ETF · Broad Market

XBI(XBI)

$154.26
+1.49%
Expense Ratio
$7.4B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
97.7%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards healthcare, which accounts for approximately 36% of its total holdings, while the remaining balance is comprised of various other sectors. This concentration in healthcare suggests that the fund is positioned to benefit from growth and innovation within this space. At a macro level, the fund's geographic exposure is not explicitly stated, implying it may have a global or domestic focus.

The top holdings are dominated by several mid-cap biotechnology names, including Moderna Therapeutics (MRNA), with each stock constituting around 1.2-1.5% of the portfolio. This concentration in biotech raises concerns about potential idiosyncratic risk and sensitivity to sector-specific developments. In comparison to the broader market, this fund appears more heavily weighted towards healthcare and growth-oriented sectors, which could be favorable in a macro environment characterized by strong economic growth and innovation-driven industries.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 08:53:10.472463+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 85/100

The investment theme implied by the XBI ticker is small-cap biotechnology, yet an examination of the top holdings reveals a significant concentration of companies operating within the broader healthcare sector rather than strictly in the biotech space. While several names like Alkermes and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals align with a pharmaceutical or biotech narrative, others such as Rhythm Pharmaceuticals and Takeda Pharmaceutical lack explicit classification tags in the provided data but are known for large-scale pharma operations that often diverge from pure-play small-cap innovation. This suggests the fund may be capturing the general healthcare recovery trend through mid-to-large cap entities disguised under sector labels, potentially diluting the intended focus on micro-cap biotech innovators despite the thematic branding associated with its ticker symbol.

Sector coherence appears mixed given that Healthcare accounts for only 36.5% of assets while holding fifty-one positions, indicating a wide dispersion beyond this single theme. The top-ten concentration stands at 15.3%, which is relatively low and suggests the fund avoids heavy reliance on any single mega-cap stock to stabilize returns; however, the lack of specific sector tags for many top holdings obscures whether these are truly differentiated small caps or larger diversified firms. Consequently, while the portfolio exhibits broad exposure within healthcare rather than a tight cluster around emerging biotech therapies, it remains distinct from a total market index due to its heavy weighting in this specific industry vertical and its exclusion of other major sectors entirely.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 15:02:14.164028+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The XBI ETF demonstrates a pronounced sector concentration within Healthcare, which accounts for 36.7% of its total assets through 51 distinct holdings. This heavy weighting suggests an investment thesis heavily anchored in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors rather than a broad-based healthcare exposure that might include established medical device or hospital operators. The presence of multiple top-five constituents such as RVMD, TVTX, TGTX, ALKS, and ARWR indicates a deliberate tilt toward mid-to-small-cap companies often characterized by high growth potential but also significant operational volatility. These specific names frequently operate in specialized therapeutic areas with limited product pipelines, implying the fund targets firms at various stages of clinical development or commercialization rather than large-cap incumbents with diversified revenue streams.

The top-10 concentration metric of 15.5% reveals a portfolio structure that is relatively dispersed compared to many concentrated equity strategies, yet the sheer dominance of the Healthcare sector creates inherent cross-sectional risk. Because nearly all exposures fall within one macroeconomic and regulatory regime, the fund's performance will be inextricably linked to broader industry-specific catalysts such as FDA approval cycles, pricing negotiations, or patent expirations. This lack of diversification across other economic sectors means that adverse events specific to drug development or healthcare policy could impact a substantial portion of the portfolio simultaneously. Consequently, while the allocation may offer amplified returns during periods of strong biotech sentiment, it also exposes investors to heightened idiosyncratic risks inherent in unproven asset classes and regulatory uncertainty without the cushioning effect of other economic drivers.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-20 17:51:29.354828+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share XBI's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of XBI's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
VHTVHT$19B13496.4%
VFMOVFMO$1B7157.5%
VTWOVTWO$15B4546.8%
VBKVBK$40B4343.6%
VXFVXF$84B3338.0%

96% of XBI's portfolio by weight is also held by VHT, which commands 3× more assets under management. When VHT receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging XBI's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofXBI's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

20.0x
Weighted P/E
4.06x
Weighted P/B
$14B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 21% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

0100020003000400092
Well Diversified
Top 5: 7.1%Top 10: 13.4%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Other63.7%Healthcare36.3%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
96% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
Low Risk

Caution: 47% of fund weight scores below 4 — indicating weak profitability or deteriorating fundamentals.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
47%
0–3 Weak
38%
4–6 Average
11%
7–9 Strong

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+79.5%
ETF 1Y Return
-10.3%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+89.7%
Multiple Expansion
P/E Inflation

XBI is up 79.5% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is -10.3%. The remaining +89.7% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 91% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of XBI's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

48% Creators
52% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)11.8%
Value Destroyers12.8%

Of XBI's analyzed weight, 48% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 52% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 25% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

36/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership10.8%
Most Crowded HoldingKRYS (17.9%)
Least CrowdedNRIX (3.4%)
Coverage30% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

