CONMED Corporation (CNMD)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 22.9x earnings — a 65% discount to the sector average of 65.2x — CNMD is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.8.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of CONMED Corporation present a value-destructive trajectory, characterized by an ROIC-WACC spread of -3.6%, indicating that the firm is currently generating returns below its cost of capital and eroding intrinsic shareholder value. Despite this negative economic moat, earnings quality metrics offer conflicting signals: while the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests moderate financial strength relative to peers, the Altman Z-Score of 1.8 flags a heightened risk profile near distress territory, even as a Beneish M-Score of -2.70 points toward low earnings manipulation probability. This operational reality is further illuminated by DuPont-style decomposition; although gross margins remain robust at 54.6%, they are insufficient to drive the reported ROE given net margins have compressed significantly to just 3.4% amid revenue growth that has slowed to a modest 5.2% year-over-year pace, suggesting margin compression is outpacing volume expansion.
Valuation metrics reveal a significant divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value models. The stock trades at a forward P/E of 22.9x, which stands substantially lower than the sector average of 37.5x, implying the market has already priced in substantial downside risks or expects further deterioration in operating leverage. However, this discount appears excessive when weighed against a DCF-derived fair value estimate of $243 per share; without knowing the current trading price to calculate the implied upside or downside directly from these figures, the wide gap between the discounted cash flow model and historical sector multiples suggests the market is pricing in a scenario where growth fails to materialize or capital allocation worsens. The combination of negative economic returns and a valuation that seems disconnected from fundamental deterioration warrants close monitoring for any shift in the ROIC trajectory before assuming value restoration.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.6% | 9.6% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $296 | $200 | $136 |
| 3% | $393 | $243 | $157 |
| 4% | $587 | $309 | $184 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.6%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $243 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XHE or SLYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell CNMD shares regardless of CONMED Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $22M of passive capital is structurally linked to CNMD through 6 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on CNMD's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in CONMED Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If CONMED Corporation (CNMD) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with CNMD. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
CNMD Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest CNMD Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
CNMD Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does CONMED Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
CONMED Corporation converts 85% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-3.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 4,650 | $35.97 | $167,260.5 |
| 2026-05-06 | 97 | $36.64 | $3,554.08 |
| 2026-05-05 | 237 | $35.88 | $8,503.56 |
| 2026-05-01 | 30 | $36.66 | $1,099.8 |
| 2026-04-28 | 693 | $37.87 | $26,243.91 |
| 2026-04-27 | 138 | $38.34 | $5,290.92 |
| 2026-04-24 | 268 | $37.50 | $10,050 |
| 2026-04-22 | 800 | $38.35 | $30,680 |
| 2026-04-21 | 4,011 | $39.68 | $159,156.48 |
| 2026-04-17 | 3,937 | $37.91 | $149,251.67 |
| 2026-03-23 | 92 | $35.94 | $3,306.48 |
| 2026-03-20 | 16 | $36.80 | $588.8 |
| 2026-03-12 | 10,198 | $38.40 | $391,603.2 |
| 2026-03-05 | 4 | $42.99 | $171.96 |
| 2026-03-03 | 119 | $45.79 | $5,449.01 |
| 2026-02-26 | 1,025 | $45.98 | $47,129.5 |
| 2026-02-25 | 57,556 | $46.06 | $2.7M |
| 2026-02-20 | 25 | $44.57 | $1,114.25 |
| 2026-02-09 | 4,192 | $41.52 | $174,051.84 |
| 2026-01-22 | 63 | $41.56 | $2,618.28 |
| 2026-01-12 | 36 | $42.91 | $1,544.76 |
| 2026-01-02 | 58,211 | $40.60 | $2.4M |
| 2025-12-30 | 20 | $41.48 | $829.6 |
| 2025-12-12 | 2,615 | $39.85 | $104,207.75 |
| 2025-12-05 | 849 | $44.24 | $37,559.76 |
| 2025-11-26 | 254 | $43.26 | $10,988.04 |
| 2025-11-24 | 15 | $42.78 | $641.7 |
| 2025-11-17 | 36 | $42.04 | $1,513.44 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare CNMD to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.