Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 24.1x earnings — a 63% discount to the sector average of 65.0x — ACLS is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 7.3. Beneish M-Score of -2.07 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of Axcelis Technologies reveals a significant structural disconnect between operational returns and the cost of equity, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread contracting to -5.7%. This negative spread indicates that current operations are eroding shareholder value relative to financing costs, driven primarily by a sharp 17.6% year-over-year revenue contraction despite maintaining robust profitability metrics with net margins at 14.3% and gross margins near 45%. While the DuPont components suggest earnings quality remains intact via high margin preservation rather than leverage or turnover adjustments, fundamental health indicators present a mixed picture; a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 signals moderate financial stability but lacks strong momentum, whereas an Altman Z-Score of 7.3 and Beneish M-Score of -2.07 collectively suggest low distress risk and minimal earnings manipulation concerns.
Valuation multiples reflect this divergence between underlying fundamentals and market pricing, with the current P/E ratio at 24.1x trading substantially below the sector average of 63.0x. This compression implies that investors are heavily discounting future growth expectations in anticipation of the ongoing revenue decline, rather than penalizing for profitability deterioration alone. A DCF analysis anchors fair value at $24, suggesting that if current negative spreads and contraction rates persist without a pivot to positive cash flow generation, the market may be pricing in a prolonged period of underperformance relative to historical norms or peer benchmarks.
The risk-reward profile is further nuanced by the contrast between defensive balance sheet metrics and aggressive top-line headwinds. While the low Beneish M-Score reduces concerns regarding accounting irregularities, the widening gap between ROIC and WACC acts as a primary drag on intrinsic value growth. The market appears to have already priced in significant downside through the depressed multiple relative to peers, yet the persistent revenue decline suggests that any near-term recovery must be substantial enough to close the negative spread before valuation expansion can realistically resume.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 13.4% | 15.4% | 17.4% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $27 | $24 | $21 |
| 3% | $28 | $24 | $22 |
| 4% | $30 | $26 | $22 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=15.4%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $24 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like SLY or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ACLS shares regardless of Axcelis Technologies, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $238M of passive capital is structurally linked to ACLS through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ACLS's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Axcelis Technologies, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SEMTECH CORP (SMTC) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with ACLS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ACLS Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ACLS Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ACLS Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Axcelis Technologies, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. converts 66% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-5.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 2,582 | $161.64 | $417,354.48 |
| 2026-05-11 | 562 | $163.03 | $91,622.86 |
| 2026-05-07 | 1,930 | $171.00 | $330,030 |
| 2026-05-04 | 7 | $139.99 | $979.93 |
| 2026-04-21 | 179 | $131.02 | $23,452.58 |
| 2026-04-20 | 9,633 | $118.73 | $1.1M |
| 2026-04-17 | 42 | $118.76 | $4,987.92 |
| 2026-04-16 | 8 | $117.88 | $943.04 |
| 2026-04-14 | 1 | $110.74 | $110.74 |
| 2026-04-02 | 697 | $95.51 | $66,570.47 |
| 2026-04-01 | 5,232 | $93.08 | $486,994.56 |
| 2026-03-27 | 4 | $98.35 | $393.4 |
| 2026-03-26 | 2,269 | $100.85 | $228,828.65 |
| 2026-03-25 | 26,164 | $94.39 | $2.5M |
| 2026-03-23 | 36 | $84.43 | $3,039.48 |
| 2026-03-19 | 1 | $85.74 | $85.74 |
| 2026-03-18 | 12 | $85.15 | $1,021.8 |
| 2026-03-17 | 23 | $84.55 | $1,944.65 |
| 2026-03-05 | 9,718 | $86.62 | $841,773.16 |
| 2026-03-04 | 9,792 | $85.88 | $840,936.96 |
| 2026-03-03 | 3 | $86.58 | $259.74 |
| 2026-02-27 | 95 | $83.58 | $7,940.1 |
| 2026-02-26 | 3,212 | $80.02 | $257,024.24 |
| 2026-02-25 | 1 | $81.77 | $81.77 |
| 2026-02-24 | 83 | $78.79 | $6,539.57 |
| 2026-02-20 | 1,759 | $80.62 | $141,810.58 |
| 2026-02-19 | 1,200 | $82.01 | $98,412 |
| 2026-02-17 | 2,079 | $94.55 | $196,569.45 |
| 2026-02-12 | 31 | $91.82 | $2,846.42 |
| 2026-02-10 | 1 | $85.47 | $85.47 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ACLS to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.