FR0000120578 (FR0000120578)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 1.6.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency presents a significant headwind, with an ROIC of 5.5% falling short of the estimated cost of equity at 7.5%, resulting in a negative spread that suggests value destruction relative to financing costs despite robust profitability metrics. This apparent contradiction is partially explained by high leverage inherent in DuPont decomposition; while net and gross margins are exceptionally strong at 16.7% and 72.1% respectively, the return on invested capital fails to materialize as a true economic profit generator. Fundamental stability appears resilient given a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.56 indicating low earnings manipulation risk, yet an Altman Z-Score of 1.6 signals elevated distress probability that warrants scrutiny regarding the sustainability of such thin operating spreads against debt obligations.
Valuation multiples currently sit at 20.3x P/E, a premium that requires rigorous justification given the negative ROIC-WACC spread and moderate revenue growth trajectory of only 5.5% year-over-year. The divergence between current pricing and a calculated DCF fair value of $96 implies the market is either discounting future cash flow volatility associated with the low Z-Score or anticipating an acceleration in organic top-line expansion beyond historical norms. Without evidence that leverage will compress to improve ROIC, the multiple appears stretched relative to the underlying capital efficiency, creating a scenario where price appreciation must be driven almost entirely by growth rather than margin expansion or asset turnover improvements.
Risk assessment reveals a dichotomy between operational integrity and solvency constraints; while the low Beneish score supports confidence in reported earnings quality, the Altman Z-Score of 1.6 introduces substantial downside risk that could rapidly erode equity value if liquidity pressures mount. The negative return on capital further complicates the risk/reward profile, as any adverse shock to margins or turnover would likely exacerbate financial distress rather than cushion it through internal cash generation. Investors must weigh the high-margin business model against the precarious balance sheet implied by the Z-Score and sub-par ROIC before forming a view on future performance potential.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.5% | 9.5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $112 | $81 | $58 |
| 3% | $145 | $96 | $65 |
| 4% | $211 | $120 | $75 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $96 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like EFA or IEFA, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell FR0000120578 shares regardless of FR0000120578's individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.4B of passive capital is structurally linked to FR0000120578 through 6 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in FR0000120578 to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If FR0000120578 (FR0000120578) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies ASML Holding N.V. (NL0010273215) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with FR0000120578. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
FR0000120578 Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest FR0000120578 Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
FR0000120578 Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does FR0000120578 convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
FR0000120578 converts 58% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.0%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Compare FR0000120578 to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.