Financial Services

Corebridge Financial, Inc. (CRBG)

$12.8B
Market Cap
70.1
P/E Ratio
1.10
Beta
3.49%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

CRBG trades at 70.1x earnings — a 265% premium to its sector average of 19.2x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

Corebridge Financial operates with a fundamentally distressed capital structure, evidenced by an ROIC of 0.0% and a negative DuPont ROE driven primarily by a -2.0% net margin rather than operational inefficiencies in asset turnover or excessive leverage. The company's equity multiplier of 29.62x indicates high financial gearing that amplifies losses when margins contract, while the declining revenue trajectory of -5.1% YoY suggests deteriorating top-line momentum. These fundamentals are corroborated by a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and an Altman Z-score context implying elevated distress risk, painting a picture of a firm struggling to generate value from its capital base during this period.

Valuation metrics further reflect these underlying economic challenges, with the stock trading at a significant discount relative to the sector average P/E of 18.9x. This wide divergence suggests the market is pricing in substantial downside risk and potential earnings normalization rather than growth prospects; however, without specific DCF inputs or implied growth rates provided for this asset, the absolute fair value gap remains undefined by current data points. The disparity between Corebridge's negative profitability profile and the sector mean implies that any recovery must be driven by a structural margin expansion to justify re-rating toward peer multiples.

Risk assessment is heavily skewed by aggressive insider activity, as evidenced by $750 million in net selling over the past 90 days, which signals significant distribution from those with superior information regarding future cash flows. While Fama-French alpha data was not provided to quantify style-specific outperformance or underperformance relative to size and value factors, the combination of negative earnings growth, a low Piotroski score, and substantial insider offloading creates a high-risk environment where downside protection is paramount absent evidence of an imminent operational turnaround.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

70.1x
CRBG P/E
19.2x
Sector Avg
+265%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals

Profitability & Value Creation

-2.0%
Net Margin
0.0%
ROIC
-5.1%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-116.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

-2.0%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.04x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
29.62x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
-2.6%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

28.62x
Debt / Equity
0.0x
Interest Coverage
18.4x
Net Debt / EBITDA
567.0M
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$750M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
2
Sale Transactions
2026-02-19CALDWELL STEVEN DOUGLAS JR.Grant6,874 shares
2026-02-19BYRNE JOHN PGrant6,874 shares
2026-02-19PINSKY BRYAN AGrant10,514 shares
2026-02-19CROPPER ELIZABETH BGrant9,301 shares
2026-02-19KLANE POLLY N.Grant14,153 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.14
Act: $1.16
+1.9%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.16
Act: $1.36
+17.5%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $1.08
Act: $0.96
-11.4%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.11
Act: $1.22
+9.7%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

4.8
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.24
Price/Book
6M
Avg Volume
$36.57
52W High
$22.19
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$499M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding CRBG
0.07%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$682B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like KBE or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell CRBG shares regardless of Corebridge Financial, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $499M of passive capital is structurally linked to CRBG through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on CRBG's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Corebridge Financial, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

CRBG Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
CRBGEpicenterVOETFVBETFVYMETFPNFPHigh RiskEWBCHigh RiskFHNHigh RiskWBSHigh RiskWTFCHigh Risk
CRBG Price Drop (%)0

If Corebridge Financial, Inc. (CRBG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS (PNFP) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with CRBG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 14 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

CRBG Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
CRBG

Float lock-up computed from 17 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-115,628$27.31$153,700.68
2026-05-0834,188$27.45$938,460.6
2026-05-07512,774$28.05$14.4M
2026-04-3082,547$26.95$2.2M
2026-04-297$26.93$188.51
2026-04-281,152$26.70$30,758.4
2026-04-06139,111$24.01$3.3M
2026-04-02478$24.13$11,534.14
2026-04-0129$23.86$691.94
2026-03-271,535$24.41$37,469.35
2026-03-269,626$24.17$232,660.42
2026-03-258,656$23.48$203,242.88
2026-03-23369$23.18$8,553.42
2026-03-1913,287$23.89$317,426.43
2026-03-18438$24.19$10,595.22
2026-02-2671$27.50$1,952.5
2026-02-25382$27.53$10,516.46
2026-02-05126,215$31.21$3.9M
2026-02-0457,586$30.11$1.7M
2026-01-2228$30.07$841.96
2026-01-21284,635$29.42$8.4M
2026-01-1455,021$30.03$1.7M
2025-12-2385,039$30.79$2.6M
2025-12-171,425$32.01$45,614.25
2025-12-012$30.02$60.04
2025-11-28334$30.03$10,030.02
2025-11-20120$27.90$3,348
2025-10-2877$32.14$2,474.78
2025-10-09139$32.06$4,456.34

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare CRBG to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.