SE0016101844 (SE0016101844)

$17.5B
Market Cap
92.0
P/E Ratio
2.79
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 1.1 Distress

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 1.1.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The company exhibits a precarious fundamental profile characterized by a modest 6.8% ROIC, which likely fails to generate value above the cost of capital given the thin net margin of 0.8%. While the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests strong balance sheet stability and profitability trends from an accounting perspective, this is offset by a concerning Altman Z-Score of 1.1, indicating elevated distress risk typical of firms nearing insolvency thresholds. The DuPont decomposition reveals that despite healthy gross margins at 36.5%, the business relies heavily on operational inefficiencies or low leverage to sustain returns, exacerbated by negative revenue growth of -5.7% YoY which undermines earnings quality and future cash flow projections.

Valuation metrics present a stark divergence between market pricing and intrinsic value estimates. The current P/E ratio of 92.0x implies that the market is assigning extreme growth expectations or speculative premiums to an entity with shrinking top-line revenue, significantly outstripping historical norms and sector averages for mature businesses. This premium appears unjustified when weighed against a DCF-derived fair value of $18, suggesting current pricing may be detached from fundamental earnings power unless implied growth rates are exceptionally high and sustainable—a scenario inconsistent with the observed contraction in sales.

The risk/reward asymmetry is heavily skewed toward downside exposure due to the combination of negative revenue momentum and an Altman Z-Score signaling potential financial distress. While the high Piotroski score offers some buffer regarding asset quality, the structural inability to expand revenues while maintaining razor-thin net margins creates a fragile operating environment where minor shocks could trigger significant value erosion. Investors must weigh whether current market sentiment is pricing in a turnaround narrative that contradicts the deteriorating top-line trajectory or if the valuation gap represents a substantial mispricing relative to cash flow realities.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$40$30$24
3%$46$33$26
4%$56$37$28

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $33 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
1.1
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

36.5%
Gross Margin
0.8%
Net Margin
6.8%
ROIC
-5.7%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+103.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.4B
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.77x
Debt / Equity
0.78x
Current Ratio
1.2x
Interest Coverage
8.53%
FCF Yield
5.1B
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.63
Act: $0.68
+8.6%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.07
Act: $0.03
-55.2%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.07
Act: $-0.01
-114.4%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $16.80
Act: $0.94
-94.4%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

31.9
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
0.81
Price/Book
5M
Avg Volume
$36.99
52W High
$15.70
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$22M
Tracked Passive Exposure
3
ETFs Holding SE0016101844
0.01%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$222B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like CLOU or IEFA, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SE0016101844 shares regardless of SE0016101844's individual fundamentals. We estimate $22M of passive capital is structurally linked to SE0016101844 through 3 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on SE0016101844's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 3 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in SE0016101844 to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

SE0016101844 Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
SE0016101844EpicenterIEFAETFIXUSETFCLOUETFAKAMMed Risk25402D102UnknownDLRMed Risk90138F102Unknown98980L101Unknown
SE0016101844 Price Drop (%)0

If SE0016101844 (SE0016101844) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (AKAM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with SE0016101844. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 3 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

SE0016101844 Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
SE0016101844

Float lock-up computed from 3 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

SE0016101844 Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does SE0016101844 convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$1.4B
EBITDA
$5.1B
FCF Conversion
28%
Reinvestment Rate
72%
28% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

SE0016101844 converts 28% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 72% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare SE0016101844 to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.