XBI has a Passive Crowding Score of 36/100. On average, 10.8% of the market capitalization of XBI's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration13.4%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1APGE
APOGEE THERAPEUTICS INC
Healthcare
1.59%
2KYMR
KYMERA THERAPEUTICS INC
1.43%
3ERAS
ERASCA INC
Healthcare
1.40%
4MRNA
MODERNA INC
1.35%
5TWST
TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP
1.32%
5/9
6VKTX
VIKING THERAPEUTICS INC
1.29%
7ORKA
ORUKA THERAPEUTICS INC
1.27%
8PRAX
PRAXIS PRECISION MEDICINES I
1.26%
9CGON
CG ONCOLOGY INC
Healthcare
1.24%
10SYRE
SPYRE THERAPEUTICS INC
1.23%
11MIRM
MIRUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC
1.23%
12PTGX
PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS INC
1.23%
13DNTH
DIANTHUS THERAPEUTICS INC
Healthcare
1.23%
14NTRA
NATERA INC
Healthcare
1.22%
4/9
15RVMD
REVOLUTION MEDICINES INC
1.22%
The bottom 133 stocks in XBI account for only 80.5% of the total fund weight.Only the top 50 holdings are shown. Total holdings: 148.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how XBI’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-07-19

15 holdings · 19.5% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1APGE1.59%1,231,674
2KYMR1.43%1,302,327
3ERAS1.40%7,620,296
4MRNA1.35%2,215,303
5TWST1.32%1,503,329
6VKTX1.29%3,671,495
7ORKA1.27%1,591,181
8PRAX1.26%423,325
9CGON1.24%1,855,074
10SYRE1.23%1,356,988
11MIRM1.23%1,083,841
12PTGX1.23%963,286
13DNTH1.23%1,333,154
14NTRA1.22%470,586
15RVMD1.22%706,561

2026-07-18

15 holdings · 19.5% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1APGE1.59%1,231,674
2KYMR1.43%1,302,327
3ERAS1.40%7,620,296
4MRNA1.35%2,215,303
5TWST1.32%1,503,329
6VKTX1.29%3,671,495
7ORKA1.27%1,591,181
8PRAX1.26%423,325
9CGON1.24%1,855,074
10SYRE1.23%1,356,988
11MIRM1.23%1,083,841
12PTGX1.23%963,286
13DNTH1.23%1,333,154
14NTRA1.22%470,586
15RVMD1.22%706,561

2026-07-17

15 holdings · 19.8% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1APGE1.55%1,212,690
2ERAS1.52%7,502,780
3MRNA1.42%2,181,115
4KYMR1.39%1,282,251
5TWST1.31%1,480,145
6VKTX1.30%3,614,879
7SYRE1.30%1,336,072
8ORKA1.29%1,566,653
9CGON1.27%1,826,472
10PRAX1.27%416,815
11DNTH1.25%1,312,574
12MIRM1.23%1,067,125
13NTRA1.22%463,320
14PTGX1.22%948,418
15RYTM1.22%1,170,317

2026-07-16

15 holdings · 19.7% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1APGE1.56%1,221,278
2MRNA1.41%2,196,562
3ERAS1.40%7,555,942
4KYMR1.38%1,291,333
5VKTX1.31%3,640,491
6ORKA1.31%1,577,749
7TWST1.31%1,490,633
8PRAX1.31%419,760
9DNTH1.27%1,321,884
10SYRE1.27%1,345,534
11CGON1.26%1,839,411
12MIRM1.24%1,074,687
13RYTM1.23%1,178,620
14RVMD1.23%700,604
15NTRA1.21%466,607

2026-07-15

15 holdings · 19.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1APGE1.53%1,211,666
2MRNA1.38%2,179,235
3KYMR1.33%1,281,196
4VKTX1.30%3,611,812
5ERAS1.26%7,496,611
6TWST1.26%1,478,867
7ORKA1.25%1,565,347
8CGON1.25%1,824,974
9PRAX1.24%416,491
10DNTH1.22%1,311,571
11RVMD1.21%695,089
12MIRM1.20%1,066,244
13NTRA1.19%462,997
14PCVX1.19%2,206,681
15RYTM1.18%1,169,376

2026-07-14

15 holdings · 19.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1APGE1.49%1,201,454
2KYMR1.41%1,270,409
3MRNA1.37%2,160,881
4VKTX1.29%3,581,383
5ERAS1.28%7,433,430
6CGON1.26%1,809,587
7ORKA1.25%1,552,145
8PRAX1.25%412,972
9TWST1.23%1,466,401
10SYRE1.20%1,323,590
11MIRM1.20%1,057,251
12RVMD1.20%689,224
13SRRK1.19%2,254,071
14PCVX1.18%2,188,074
15DNTH1.18%1,300,508

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

32.1%
Annual Volatility
2.09
Sharpe (1Y)
0.69
Sharpe (3Y)
-33.0%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-55.0%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove XBI Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+1.49%(2026-07-17)

Top Contributors

+0.038%
+0.009%
+0.007%

Top Detractors

-0.028%
-0.029%
-0.053%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How XBI’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-07-1994 snapshots
Other63.7%
Healthcare36.3%
Change since 2026-03-30
Other
+2.6%
Healthcare
-2.6%
2026-03-302026-07-19

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.