NO0010571680 (NO0010571680)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 8.6 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation framework demonstrates robust efficiency, evidenced by a return on invested capital of 19.3% that significantly outpaces the weighted average cost of capital at 11.2%, generating an economic spread of +8.2%. This profitability is underpinned by high operating leverage, reflected in net margins of 19.4% and gross margins of 26.5%, though revenue growth has contracted slightly to -1.3% year-over-year. Financial stability appears strong given a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and an Altman Z-Score of 8.6, suggesting the entity maintains healthy solvency despite recent top-line softness; however, DuPont decomposition indicates that returns are primarily driven by margin expansion rather than asset turnover or financial leverage.
Valuation metrics present a distinct divergence between historical norms and intrinsic value models. The current price-to-earnings multiple of 5.2x sits at an extreme compression relative to typical sector expectations for firms with this quality profile, implying the market is pricing in persistent execution risks despite the company's superior capital efficiency. A discounted cash flow analysis suggests a fair value of $32, which would necessitate a substantial re-rating if current growth constraints resolve and margins stabilize. The disparity between the low multiple and implied DCF targets indicates that investor sentiment may be disproportionately focused on near-term revenue headwinds rather than the underlying quality of earnings generation.
Risk assessment reveals a mixed picture where fundamental strength contrasts with recent performance trends. While the high Altman Z-Score mitigates immediate distress concerns, the negative revenue growth delta introduces uncertainty regarding future cash flow sustainability that is not fully captured in static margin metrics. The combination of a low valuation multiple and strong balance sheet creates an asymmetric risk-reward profile contingent on whether the market corrects its pessimistic outlook or if further top-line deterioration erodes the current economic spread.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 9.2% | 11.2% | 13.2% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $70 | $54 | $44 |
| 3% | $79 | $59 | $47 |
| 4% | $91 | $66 | $51 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $59 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like IEFA or IXUS, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NO0010571680 shares regardless of NO0010571680's individual fundamentals. We estimate $11M of passive capital is structurally linked to NO0010571680 through 2 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on NO0010571680's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in NO0010571680 to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If NO0010571680 (NO0010571680) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies ASML Holding N.V. (NL0010273215) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with NO0010571680. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
NO0010571680 Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest NO0010571680 Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 2 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
NO0010571680 Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does NO0010571680 convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
NO0010571680 converts 76% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 8.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Compare NO0010571680 to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.