VOYA (VOYA)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 0.1.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of VOYA reveal a capital-intensive business model where an ROIC-WACC spread is effectively nonexistent at 0.5%, signaling that the firm generates returns barely above its cost of capital. This modest efficiency is underpinned by DuPont analysis showing that the current 9.3% ROE relies almost entirely on high financial leverage, as evidenced by a substantial equity multiplier of 25.41x, rather than operational improvements in net margins or asset turnover. The company's structural quality appears weak relative to peers, indicated by a low Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and sluggish revenue growth of just 1.2% year-over-yar, suggesting limited momentum in core business expansion despite the high margin profile.
Valuation metrics present a mixed picture where the current P/E ratio of 10.6x trades at a discount to historical norms for similar financials but remains broadly inline with sector averages given the company's specific risk characteristics. While the low multiple may reflect market skepticism regarding future growth potential, it does not necessarily imply undervaluation when weighed against the constrained ROIC and minimal revenue expansion. The DCF fair value model, though not explicitly calculated here, would likely be heavily discounted due to the assumption of limited organic growth drivers inherent in such a stagnant top-line trajectory. Consequently, the market appears pricing in a mature, low-growth phase rather than expecting significant multiple expansion or earnings acceleration.
Risk factors are further highlighted by negative insider sentiment, with $999,210 net selling over the last 90 days, which often serves as a leading indicator of management's cautious outlook on near-term prospects. Combined with the weak operational score and negligible revenue growth delta, these signals suggest that any potential alpha generation must come from capital appreciation rather than fundamental business improvement or superior risk-adjusted returns in the short term. The convergence of low insider activity, poor Piotroski metrics, and stagnant sales creates a defensive posture where downside protection may be limited by leverage risks while upside remains capped by operational inertia.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like KBE or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell VOYA shares regardless of VOYA's individual fundamentals. We estimate $510M of passive capital is structurally linked to VOYA through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on VOYA's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in VOYA to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If VOYA (VOYA) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS (PNFP) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with VOYA. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 14 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
VOYA Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest VOYA Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 14 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-04 | 7,523 | $82.60 | $621,399.8 |
| 2026-04-27 | 32,079 | $80.35 | $2.6M |
| 2026-04-24 | 52,646 | $78.87 | $4.2M |
| 2026-04-23 | 60 | $75.75 | $4,545 |
| 2026-04-13 | 24,852 | $69.94 | $1.7M |
| 2026-03-27 | 112 | $68.84 | $7,710.08 |
| 2026-03-26 | 12,284 | $68.21 | $837,891.64 |
| 2026-02-26 | 1,621 | $69.84 | $113,210.64 |
| 2026-02-18 | 123 | $74.39 | $9,149.97 |
| 2026-02-17 | 15,333 | $74.51 | $1.1M |
| 2026-02-11 | 6 | $77.24 | $463.44 |
| 2026-02-10 | 39 | $76.39 | $2,979.21 |
| 2026-02-09 | 949 | $75.90 | $72,029.1 |
| 2026-02-03 | 690 | $77.45 | $53,440.5 |
| 2026-02-02 | 690 | $76.66 | $52,895.4 |
| 2026-01-29 | 2 | $75.80 | $151.6 |
| 2026-01-22 | 1,079 | $74.61 | $80,504.19 |
| 2025-12-26 | 17 | $75.54 | $1,284.18 |
| 2025-12-22 | 100 | $75.29 | $7,529 |
| 2025-11-19 | 2,782 | $69.65 | $193,766.3 |
| 2025-11-17 | 1,339 | $70.74 | $94,720.86 |
| 2025-11-13 | 2 | $72.53 | $145.06 |
| 2025-11-06 | 13,360 | $71.13 | $950,296.8 |
| 2025-11-05 | 352 | $73.65 | $25,924.8 |
| 2025-10-27 | 68 | $73.54 | $5,000.72 |
| 2025-10-17 | 234 | $71.73 | $16,784.82 |
| 2025-10-15 | 3 | $75.77 | $227.31 |
| 2025-10-14 | 3,670 | $73.67 | $270,368.9 |
| 2025-10-08 | 1,727 | $75.11 | $129,714.97 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare VOYA to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.