VOYA (VOYA)

$6.3B
Market Cap
10.6
P/E Ratio
0.89
Beta
2.78%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Altman Z 0.1 DistressROIC−WACC -8.0%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 0.1.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of VOYA reveal a capital-intensive business model where an ROIC-WACC spread is effectively nonexistent at 0.5%, signaling that the firm generates returns barely above its cost of capital. This modest efficiency is underpinned by DuPont analysis showing that the current 9.3% ROE relies almost entirely on high financial leverage, as evidenced by a substantial equity multiplier of 25.41x, rather than operational improvements in net margins or asset turnover. The company's structural quality appears weak relative to peers, indicated by a low Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and sluggish revenue growth of just 1.2% year-over-yar, suggesting limited momentum in core business expansion despite the high margin profile.

Valuation metrics present a mixed picture where the current P/E ratio of 10.6x trades at a discount to historical norms for similar financials but remains broadly inline with sector averages given the company's specific risk characteristics. While the low multiple may reflect market skepticism regarding future growth potential, it does not necessarily imply undervaluation when weighed against the constrained ROIC and minimal revenue expansion. The DCF fair value model, though not explicitly calculated here, would likely be heavily discounted due to the assumption of limited organic growth drivers inherent in such a stagnant top-line trajectory. Consequently, the market appears pricing in a mature, low-growth phase rather than expecting significant multiple expansion or earnings acceleration.

Risk factors are further highlighted by negative insider sentiment, with $999,210 net selling over the last 90 days, which often serves as a leading indicator of management's cautious outlook on near-term prospects. Combined with the weak operational score and negligible revenue growth delta, these signals suggest that any potential alpha generation must come from capital appreciation rather than fundamental business improvement or superior risk-adjusted returns in the short term. The convergence of low insider activity, poor Piotroski metrics, and stagnant sales creates a defensive posture where downside protection may be limited by leverage risks while upside remains capped by operational inertia.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
0.1
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

8.2%
Net Margin
0.5%
ROIC
8.5%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -8.0%— Negative spread.
+1.2%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-1.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

8.2%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.04x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
25.41x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
9.3%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

24.41x
Debt / Equity
4.4x
Interest Coverage
1.2x
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.1B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
$-999,210
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
3
Sale Transactions
2026-03-02OGLE TREVORSold 3/8 qtrsSale$109,785
2026-02-20OH TONY DSold 4/8 qtrsSale$259,354
2026-02-20OGLE TREVORSold 3/8 qtrsSale$630,071
2026-02-18BIGGAR LYNNEGrant$14,678
2026-02-17LAVALLEE HEATHER HOther56,516 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.51
Act: $2.15
+42.0%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $2.06
Act: $2.40
+16.6%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $2.25
Act: $2.45
+8.9%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $2.08
Act: $1.94
-6.6%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

5.9
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.26
Price/Book
1M
Avg Volume
$79.99
52W High
$52.43
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$510M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding VOYA
0.11%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$477B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like KBE or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell VOYA shares regardless of VOYA's individual fundamentals. We estimate $510M of passive capital is structurally linked to VOYA through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on VOYA's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in VOYA to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

VOYA Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
VOYAEpicenterVBETFVYMETFVXFETFPNFPHigh RiskEWBCHigh RiskFHNHigh RiskWBSHigh RiskWTFCHigh Risk
VOYA Price Drop (%)0

If VOYA (VOYA) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS (PNFP) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with VOYA. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 14 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

VOYA Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
VOYA

Float lock-up computed from 14 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-047,523$82.60$621,399.8
2026-04-2732,079$80.35$2.6M
2026-04-2452,646$78.87$4.2M
2026-04-2360$75.75$4,545
2026-04-1324,852$69.94$1.7M
2026-03-27112$68.84$7,710.08
2026-03-2612,284$68.21$837,891.64
2026-02-261,621$69.84$113,210.64
2026-02-18123$74.39$9,149.97
2026-02-1715,333$74.51$1.1M
2026-02-116$77.24$463.44
2026-02-1039$76.39$2,979.21
2026-02-09949$75.90$72,029.1
2026-02-03690$77.45$53,440.5
2026-02-02690$76.66$52,895.4
2026-01-292$75.80$151.6
2026-01-221,079$74.61$80,504.19
2025-12-2617$75.54$1,284.18
2025-12-22100$75.29$7,529
2025-11-192,782$69.65$193,766.3
2025-11-171,339$70.74$94,720.86
2025-11-132$72.53$145.06
2025-11-0613,360$71.13$950,296.8
2025-11-05352$73.65$25,924.8
2025-10-2768$73.54$5,000.72
2025-10-17234$71.73$16,784.82
2025-10-153$75.77$227.31
2025-10-143,670$73.67$270,368.9
2025-10-081,727$75.11$129,714.97

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare VOYA to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.