Healthcare

Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH)

$1.9B
Market Cap
6.8
P/E Ratio
1.59
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 6.9 SafeBeneish M 8.64 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC +0.0%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 6.8x earnings — a 90% discount to the sector average of 65.2x — AUPH is in the lower valuation range. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 6.9 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). Beneish M-Score of 8.64 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency for Aurinia Pharmaceuticals is neutral, as the return on invested capital exactly matches the weighted average cost of capital, resulting in a zero spread that indicates no economic value creation from existing assets. Despite this lack of margin expansion relative to financing costs, profitability metrics are robust with net margins exceeding 100% and gross margins near 89%, suggesting strong pricing power or low variable costs typical of specialized pharmaceuticals. Financial stability appears solid given an Altman Z-Score of 6.9 well above the distress threshold, while a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 signals healthy fundamental strength; however, the Beneish M-Score of 8.64 warrants scrutiny regarding potential earnings manipulation risks that contradicts the otherwise positive operational trajectory.

Valuation metrics present a significant divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flow analysis. Trading at approximately 6.8x forward earnings is markedly depressed compared to the sector average of 37.5x, implying the market may be over-penalizing the stock relative to its peers or discounting future growth prospects aggressively. The DCF model suggests a fair value of $22 per share, which would require substantial appreciation from current levels if realized, yet this premium assumes the company can sustain revenue growth rates near 20% annually while overcoming the capital efficiency gap where ROIC fails to outpace WACC.

The risk-reward profile is characterized by high volatility potential driven by a wide valuation compression against sector norms and specific integrity concerns flagged by the elevated Beneish M-Score. While the low multiple offers an attractive entry point for investors betting on mean reversion toward the $22 fair value, the zero ROIC-WACC spread indicates that future share price appreciation must rely entirely on increased leverage or asset turnover rather than organic capital efficiency improvements. The combination of strong top-line growth and financial solvency contrasts sharply with the market's apparent skepticism regarding earnings quality, creating a scenario where downside protection is theoretically high but upside realization depends heavily on resolving the discrepancy between reported profitability and actual economic return on assets.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →12.2%14.2%16.2%
2%$25$20$17
3%$27$22$18
4%$30$23$19

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=14.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $22 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

6.8x
AUPH P/E
65.2x
Sector Avg
-90%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
6.9
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
8.64
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

88.5%
Gross Margin
101.5%
Net Margin
14.2%
ROIC
14.2%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +0.0%— Positive spread.
+20.4%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+4893.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
135.4M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.29x
Debt / Equity
5.25x
Current Ratio
27.4x
Interest Coverage
-0.2x
Net Debt / EBITDA
7.30%
FCF Yield
137.9M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.10
Act: $0.16
+60.0%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.15
Act: $0.16
+9.1%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.16
Act: $0.23
+43.8%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.22
Act: $1.53
+606.1%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

16.9
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
3.21
Price/Book
979720
Avg Volume
$16.54
52W High
$6.83
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$11M
Tracked Passive Exposure
5
ETFs Holding AUPH
0.02%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$57B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like GWX or VFMO, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell AUPH shares regardless of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $11M of passive capital is structurally linked to AUPH through 5 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on AUPH's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 5 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

AUPH Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
AUPHEpicenterSPDWETFVHTETFVFMOETFLLYLow RiskJNJLow RiskABBVMed RiskUNHMed RiskMRKLow Risk
AUPH Price Drop (%)0

If Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with AUPH. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 5 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

AUPH Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
AUPH

Float lock-up computed from 5 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

AUPH Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$135M
EBITDA
$138M
FCF Conversion
98%
Reinvestment Rate
2%
98% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
14.2%
ROIC − WACC Spread
0.0%

Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. converts 98% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 0.0% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1415,320$16.03$245,579.6
2026-05-13122,310$15.99$2.0M
2026-04-2871,547$16.37$1.2M
2026-04-21720$15.96$11,491.2
2026-04-207,829$16.05$125,655.45
2026-04-177$15.83$110.81
2026-04-011,938$14.82$28,721.16
2026-03-23934$14.02$13,094.68
2026-02-2710,679$13.97$149,185.63
2026-02-1838$14.31$543.78
2026-02-0978,346$14.44$1.1M
2026-02-0633,518$14.26$477,966.68
2026-01-291,926$14.57$28,061.82
2026-01-281,420$14.57$20,689.4
2026-01-271,561$14.71$22,962.31
2026-01-261,700$14.53$24,701
2026-01-201,300$14.85$19,305
2026-01-15311$15.23$4,736.53
2026-01-132,729$15.28$41,699.12
2026-01-096,540$15.33$100,258.2
2026-01-0816,609$16.02$266,076.18
2025-12-261,800$16.28$29,304
2025-12-222,097$16.18$33,929.46
2025-12-112,345$15.47$36,277.15
2025-11-26255$16.28$4,151.4
2025-11-2428,380$15.68$444,998.4
2025-11-201,290$15.20$19,608
2025-11-171,797$15.35$27,583.95
2025-11-13817$15.54$12,696.18
2025-11-1234,077$15.68$534,327.36

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare AUPH to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.