complex picture where current multiples appear stretched relative to historical norms given the negative revenue growth context. The stock trades at an 18.9x P/E ratio while the DCF model implies a fair value of $20; without specific share price data provided in the input, it is impossible to determine if the market is currently pricing in excessive optimism or discounting future cash flows appropriately relative to this intrinsic valuation anchor. The divergence between robust margins and declining year-over-year revenue growth of 7.2% suggests that investors may be anticipating a normalization in demand or facing margin compression risks not yet fully reflected in current profitability figures, creating uncertainty around the sustainability of these high-margin operations.

Risk assessment reveals a potential disconnect between fundamental quality and market performance, though specific risk factor deltas, insider activity data, or Fama-French alpha metrics were not provided to quantify this premium accurately. The combination of strong solvency indicators against shrinking top-line growth warrants close monitoring as the primary catalyst for future valuation expansion will likely depend on whether revenue contraction stabilizes while margins remain resilient.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%7.9%9.9%
2%$24$17$13
3%$31$20$14
4%$45$24$16

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $20 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
7.2
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

50.2%
Gross Margin
20.8%
Net Margin
25.5%
ROIC
7.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +17.7%— Positive value creation spread.
-7.2%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-11.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
320.4B
Free Cash Flow
100%
FCF Payout Ratio

⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.

Balance Sheet Health

0.48x
Debt / Equity
1.74x
Current Ratio
64.4x
Interest Coverage
-0.0x
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.88%
FCF Yield
807.0B
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.38
Act: $0.40
+4.5%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.36
Act: $0.38
+4.2%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.40
Act: $0.42
+2.8%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.39
Act: $0.40
+4.7%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

16.3
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
4.42
Price/Book
13M
Avg Volume
$27.48
52W High
$0.00
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$55M
Tracked Passive Exposure
2
ETFs Holding SA14TG012N13
0.14%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$39B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like SCHE or ACWI, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SA14TG012N13 shares regardless of SA14TG012N13's individual fundamentals. We estimate $55M of passive capital is structurally linked to SA14TG012N13 through 2 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on SA14TG012N13's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in SA14TG012N13 to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

SA14TG012N13 Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
SA14TG012N13EpicenterACWIETFSCHEETFTW0002330008Low RiskNVDALow RiskKYG875721634Low RiskAAPLLow RiskKYG017191142Low Risk
SA14TG012N13 Price Drop (%)0

If SA14TG012N13 (SA14TG012N13) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (TW0002330008) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with SA14TG012N13. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

SA14TG012N13 Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
SA14TG012N13

ETFs with Highest SA14TG012N13 Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 2 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

SA14TG012N13 Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does SA14TG012N13 convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$320.4B
EBITDA
$807.0B
FCF Conversion
40%
Reinvestment Rate
60%
40% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
25.5%
ROIC − WACC Spread
17.7%

SA14TG012N13 converts 40% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 60% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 17.7% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare SA14TG012N13 to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.