SOBO (SOBO)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.0.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency presents a notable concern, as the return on invested capital of 6.6% falls below the weighted average cost of capital of 7.9%, resulting in a negative spread that erodes intrinsic value over time. Despite this drag on equity creation, profitability metrics remain robust with net margins at 21.8% and gross margins expanding to 71.8%. However, these high-margin characteristics are being undermined by declining revenue growth of -6.3% year-over-year, a trend that coincides with an Altman Z-Score of 1.0 indicating elevated distress risk. While the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests underlying financial strength and the Beneish M-Score of -2.63 points to low earnings manipulation potential, the combination of shrinking top-line performance and capital destruction creates a conflicting fundamental picture where operational profitability masks deteriorating business viability.
Valuation multiples currently sit at 16.6x P/E, which requires contextualization against historical averages and sector peers to determine if compression is warranted given the revenue contraction. A discounted cash flow analysis suggests a fair value of $13 per share; comparing this implied price to current market levels reveals whether the stock is trading at a premium or discount relative to its intrinsic worth based on expected future cash flows. The divergence between strong margin generation and negative growth implies that any multiple expansion would need to be offset by significant turnaround execution, while the depressed valuation may reflect the market's pricing in of continued revenue erosion rather than just current profitability levels.
Risk assessment is further complicated by the Altman Z-Score proximity to insolvency thresholds, suggesting heightened vulnerability during economic downturns despite the low manipulation score. The negative ROIC-WACC spread indicates that shareholders are currently being undercompensated for capital risk, a structural issue that persists regardless of short-term margin performance. Investors must weigh whether the current valuation adequately compensates for the probability of distress or if there is sufficient catalyst potential to reverse the trajectory from revenue decline back toward sustainable growth before capital destruction accelerates further.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.9% | 9.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $23 | $8 | $0 |
| 3% | $36 | $13 | $2 |
| 4% | $62 | $21 | $6 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $13 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VSS or SPDW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SOBO shares regardless of SOBO's individual fundamentals. We estimate $32M of passive capital is structurally linked to SOBO through 2 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on SOBO's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in SOBO to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If SOBO (SOBO) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SAMSUNG ELECTR GDR REG S (SMSN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with SOBO. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
SOBO Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest SOBO Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 2 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
SOBO Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does SOBO convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
SOBO converts 50% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-1.2%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 41,792 | $36.18 | $1.5M |
| 2026-05-12 | 233 | $35.39 | $8,245.87 |
| 2026-05-11 | 1,359 | $34.71 | $47,170.89 |
| 2026-05-08 | 285 | $35.11 | $10,006.35 |
| 2026-05-07 | 242 | $34.70 | $8,397.4 |
| 2026-05-06 | 370 | $35.31 | $13,064.7 |
| 2026-05-05 | 3,543 | $35.17 | $124,607.31 |
| 2026-05-04 | 2,100 | $34.72 | $72,912 |
| 2026-04-30 | 8 | $33.33 | $266.64 |
| 2026-04-22 | 41,247 | $31.30 | $1.3M |
| 2026-04-16 | 6,080 | $32.40 | $196,992 |
| 2026-04-15 | 4,641 | $32.63 | $151,435.83 |
| 2026-04-14 | 2,189 | $33.11 | $72,477.79 |
| 2026-04-13 | 2,388 | $33.25 | $79,401 |
| 2026-04-10 | 1,345 | $33.45 | $44,990.25 |
| 2026-04-09 | 1,909 | $33.49 | $63,932.41 |
| 2026-04-02 | 712 | $32.40 | $23,068.8 |
| 2026-04-01 | 116 | $33.32 | $3,865.12 |
| 2026-03-31 | 737 | $34.26 | $25,249.62 |
| 2026-03-23 | 194 | $33.48 | $6,495.12 |
| 2026-03-13 | 28,303 | $33.06 | $935,697.18 |
| 2026-03-11 | 4,008 | $33.05 | $132,464.4 |
| 2026-03-06 | 12,950 | $33.31 | $431,364.5 |
| 2026-03-04 | 17,326 | $33.07 | $572,970.82 |
| 2026-02-23 | 29,162 | $31.27 | $911,895.74 |
| 2026-02-20 | 2,763 | $30.67 | $84,741.21 |
| 2026-02-19 | 2,012 | $29.97 | $60,299.64 |
| 2026-02-18 | 14,783 | $29.82 | $440,829.06 |
| 2026-02-17 | 13,700 | $30.29 | $414,973 |
| 2026-02-13 | 14,279 | $29.47 | $420,802.13 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare SOBO to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.