KMTUY (KMTUY)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9) with Altman Z of 1.5.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of KMTUY demonstrates a robust spread between its return on invested capital and the cost of equity, with an ROIC-WACC gap of 6.7% indicating value creation above the hurdle rate. This profitability is primarily driven by margin expansion rather than operational leverage or asset turnover; specifically, a net margin of 10.7% supported by a gross margin of 32.2% suggests pricing power and cost control are key contributors to returns. While the Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 signals strong fundamental health with eight out of nine positive indicators met, the Altman Z-Score of 1.5 presents a notable divergence, flagging potential distress risks that warrant scrutiny alongside the otherwise high-quality earnings profile.
Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing in modest growth expectations relative to historical or sector norms, as evidenced by a current P/E ratio of 13.5x coupled with revenue expansion at only 6.2% year-over-year. The disconnect between this conservative multiple and a DCF-derived fair value of $28,273 implies that the model assumes significantly higher terminal growth rates or cash flow persistence than currently reflected in trading prices. Consequently, there is a substantial gap between observed market pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flows, suggesting potential upside if underlying assumptions regarding long-term revenue drivers materialize as projected by the valuation model.
Risk assessment reveals conflicting signals: while the high Piotroski score indicates operational resilience, the sub-2.0 Altman Z-Score introduces significant downside volatility risk that could compress future multiples regardless of margin performance. The combination of moderate single-digit growth and a distress proximity metric suggests an asymmetric risk-reward profile where capital appreciation depends heavily on resolving balance sheet concerns while maintaining current operating leverage. Investors must weigh whether the implied valuation premium in the DCF model adequately compensates for the elevated probability of financial stress indicated by the Z-Score before committing capital based solely on fundamental quality metrics.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 6% | 8% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $21678 | $21678 | $14035 |
| 3% | $28273 | $28273 | $16483 |
| 4% | $41462 | $41462 | $20154 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=6.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $28273 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in KMTUY to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If KMTUY (KMTUY) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TESLA INC (TSLA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with KMTUY. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
KMTUY Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest KMTUY Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 1 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
KMTUY Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does KMTUY convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
KMTUY converts 38% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 62% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 6.7% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 24,214 | $42.26 | $1.0M |
| 2026-05-08 | 386 | $41.57 | $16,046.02 |
| 2026-04-29 | 577 | $42.49 | $24,516.73 |
| 2026-04-27 | 25 | $43.24 | $1,081 |
| 2026-04-14 | 39,078 | $44.63 | $1.7M |
| 2026-04-13 | 80,099 | $43.56 | $3.5M |
| 2026-04-02 | 61,086 | $41.66 | $2.5M |
| 2026-03-31 | 2,266 | $38.05 | $86,221.3 |
| 2026-03-30 | 132 | $39.20 | $5,174.4 |
| 2026-03-27 | 19,159 | $39.90 | $764,444.1 |
| 2026-03-26 | 43 | $40.38 | $1,736.34 |
| 2026-03-25 | 555 | $39.78 | $22,077.9 |
| 2026-03-20 | 520 | $39.88 | $20,737.6 |
| 2026-03-19 | 156 | $40.42 | $6,305.52 |
| 2026-03-17 | 210 | $42.76 | $8,979.6 |
| 2026-03-09 | 15 | $44.24 | $663.6 |
| 2026-02-26 | 1,008 | $49.49 | $49,885.92 |
| 2026-02-25 | 1,008 | $48.68 | $49,069.44 |
| 2026-02-23 | 358 | $48.81 | $17,473.98 |
| 2026-02-18 | 1,200 | $50.24 | $60,288 |
| 2026-02-17 | 1,100 | $51.09 | $56,199 |
| 2026-02-09 | 1,600 | $46.28 | $74,048 |
| 2026-02-06 | 2,800 | $45.16 | $126,448 |
| 2026-02-05 | 2,000 | $46.15 | $92,300 |
| 2026-02-04 | 2,785 | $44.50 | $123,932.5 |
| 2026-02-03 | 4,000 | $40.59 | $162,360 |
| 2026-01-13 | 638 | $34.54 | $22,036.52 |
| 2025-12-15 | 125 | $32.14 | $4,017.5 |
| 2025-12-11 | 594 | $32.41 | $19,251.54 |
| 2025-12-10 | 884 | $32.25 | $28,509 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare KMTUY to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.