MOG-A (MOG-A)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 4.6 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency for MOG-A presents a notable constraint, as the return on invested capital of 9.2% falls below the weighted average cost of capital of 10.0%, resulting in a negative spread that suggests value destruction at the margin despite robust profitability metrics. This dynamic is juxtaposed against strong earnings quality indicators; a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 signals solid financial health, while an Altman Z-Score of 4.6 places the entity well within safe territory regarding bankruptcy risk. Furthermore, the Beneish M-Score of -2.43 indicates low probability of earnings manipulation, supported by healthy gross margins at 27.4% and a net margin expansion to 6.1%, all while revenue grows at a steady 7.0% year-over-year.
Valuation metrics suggest significant market premium relative to intrinsic value calculations, with the current price-to-earnings ratio of 35.7x implying aggressive growth expectations that may not be fully supported by underlying fundamentals. While the DCF model assigns a fair value of $63, the existing multiple indicates the stock is trading at a substantial discount to this calculated benchmark, potentially reflecting market skepticism about sustaining future returns or concerns over the negative ROIC-WACC spread persisting into the long term. The disparity between the high valuation multiple and the modest capital efficiency creates a tension where investors are pricing in superior growth trajectories that current operational metrics have yet to validate.
The risk-reward profile appears bifurcated, with strong defensive characteristics evidenced by low manipulation scores and moderate distress risks contrasting sharply with inefficient capital generation. If management can address the negative spread between returns on invested capital and the cost of financing, the valuation gap could narrow significantly; however, without an immediate improvement in capital efficiency, the high multiple carries elevated downside risk if growth slows or margins compress further.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $81 | $55 | $39 |
| 3% | $98 | $63 | $44 |
| 4% | $123 | $74 | $50 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $63 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
MOG-A Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does MOG-A convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
MOG-A converts 26% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 74% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-0.8%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Compare MOG-A to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.