TPH (TPH)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 4.3. Beneish M-Score of -1.87 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of TPH reveal a significant divergence between capital efficiency and profitability metrics, characterized by an ROIC-WACC spread of -6.0%, which indicates the company is currently destroying value relative to its cost of equity. This negative spread contrasts with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -1.87, suggesting moderate financial strength but no clear evidence of earnings manipulation despite recent revenue contraction. The DuPont decomposition highlights that while the net margin remains robust at 7.0% against a gross margin of 21.0%, this profitability is not supported by operational leverage or growth; instead, revenue has declined sharply by 22.8% year-over-year, pointing to deteriorating demand dynamics rather than pricing power or asset turnover issues as the primary drivers of performance.
Valuation analysis presents a complex picture where the current P/E ratio of 17.2x appears compressed relative to historical norms and sector peers given the negative growth trajectory, yet it does not fully reflect the underlying capital destruction implied by the -6.0% ROIC-WACC spread. A DCF model suggests a fair value of $45, which implies that current market pricing may be discounting future cash flows more aggressively than fundamental profitability alone would justify if margins were to stabilize without further revenue erosion. The market appears to be pricing in continued headwinds or potential restructuring costs rather than immediate recovery, creating a scenario where the multiple does not necessarily represent a bargain absent a credible turnaround catalyst that addresses the core capital efficiency deficit.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8.9% | 10.9% | 12.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $54 | $40 | $32 |
| 3% | $62 | $45 | $34 |
| 4% | $73 | $50 | $37 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $45 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VTWO or VCR, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TPH shares regardless of TPH's individual fundamentals. We estimate $80M of passive capital is structurally linked to TPH through 3 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on TPH's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 3 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in TPH to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If TPH (TPH) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with TPH. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 3 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
TPH Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest TPH Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
TPH Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does TPH convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
TPH converts 39% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 61% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-6.0%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 141,432 | $46.97 | $6.6M |
| 2026-05-06 | 1 | $46.83 | $46.83 |
| 2026-04-28 | 1 | $46.88 | $46.88 |
| 2026-03-27 | 61 | $46.67 | $2,846.87 |
| 2026-03-25 | 4 | $46.70 | $186.8 |
| 2026-03-23 | 8 | $46.62 | $372.96 |
| 2026-03-04 | 332 | $46.36 | $15,391.52 |
| 2026-02-27 | 273,488 | $46.30 | $12.7M |
| 2026-02-26 | 204,938 | $46.38 | $9.5M |
| 2026-02-25 | 199,218 | $46.37 | $9.2M |
| 2026-02-24 | 212,009 | $46.33 | $9.8M |
| 2026-02-23 | 159,578 | $46.31 | $7.4M |
| 2026-02-20 | 16,473 | $46.31 | $762,864.63 |
| 2026-02-17 | 258 | $46.37 | $11,963.46 |
| 2026-02-05 | 69 | $35.35 | $2,439.15 |
| 2025-12-31 | 159 | $31.77 | $5,051.43 |
| 2025-12-26 | 98 | $32.01 | $3,136.98 |
| 2025-12-10 | 34 | $32.70 | $1,111.8 |
| 2025-12-01 | 71 | $34.12 | $2,422.52 |
| 2025-11-26 | 97 | $33.84 | $3,282.48 |
| 2025-11-14 | 49 | $31.80 | $1,558.2 |
| 2025-11-03 | 6,233 | $31.85 | $198,521.05 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare TPH to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.