KOPN (KOPN)

$484M
Market Cap
272.0
P/E Ratio
2.73
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Beneish M -0.79 Flag (> −2.22)

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9. Beneish M-Score of -0.79 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of the company present a stark dichotomy between profitability efficiency and growth trajectory. Despite maintaining healthy gross margins at 27.7% with net income still generating a 6.8% margin, revenue has contracted sharply by 23.6% year-over-year, signaling severe operational headwinds or market share erosion. This decline is compounded by a negative ROIC of -15.9%, indicating that the capital base is actively destroying value rather than creating it, a dynamic not supported by the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 which suggests moderate financial strength but lacks the robustness typically associated with high-quality compounders. The Beneish M-Score of -0.79 implies low likelihood of earnings manipulation, yet the combination of shrinking top-line growth and negative returns on invested capital creates a precarious operating environment where margin preservation cannot offset volume destruction.

Valuation metrics reflect extreme market tension rather than traditional fair value alignment. A price-to-earnings ratio of 272.0x is anomalously high relative to historical norms and sector averages, suggesting the current pricing model relies entirely on assumptions of aggressive future recovery that are not supported by recent performance data. Even if a discounted cash flow analysis were applied assuming a return to positive growth, the multiple would require an unrealistic rate of earnings expansion to justify the current share price given the negative ROIC baseline. The market appears to be pricing in a speculative turnaround narrative rather than sustainable fundamental improvement, creating a significant gap between implied future performance and realized economic reality.

The risk/reward profile is heavily skewed toward downside volatility due to the convergence of declining revenues and capital destruction. While insider activity or specific Fama-French alpha data would provide further context on market sentiment adjustments, the absence of positive momentum indicators alongside such an elevated valuation multiple suggests a high probability of mean reversion if operational metrics do not reverse course immediately. Investors must weigh whether current pricing accounts for potential restructuring benefits or simply reflects irrational exuberance in the face of deteriorating fundamentals.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
-0.79
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

27.7%
Gross Margin
6.8%
Net Margin
-15.9%
ROIC
-23.6%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+105.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-17.0M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.51x
Debt / Equity
2.70x
Current Ratio
-14.1M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.01
Act: $-0.01
-40.0%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.01
Act: $-0.03
-166.0%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.00
Act: $0.03
0.0%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

90.7
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
20.00
Price/Book
3M
Avg Volume
$4.16
52W High
$0.81
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$13M
Tracked Passive Exposure
3
ETFs Holding KOPN
0.01%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$125B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XSD or VFMO, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell KOPN shares regardless of KOPN's individual fundamentals. We estimate $13M of passive capital is structurally linked to KOPN through 3 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on KOPN's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 3 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in KOPN to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

KOPN Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
KOPNEpicenterVGTETFXSDETFVFMOETFNVDALow RiskAAPLLow RiskMSFTLow RiskMXLUnknownAVGOLow Risk
KOPN Price Drop (%)0

If KOPN (KOPN) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with KOPN. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 3 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

KOPN Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
KOPN

ETFs with Highest KOPN Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 3 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-147,519$5.02$37,745.38
2026-05-12366,739$4.97$1.8M
2026-05-1134,115$5.41$184,562.15
2026-05-0834,101$4.82$164,366.82
2026-05-0763,096$4.91$309,801.36
2026-05-05238,014$4.47$1.1M
2026-05-0412,998$4.30$55,891.4
2026-05-0134,050$4.46$151,863
2026-04-3079,153$3.93$311,071.29
2026-04-2999,182$4.00$396,728
2026-04-28124,865$3.71$463,249.15
2026-04-2738,600$3.70$142,820
2026-04-2418,798$3.53$66,356.94
2026-04-239,387$3.21$30,132.27
2026-04-226,952$2.85$19,813.2
2026-04-216,950$2.84$19,738
2026-04-2018,581$2.98$55,371.38
2026-04-1746,008$2.95$135,723.6
2026-04-161,706$2.92$4,981.52
2026-04-15400$2.72$1,088
2026-04-14106,637$2.80$298,583.6
2026-04-1363,621$2.66$169,231.86
2026-04-0910,037$2.73$27,401.01
2026-04-071,168$2.58$3,013.44
2026-04-069,038$2.62$23,679.56
2026-04-0217$2.44$41.48
2026-04-017,976$2.25$17,946
2026-03-3113,185$1.88$24,787.8
2026-03-3012,027$1.82$21,889.14
2026-03-27350$1.93$675.5

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare KOPN to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.