Technology

Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS)

$2.8B
Market Cap
24.1
P/E Ratio
1.76
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 7.3 SafeBeneish M -2.07 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC -5.7%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 24.1x earnings — a 63% discount to the sector average of 65.0x — ACLS is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 7.3. Beneish M-Score of -2.07 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency of Axcelis Technologies reveals a significant structural disconnect between operational returns and the cost of equity, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread contracting to -5.7%. This negative spread indicates that current operations are eroding shareholder value relative to financing costs, driven primarily by a sharp 17.6% year-over-year revenue contraction despite maintaining robust profitability metrics with net margins at 14.3% and gross margins near 45%. While the DuPont components suggest earnings quality remains intact via high margin preservation rather than leverage or turnover adjustments, fundamental health indicators present a mixed picture; a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 signals moderate financial stability but lacks strong momentum, whereas an Altman Z-Score of 7.3 and Beneish M-Score of -2.07 collectively suggest low distress risk and minimal earnings manipulation concerns.

Valuation multiples reflect this divergence between underlying fundamentals and market pricing, with the current P/E ratio at 24.1x trading substantially below the sector average of 63.0x. This compression implies that investors are heavily discounting future growth expectations in anticipation of the ongoing revenue decline, rather than penalizing for profitability deterioration alone. A DCF analysis anchors fair value at $24, suggesting that if current negative spreads and contraction rates persist without a pivot to positive cash flow generation, the market may be pricing in a prolonged period of underperformance relative to historical norms or peer benchmarks.

The risk-reward profile is further nuanced by the contrast between defensive balance sheet metrics and aggressive top-line headwinds. While the low Beneish M-Score reduces concerns regarding accounting irregularities, the widening gap between ROIC and WACC acts as a primary drag on intrinsic value growth. The market appears to have already priced in significant downside through the depressed multiple relative to peers, yet the persistent revenue decline suggests that any near-term recovery must be substantial enough to close the negative spread before valuation expansion can realistically resume.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →13.4%15.4%17.4%
2%$27$24$21
3%$28$24$22
4%$30$26$22

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=15.4%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $24 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

24.1x
ACLS P/E
65.0x
Sector Avg
-63%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
7.3
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.07
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

44.9%
Gross Margin
14.3%
Net Margin
9.8%
ROIC
15.4%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -5.7%— Negative spread.
-17.6%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-40.2%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
107.0M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.32x
Debt / Equity
4.77x
Current Ratio
26.8x
Interest Coverage
-0.6x
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.95%
FCF Yield
161.2M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.38
Act: $1.04
+171.3%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.71
Act: $1.13
+59.2%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $1.00
Act: $1.21
+20.7%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.12
Act: $1.49
+33.3%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

20.3
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
2.72
Price/Book
760857
Avg Volume
$102.93
52W High
$40.40
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$238M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding ACLS
0.10%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$234B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like SLY or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ACLS shares regardless of Axcelis Technologies, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $238M of passive capital is structurally linked to ACLS through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ACLS's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Axcelis Technologies, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

ACLS Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
ACLSEpicenterVGTETFVBRETFVTWOETFSMTCUnknownSANMMed RiskVIAVHigh RiskBELow RiskFORMLow Risk
ACLS Price Drop (%)0

If Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SEMTECH CORP (SMTC) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with ACLS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

ACLS Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
ACLS

Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

ACLS Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Axcelis Technologies, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$107M
EBITDA
$161M
FCF Conversion
66%
Reinvestment Rate
34%
66% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
9.8%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-5.6%

Axcelis Technologies, Inc. converts 66% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-5.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-132,582$161.64$417,354.48
2026-05-11562$163.03$91,622.86
2026-05-071,930$171.00$330,030
2026-05-047$139.99$979.93
2026-04-21179$131.02$23,452.58
2026-04-209,633$118.73$1.1M
2026-04-1742$118.76$4,987.92
2026-04-168$117.88$943.04
2026-04-141$110.74$110.74
2026-04-02697$95.51$66,570.47
2026-04-015,232$93.08$486,994.56
2026-03-274$98.35$393.4
2026-03-262,269$100.85$228,828.65
2026-03-2526,164$94.39$2.5M
2026-03-2336$84.43$3,039.48
2026-03-191$85.74$85.74
2026-03-1812$85.15$1,021.8
2026-03-1723$84.55$1,944.65
2026-03-059,718$86.62$841,773.16
2026-03-049,792$85.88$840,936.96
2026-03-033$86.58$259.74
2026-02-2795$83.58$7,940.1
2026-02-263,212$80.02$257,024.24
2026-02-251$81.77$81.77
2026-02-2483$78.79$6,539.57
2026-02-201,759$80.62$141,810.58
2026-02-191,200$82.01$98,412
2026-02-172,079$94.55$196,569.45
2026-02-1231$91.82$2,846.42
2026-02-101$85.47$85.47

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare ACLS to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.