SNCY (SNCY)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 1.5.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency for SNCY presents a significant structural challenge, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -5.1%, indicating that the company is currently destroying value relative to its cost of capital. This negative return on invested capital stems from a low net margin of 4.7% against modest revenue growth of 4.7%, suggesting limited pricing power or high operating leverage pressures rather than inefficient asset turnover. While fundamental quality metrics offer mixed signals, with a moderate Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 and a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.30 implying low earnings manipulation risk, the Altman Z-Score of 1.5 flags elevated financial distress probability that warrants close monitoring of liquidity buffers.
Valuation metrics suggest the market may be pricing in an optimistic reversal of these operational dynamics despite current inefficiencies. Trading at a P/E multiple of 16.8x appears relatively stretched when weighed against the negative spread and distressed Z-Score, yet this premium could reflect expectations for margin expansion or balance sheet stabilization not currently captured in earnings. A DCF analysis places fair value at $9, which implies that current market prices are likely trading above intrinsic worth unless significant improvements in ROIC or a reduction in WACC materialize to justify the multiple.
The risk profile is further complicated by the divergence between low manipulation scores and high distress indicators; while investors may trust reported earnings quality based on the Beneish metric, the proximity to insolvency boundaries creates substantial downside volatility potential. The combination of negative capital returns and financial fragility suggests that any upward re-rating requires a fundamental shift in operational leverage or asset efficiency rather than mere multiple expansion.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 10% | 12% | 14% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $11 | $9 | $7 |
| 3% | $13 | $9 | $8 |
| 4% | $14 | $10 | $8 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=12.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $9 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in SNCY to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If SNCY (SNCY) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with SNCY. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
SNCY Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest SNCY Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
SNCY Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does SNCY convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
SNCY converts 41% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 59% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-5.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 114 | $16.17 | $1,843.38 |
| 2026-04-27 | 1,239 | $16.40 | $20,319.6 |
| 2026-04-01 | 7,509 | $16.52 | $124,048.68 |
| 2026-03-31 | 16,910 | $15.87 | $268,361.7 |
| 2026-03-11 | 393 | $16.80 | $6,602.4 |
| 2026-02-27 | 16,957 | $20.40 | $345,922.8 |
| 2026-02-09 | 37 | $21.84 | $808.08 |
| 2026-02-04 | 13 | $18.19 | $236.47 |
| 2025-12-15 | 2,040 | $14.83 | $30,253.2 |
| 2025-12-03 | 3 | $13.78 | $41.34 |
| 2025-12-01 | 5,907 | $13.70 | $80,925.9 |
| 2025-11-28 | 100 | $13.61 | $1,361 |
| 2025-11-06 | 7,480 | $12.59 | $94,173.2 |
| 2025-11-05 | 2 | $11.93 | $23.86 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare SNCY to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.