Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Equinox Gold Corp. present a dichotomy between aggressive top-line expansion and constrained capital efficiency, evidenced by revenue surging 99.1% year-over-year while Return on Invested Capital remains suppressed at just 2.6%. This disconnect is further illuminated by the DuPont decomposition of its 3.8% ROE, which relies heavily on a low asset turnover ratio of 0.17x rather than operational leverage or margin expansion; although net margins sit comfortably at 12.2%, the inability to scale assets efficiently limits overall return generation. Qualitative integrity metrics offer some reassurance, with a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.51 suggesting robust financial health and low earnings manipulation risk, yet these scores must be weighed against the stark reality that current capital deployment is failing to generate returns exceeding its cost of equity.
Valuation analysis reveals significant divergence between market pricing and intrinsic value models. The stock trades at a premium relative to its historical norms and peers, with an implied multiple far exceeding the sector average P/E of 37.1x, indicating the market may be overpricing future growth expectations that have not yet materialized into sustainable profitability. This optimism appears misaligned with discounted cash flow assessments, which calculate a fair value of only $1 per share; such a wide gap between current trading levels and DCF-derived targets suggests the stock is priced for perfection in an environment where capital efficiency remains suboptimal. The combination of high growth rates failing to translate into superior ROIC implies that much of the market's valuation premium could be vulnerable if asset turnover does not improve materially.
Risk assessment highlights a concerning divergence between insider behavior and public sentiment, as significant net selling totaling $37,282,108 occurred over the last 90 days. While fundamental scores like the Piotroski metric indicate stability, this substantial insider outflow may signal that management anticipates headwinds or believes shares are currently overvalued relative to future cash flows. Investors must reconcile the impressive revenue growth and clean earnings quality against both the inefficient capital structure and the active reduction of ownership by those closest to the company's operational realities.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $2 | $1 | $1 |
| 3% | $2 | $1 | $1 |
| 4% | $3 | $2 | $1 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $1 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VSGX or SPDW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell EQX shares regardless of Equinox Gold Corp.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $12M of passive capital is structurally linked to EQX through 2 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on EQX's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Equinox Gold Corp. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (2330) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with EQX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
EQX Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest EQX Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 4 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
EQX Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Equinox Gold Corp. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Equinox Gold Corp. converts 15% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 85% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 500 | $14.49 | $7,245 |
| 2026-05-13 | 6,538 | $14.80 | $96,762.4 |
| 2026-05-12 | 145,455 | $14.86 | $2.2M |
| 2026-05-08 | 743,636 | $14.37 | $10.7M |
| 2026-05-07 | 500 | $14.37 | $7,185 |
| 2026-05-04 | 15,946 | $13.98 | $222,925.08 |
| 2026-04-29 | 7,986 | $13.83 | $110,446.38 |
| 2026-04-23 | 2,500 | $14.44 | $36,100 |
| 2026-04-20 | 801,000 | $15.61 | $12.5M |
| 2026-04-14 | 16,553 | $15.07 | $249,453.71 |
| 2026-04-02 | 74,328 | $14.94 | $1.1M |
| 2026-04-01 | 5,748 | $14.46 | $83,116.08 |
| 2026-03-31 | 20,851 | $12.94 | $269,811.94 |
| 2026-03-30 | 6,411 | $12.58 | $80,650.38 |
| 2026-03-26 | 98,029 | $13.00 | $1.3M |
| 2026-03-25 | 24,791 | $12.58 | $311,870.78 |
| 2026-03-20 | 20,931 | $12.41 | $259,753.71 |
| 2026-03-17 | 6,233 | $14.88 | $92,747.04 |
| 2026-03-16 | 104,935 | $14.57 | $1.5M |
| 2026-03-10 | 5,000 | $16.51 | $82,550 |
| 2026-03-06 | 3,274 | $16.42 | $53,759.08 |
| 2026-03-04 | 3,223 | $17.23 | $55,532.29 |
| 2026-03-03 | 37,975 | $18.75 | $712,031.25 |
| 2026-02-27 | 38,563 | $18.40 | $709,559.2 |
| 2026-02-26 | 85,580 | $18.11 | $1.5M |
| 2026-02-25 | 1,500 | $18.54 | $27,810 |
| 2026-02-24 | 586 | $17.85 | $10,460.1 |
| 2026-02-20 | 439,447 | $16.98 | $7.5M |
| 2026-02-19 | 243,339 | $15.65 | $3.8M |
| 2026-02-17 | 500 | $15.80 | $7,900 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare EQX to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.