AU000000RRL8 (AU000000RRL8)

$5.0B
Market Cap
10.4
P/E Ratio
1.29
Beta
3.14%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 6.4 SafeBeneish M -2.49 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 6.4.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics suggest a high-quality operator with robust capital efficiency, evidenced by an ROIC of 15.2% that likely exceeds the cost of equity for most firms in its peer set. The DuPont decomposition reveals a growth engine driven primarily by margin expansion rather than leverage or turnover; specifically, a net margin of 15.4% and gross margin near 50% indicate strong pricing power or operational control over variable costs. This profitability profile is reinforced by the Beneish M-Score of -2.49, which signals low earnings manipulation risk, while the Altman Z-Score of 6.4 confirms a comfortable safety buffer against distress. However, the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 indicates moderate financial strength with potential weaknesses in balance sheet quality or profitability trends that prevent it from being classified as an elite value candidate.

Despite these operational strengths, the current valuation multiple of 10.4x P/E appears compressed relative to its revenue growth trajectory of 30.5% YoY and superior net margins. A standard discounted cash flow analysis would likely imply a significantly higher fair value if the market were pricing in sustained high-growth rates consistent with recent performance, suggesting current prices may not fully reflect the company's earnings power or future expansion potential. The discrepancy between such aggressive top-line growth and a single-digit multiple implies either that the sector average is dragging down comparisons due to cyclical headwinds, or that investors are discounting expectations for growth sustainability despite the strong historical metrics provided.

No specific risk factor deltas, insider activity data, or Fama-French alpha figures were supplied in the input; consequently, a precise assessment of idiosyncratic risks versus market beta cannot be synthesized from the available dataset. The absence of this information limits the ability to determine if the stock exhibits characteristics typical of value, growth, or momentum factors within the broader equity universe based solely on the provided fundamental snapshot.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
6.4
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.49
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

49.9%
Gross Margin
15.4%
Net Margin
15.3%
ROIC
+30.5%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+236.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)

Balance Sheet Health

0.41x
Debt / Equity
2.61x
Current Ratio
15.4x
Interest Coverage
784.4M
EBITDA

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

4.9
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
2.65
Price/Book
4M
Avg Volume
$10.00
52W High
$3.73
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$113M
Tracked Passive Exposure
3
ETFs Holding AU000000RRL8
0.05%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$231B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like GDXJ or IEFA, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell AU000000RRL8 shares regardless of AU000000RRL8's individual fundamentals. We estimate $113M of passive capital is structurally linked to AU000000RRL8 through 3 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on AU000000RRL8's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 3 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in AU000000RRL8 to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

AU000000RRL8 Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
AU000000RRL8EpicenterIEFAETFIXUSETFGDXJETF697900108Unknown011532108Unknown192108504Unknown29446Y502Unknown780287108Unknown
AU000000RRL8 Price Drop (%)0

If AU000000RRL8 (AU000000RRL8) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Pan American Silver Corp (697900108) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with AU000000RRL8. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 3 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

AU000000RRL8 Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
AU000000RRL8

Float lock-up computed from 3 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

Compare AU000000RRL8 to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.