ULVR.L (ULVR.L)

$93.0B
Market Cap
19.0
P/E Ratio
0.46
Beta
4.05%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency of ULVR.L demonstrates robust quality, evidenced by a 15.8% ROIC that significantly outperforms typical cost of equity benchmarks for mature consumer staples. This return is primarily driven by exceptional profitability rather than operational leverage or asset intensity; the DuPont decomposition reveals an 18.8% net margin and a commanding 46.9% gross margin, indicating strong pricing power despite recent revenue contraction of -3.8%. Fundamental stability is further corroborated by a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, suggesting the balance sheet remains resilient even as top-line growth stalls, pointing to an earnings quality that relies on cost management and volume preservation rather than aggressive expansion.

Valuation metrics present a divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value models. The stock trades at a 19.0x forward P/E, which requires contextualization against the sector average and historical mean to determine if this premium is justified by its superior margins or reflects temporary scarcity in large-cap consumer names. More critically, the DCF model implies a fair value of $50 per share; comparing this absolute figure directly to current market levels reveals whether the equity is trading at a discount or premium relative to calculated cash flow potential. This gap suggests the market may be pricing in persistent margin compression or slower recovery than the underlying fundamentals support, assuming the growth rate inputs align with the observed revenue trajectory.

While specific risk factor deltas and insider activity data were not provided for this analysis, the combination of negative revenue growth and a high valuation multiple introduces execution risk regarding future volume stabilization. The discrepancy between strong profitability metrics and declining sales necessitates scrutiny on whether the 15.8% ROIC can be sustained as top-line headwinds persist or if margin erosion will eventually compress returns toward sector norms.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$63$44$33
3%$75$50$37
4%$92$58$41

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $50 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals

Profitability & Value Creation

46.9%
Gross Margin
18.8%
Net Margin
15.8%
ROIC
-3.8%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+64.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
6.8B
Free Cash Flow
66%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

3.01x
Debt / Equity
0.79x
Current Ratio
8.9x
Interest Coverage
1.8x
Net Debt / EBITDA
11.1B
EBITDA

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

14.5
Forward P/E
11.33
PEG Ratio
6.90
Price/Book
6M
Avg Volume
$5542.11
52W High
$0.00
52W Low
52W Range Position

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in ULVR.L to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

ULVR.L Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
ULVR.LEpicenterEWUETFHSBA.LHigh RiskAZN.LLow RiskSHEL.LMed RiskRR.LUnknownBATS.LMed Risk
ULVR.L Price Drop (%)0

If ULVR.L (ULVR.L) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies HSBC Holdings PLC (HSBA.L) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with ULVR.L. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

ULVR.L Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
ULVR.L

ETFs with Highest ULVR.L Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

ULVR.L Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does ULVR.L convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$6.8B
EBITDA
$11.1B
FCF Conversion
61%
Reinvestment Rate
39%
61% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

ULVR.L converts 61% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare ULVR.L to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.