WCC (WCC)

$12.6B
Market Cap
19.9
P/E Ratio
1.45
Beta
0.76%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 3/9Altman Z 3.2 SafeBeneish M -2.20 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC -2.6%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9. Beneish M-Score of -2.20 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of the company reveal a capital allocation challenge, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -2.6%, indicating that current returns on invested capital fail to cover the cost of financing. A DuPont-style analysis highlights this inefficiency: while gross margins sit at 21.1% and revenue grows at 7.8%, the net margin compresses significantly to just 2.7%, suggesting high operating leverage or expense drag is eroding profitability despite top-line expansion. Credit quality metrics present a mixed picture; an Altman Z-Score of 3.2 places the firm in the "gray zone" between safety and distress, whereas the low Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 signals deteriorating financial strength relative to its peers. Conversely, the Beneish M-Score of -2.20 offers some reassurance regarding earnings quality, implying a lower probability of manipulation compared to firms with scores near zero or positive values.

Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing in moderate growth expectations that may not align with current capital efficiency. Trading at 19.9x forward earnings, the multiple appears elevated when weighed against an ROIC-WACC spread that generates negative economic value add. Without a clear inflection point where operating leverage improves net margins or if revenue growth accelerates materially, the current valuation implies a required return premium that is difficult to justify given the -2.6% capital destruction rate. The disconnect between modest profitability and a nearly 20x multiple indicates investors are betting on future margin expansion rather than current cash flow generation capabilities.

Risk assessment relies heavily on monitoring whether the negative ROIC-WACC spread can be reversed, as sustained value destruction poses a significant downside risk to shareholder equity. While the low Beneish score mitigates immediate concerns over financial statement fraud, the combination of a weak Piotroski F-Score and a Z-score hovering near distress thresholds warrants close scrutiny of balance sheet stability during economic downturns. The market's willingness to sustain a 19.9x P/E in this environment suggests confidence in future operational improvements, yet the current data points to an asset base that is not generating sufficient returns to support such a valuation multiple without significant strategic shifts or margin recovery.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

3/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics
3.2
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.20
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

21.1%
Gross Margin
2.7%
Net Margin
8.1%
ROIC
10.7%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -2.6%— Negative spread.
+7.8%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-10.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
25.2M
Free Cash Flow
459%
FCF Payout Ratio

⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.

Balance Sheet Health

2.28x
Debt / Equity
2.20x
Current Ratio
3.2x
Interest Coverage
3.5x
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.14%
FCF Yield
1.5B
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $2.32
Act: $2.21
-4.7%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $3.36
Act: $3.39
+0.8%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $3.83
Act: $3.92
+2.3%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $3.89
Act: $3.40
-12.6%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

14.2
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
2.51
Price/Book
581474
Avg Volume
$319.68
52W High
$125.21
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$1.6B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding WCC
0.06%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$2.5T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like MDYV or IJJ, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell WCC shares regardless of WCC's individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.6B of passive capital is structurally linked to WCC through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in WCC to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

WCC Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
WCCEpicenterVTIETFVBETFVXFETFRSLow RiskUSFDLow RiskSNXMed RiskAAMed RiskOVVMed Risk
WCC Price Drop (%)0

If WCC (WCC) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies RELIANCE INC (RS) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with WCC. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 17 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

WCC Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
WCC

Float lock-up computed from 16 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

WCC Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does WCC convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$25M
EBITDA
$1.5B
FCF Conversion
2%
Reinvestment Rate
98%
2% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
8.1%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-2.6%

WCC converts 2% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 98% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-06238$350.59$83,440.42
2026-05-054,397$346.66$1.5M
2026-05-044,271$354.59$1.5M
2026-05-01447$349.12$156,056.64
2026-04-281,196$315.57$377,421.72
2026-04-20543$319.06$173,249.58
2026-04-1560$310.11$18,606.6
2026-04-0217$282.46$4,801.82
2026-03-2736$265.98$9,575.28
2026-03-2556$273.50$15,316
2026-03-128,335$265.27$2.2M
2026-03-068$281.84$2,254.72
2026-03-02998$289.50$288,921
2026-02-27156$295.84$46,151.04
2026-02-23200$296.99$59,398
2026-02-173,268$307.10$1.0M
2026-02-062,283$299.49$683,735.67
2026-02-054,705$301.37$1.4M
2026-02-03236$297.80$70,280.8
2026-01-29382$291.30$111,276.6
2026-01-2222$285.44$6,279.68
2026-01-201,023$281.63$288,107.49
2026-01-064$266.86$1,067.44
2025-12-3110,419$249.79$2.6M
2025-12-241,534$252.58$387,457.72
2025-12-2215,049$251.41$3.8M
2025-12-1820$250.39$5,007.8
2025-12-1656$258.84$14,495.04
2025-11-142,897$258.01$747,454.97
2025-11-03763$259.53$198,021.39

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare WCC to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.