SPSC (SPSC)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 8.1 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency presents a nuanced picture where the ROIC of 9.2% barely exceeds the WACC of 8.8%, yielding a marginal spread of only +0.4%. This narrow margin suggests that while the firm generates value, it does so with limited excess return potential relative to its cost of capital. However, this fundamental constraint is partially offset by robust operational quality indicators; a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 signals strong financial health and momentum, supported by an Altman Z-Score of 8.1 that indicates low distress risk. The earnings power is further reinforced by high profitability metrics, specifically a net margin of 12.4% and an impressive gross margin of 69.2%, alongside revenue growth accelerating at 17.8% year-over-year. Notably, the Beneish M-Score of -2.52 suggests management earnings quality is unlikely to be manipulated by aggressive accounting practices.
Valuation dynamics appear stretched relative to intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flow modeling, which places a fair value at $166. The current market price implies a forward P/E multiple of 22.6x, suggesting the equity market is pricing in significant future growth expectations that may exceed the conservative assumptions embedded in the DCF framework. While the high gross margins and double-digit revenue expansion provide a rationale for premium multiples, the tight ROIC-WACC spread limits the durability of these returns if capital intensity increases or margin compression occurs. The divergence between the current multiple and the implied fair value creates an environment where realized alpha will depend heavily on whether actual growth execution can sustain the high valuation premise without deteriorating operating leverage.
Risk assessment reveals a company with solid defensive characteristics, evidenced by the low distress probability from the Altman score and clean earnings signals from the Beneish metric. Nevertheless, the combination of modest capital efficiency gains against a backdrop of elevated multiple pricing introduces asymmetric risk; any deceleration in the 17.8% revenue trajectory could rapidly erode shareholder value given the limited buffer between returns on invested capital and the cost of financing. Investors must weigh the strength of earnings quality and growth rates against the sensitivity of the current valuation to potential downside scenarios where operating leverage fails to keep pace with rising input costs or competitive pressures.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6.8% | 8.8% | 10.8% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $209 | $145 | $110 |
| 3% | $258 | $166 | $121 |
| 4% | $342 | $195 | $136 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=8.8%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $166 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like SLY or XSW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SPSC shares regardless of SPSC's individual fundamentals. We estimate $121M of passive capital is structurally linked to SPSC through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on SPSC's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in SPSC to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If SPSC (SPSC) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SEMTECH CORP (SMTC) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with SPSC. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 9 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
SPSC Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest SPSC Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
SPSC Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does SPSC convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
SPSC converts 86% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 0.4% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-20 | 416 | $57.62 | $23,969.92 |
| 2026-03-02 | 25 | $56.51 | $1,412.75 |
| 2026-02-27 | 304 | $57.25 | $17,404 |
| 2026-02-23 | 124 | $57.95 | $7,185.8 |
| 2026-02-17 | 3,828 | $61.92 | $237,029.76 |
| 2026-02-13 | 700 | $64.75 | $45,325 |
| 2026-02-06 | 63 | $79.00 | $4,977 |
| 2026-02-05 | 7 | $82.60 | $578.2 |
| 2026-01-27 | 2 | $92.11 | $184.22 |
| 2026-01-20 | 2,181 | $90.07 | $196,442.67 |
| 2026-01-14 | 88 | $92.00 | $8,096 |
| 2025-12-19 | 127 | $91.49 | $11,619.23 |
| 2025-12-11 | 45 | $85.71 | $3,856.95 |
| 2025-11-25 | 356 | $81.13 | $28,882.28 |
| 2025-11-24 | 273 | $81.11 | $22,143.03 |
| 2025-11-20 | 1,067 | $78.03 | $83,258.01 |
| 2025-11-14 | 5 | $82.25 | $411.25 |
| 2025-11-06 | 12 | $81.21 | $974.52 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare SPSC to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.