GB0002875804 (GB0002875804)

$93.8B
Market Cap
12.4
P/E Ratio
0.07
Beta
5.65%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 1.8 Gray ZoneROIC−WACC +2.8%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 1.8.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation profile reveals a distinct divergence between operational profitability and financial stability. While the DuPont decomposition highlights exceptional margin quality with an 83.5% gross margin and robust net margins of 30.3%, this efficiency is counterbalanced by declining revenue growth of -1.0%. The ROIC-WACC spread of +2.8% indicates that value creation remains positive but operates within a narrow band, suggesting limited excess returns relative to the cost of capital. This fundamental tension is underscored by contrasting solvency metrics: a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 signals robust financial health and operational resilience, whereas an Altman Z-Score of 1.8 flags elevated distress risk that warrants scrutiny regarding long-term viability despite current profitability.

Valuation multiples sit at 12.4x earnings, which appears compressed relative to the company's high-margin operations but lacks direct historical or sector context within the provided data. The DCF model implies a fair value of $31, creating a potential discrepancy between market pricing and intrinsic worth based on current assumptions; however, without explicit growth rate inputs used in the discounting process, it remains unclear whether this gap reflects conservative terminal values or an overestimation of future cash flow sustainability given the negative revenue trajectory. The market appears to be pricing in significant downside risk that may not fully align with the underlying earnings power suggested by the margin expansion.

The synthesis of these factors presents a complex risk-reward dynamic where high-quality margins coexist with deteriorating top-line momentum and solvency concerns. Investors must weigh whether the current valuation adequately compensates for the Altman Z-Score proximity to distress thresholds or if the Piotroski indicators suggest a temporary cyclical dip rather than structural decay. The narrow ROIC spread further implies that even in a best-case scenario, upside potential is capped unless leverage increases significantly or revenue trends reverse, leaving the equity value highly sensitive to macroeconomic shifts affecting credit conditions and sales velocity.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%7%9%
2%$33$24$14
3%$45$31$17
4%$70$44$22

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $31 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
1.8
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

83.5%
Gross Margin
30.3%
Net Margin
9.8%
ROIC
7.0%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +2.8%— Positive spread.
-1.0%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+153.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
5.6B
Free Cash Flow
93%
FCF Payout Ratio

⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.

Balance Sheet Health

1.27x
Debt / Equity
0.87x
Current Ratio
6.1x
Interest Coverage
2.0x
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.64%
FCF Yield
14.1B
EBITDA

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

11.2
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
204.38
Price/Book
4M
Avg Volume
$4876.92
52W High
$2916.00
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$1.8B
Tracked Passive Exposure
6
ETFs Holding GB0002875804
0.47%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$385B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like EFA or IEFA, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell GB0002875804 shares regardless of GB0002875804's individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.8B of passive capital is structurally linked to GB0002875804 through 6 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in GB0002875804 to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

GB0002875804 Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
GB0002875804EpicenterIEFAETFEFAETFSCHFETFNL0010273215Low RiskCH0012032048Low RiskNVDALow RiskCH0012005267Low RiskAAPLLow Risk
GB0002875804 Price Drop (%)0

If GB0002875804 (GB0002875804) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies ASML Holding N.V. (NL0010273215) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with GB0002875804. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

GB0002875804 Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
GB0002875804

Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

GB0002875804 Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does GB0002875804 convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$5.6B
EBITDA
$14.1B
FCF Conversion
40%
Reinvestment Rate
60%
40% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
9.8%
ROIC − WACC Spread
2.8%

GB0002875804 converts 40% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 60% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 2.8% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare GB0002875804 to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.