SAIL (SAIL)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 5/9. Beneish M-Score of -2.16 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $2 | $2 | $2 |
| 3% | $3 | $2 | $2 |
| 4% | $3 | $2 | $2 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $2 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in SAIL to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If SAIL (SAIL) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD (700) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with SAIL. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
SAIL Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest SAIL Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 3 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | 228,729 | $12.19 | $2.8M |
| 2026-05-04 | 66 | $12.07 | $796.62 |
| 2026-04-29 | 216 | $11.52 | $2,488.32 |
| 2026-04-27 | 11 | $11.95 | $131.45 |
| 2026-04-22 | 146 | $12.16 | $1,775.36 |
| 2026-04-16 | 15,784 | $11.76 | $185,619.84 |
| 2026-04-15 | 95,710 | $11.12 | $1.1M |
| 2026-04-13 | 308,877 | $10.49 | $3.2M |
| 2026-04-10 | 324,659 | $11.06 | $3.6M |
| 2026-04-02 | 49,510 | $13.36 | $661,453.6 |
| 2026-04-01 | 2,149 | $13.24 | $28,452.76 |
| 2026-03-31 | 8,937 | $12.45 | $111,265.65 |
| 2026-03-30 | 44 | $11.77 | $517.88 |
| 2026-03-26 | 4,662 | $12.33 | $57,482.46 |
| 2026-03-25 | 3,074 | $12.32 | $37,871.68 |
| 2026-03-24 | 5,181 | $12.54 | $64,969.74 |
| 2026-03-23 | 47,118 | $12.25 | $577,195.5 |
| 2026-03-20 | 51,830 | $12.34 | $639,582.2 |
| 2026-03-18 | 52,956 | $14.71 | $778,982.76 |
| 2026-03-17 | 23,738 | $15.08 | $357,969.04 |
| 2026-03-16 | 1 | $15.45 | $15.45 |
| 2026-03-13 | 1 | $15.48 | $15.48 |
| 2026-03-12 | 11,938 | $15.79 | $188,501.02 |
| 2026-03-11 | 51 | $15.32 | $781.32 |
| 2026-03-03 | 1,316 | $14.34 | $18,871.44 |
| 2026-02-24 | 67,784 | $12.86 | $871,702.24 |
| 2026-02-23 | 266,217 | $14.19 | $3.8M |
| 2026-02-18 | 7,949 | $15.65 | $124,401.85 |
| 2026-02-17 | 15,879 | $15.92 | $252,793.68 |
| 2026-02-13 | 6,954 | $15.22 | $105,839.88 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare SAIL to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.