SPCX (SPCX)
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like ARKQ or ARKK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SPCX shares regardless of SPCX's individual fundamentals. We estimate $5.8B of passive capital is structurally linked to SPCX through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in SPCX to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If SPCX (SPCX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TESLA INC (TSLA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with SPCX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 12 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
SPCX Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 197 SPCX shares, reducing daily market volatility.
SPCX (SPCX) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 5.9% of the ARKQ (ARKQ) and 4.4% of the ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Across 11 tracked ETFs, approximately 38M shares (0.5% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest SPCX Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-07 | 730 | $21.98 | $16,045.4 |
| 2026-04-06 | 29 | $21.95 | $636.55 |
| 2026-03-27 | 5 | $21.86 | $109.3 |
| 2026-03-26 | 73 | $21.85 | $1,595.05 |
| 2026-03-25 | 89 | $21.85 | $1,944.65 |
| 2026-03-24 | 84 | $21.85 | $1,835.4 |
| 2026-03-23 | 84 | $21.90 | $1,839.6 |
| 2026-03-20 | 16 | $21.86 | $349.76 |
| 2026-03-06 | 31 | $21.71 | $673.01 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare SPCX to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.