VTWO(VTWO)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe VTWO ETF, managing approximately $14.5 billion in assets, presents a distinct equity exposure profile characterized by significant concentration within specific small-cap sectors rather than broad market diversification. Although the fund's name might imply a wide-ranging approach, its sector weights reveal that Technology and Industrials collectively account for over 10% of total portfolio weight, with individual top holdings like Boeing representing nearly two percent alone. This structure indicates a heavy tilt toward mid-to-large cap companies within these specific industries, as evidenced by the presence of major entities such as CRDO and FN in the technology space, which contrasts sharply with typical small-cap index behavior where individual constituents usually hold negligible percentages.
Geographically, while explicit country allocations are not detailed in the provided data, the composition of top holdings suggests a primary focus on developed markets, given that all listed companies operate predominantly outside emerging economies. The inclusion of sectors such as Communication Services and Real Estate further diversifies the risk profile slightly beyond pure industrial or tech exposure, though these remain minor components compared to the dominant themes. Quantitatively, the fund's size relative to its top holdings implies a moderate level of idiosyncratic risk; for instance, if Boeing were to experience significant volatility or regulatory headwinds, it would exert a disproportionately large influence on the ETF's overall performance due to its 1.8% weighting. The presence of multiple "N/A" classifications in sector data for certain holdings also introduces ambiguity regarding precise industry categorization within the fund's internal taxonomy.
Ultimately, this instrument serves as a concentrated vehicle primarily targeting exposure to established leaders in technology and industrials rather than providing broad small-cap representation across all sectors. Investors seeking high beta or specific thematic plays on these industries may find utility here, while those prioritizing low individual stock concentration or true micro-cap breadth might observe misalignment between the fund's name and its actual asset allocation. The substantial AUM suggests strong liquidity, yet the reliance on a handful of large caps within small-cap categories creates a unique risk-return dynamic that differs from traditional sector ETFs.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 00:07:19.445236+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 85/100The thematic alignment between the VTWO name and its underlying portfolio reveals a significant divergence from typical small-cap or mid-cap growth expectations, as evidenced by the heavy weighting of established industrials and technology firms. While the fund's title suggests a focus on emerging smaller companies, the top holdings include major entities like Boeing (BE) and CDE, which are often perceived as large or mega-cap leaders within their respective sectors rather than niche small-caps. This composition indicates that the fund may be utilizing broad-based industry names to anchor its strategy, potentially prioritizing stability through familiar market players over strict adherence to a "small" capitalization theme. The presence of companies with unclear classification tags in multiple top positions further complicates the clarity of the investment thesis relative to traditional small-cap definitions.
Sector coherence remains present but is diluted by the sheer breadth of exposure across twelve distinct sectors, raising questions about whether the fund offers genuine differentiation from a broad market index. Although Technology and Industrials serve as the primary pillars with roughly equal weightings at 5.4% and 5.3%, the inclusion of substantial positions in healthcare, financial services, real estate, and energy suggests a generalized approach rather than a concentrated thematic bet on specific small-cap growth drivers. The low top-10 concentration of just 6.8% confirms that no single stock dominates, yet this dispersion mirrors the structure of a wide-market index more closely than a specialized thematic vehicle would typically exhibit. Consequently, while the portfolio avoids extreme idiosyncratic risk through diversification, its sector spread and reliance on recognizable industry leaders may undermine claims of unique small-cap exposure for investors seeking specific niche opportunities.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 02:01:36.596286+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation for VTWO presents a distinctively narrow exposure profile compared to broad market indices, with the top three sectors—Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare—collectively accounting for less than 15% of total assets. This distribution reveals an investment thesis heavily skewed toward small-cap equities rather than large-cap dominance, as evidenced by the minimal representation in traditional growth drivers like Communication Services (0.7%) or Consumer Defensive (0.5%). The fund's construction emphasizes specific sub-sectors within Industrials and Technology through its top holdings, such as BE and CRDO, suggesting a deliberate focus on niche market leaders rather than diversified industry beta. This approach implies the underlying strategy targets companies with significant growth potential relative to their size, accepting lower liquidity in exchange for higher idiosyncratic returns.
Concentration risk appears elevated due to the limited number of holdings per sector; for instance, Technology and Industrials each contain fewer than 30 positions despite representing substantial portions of the portfolio. The Top-10 concentration metric of 6.8% indicates that a small fraction of the total universe drives nearly seven percent of the fund's performance, highlighting potential vulnerability to stock-specific volatility rather than systemic sector shifts. While the allocation across Basic Materials and Energy remains modest at under 2.5%, the heavy weighting in Industrials suggests an implicit bet on capital expenditure cycles or infrastructure-related growth themes prevalent in smaller enterprises. This structural setup differentiates VTWO from core equity funds by prioritizing depth within specific small-cap niches over broad diversification, potentially resulting in higher variance during market rotations that favor large-cap value or defensive sectors.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-20 15:25:57.674288+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share VTWO's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of VTWO's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPTMSPTM | $12B | — | 358 | 49.9% |
| VXFVXF | $84B | — | 157 | 36.8% |
| VBKVBK | $40B | — | 195 | 34.8% |
| SPSMSPSM | $14B | — | 268 | 31.6% |
| VFMOVFMO | $1B | — | 158 | 30.4% |
50% of VTWO's portfolio by weight is also held by SPTM. When SPTM receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging VTWO's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofVTWO's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 53% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 43% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside VTWO collectively pay out 40% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 11% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryVTWO is up 41.3% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +17.7%. The remaining +23.6% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 39% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of VTWO's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of VTWO's analyzed weight, 31% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 69% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 24% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
VTWO has a Passive Crowding Score of 30/100. On average, 9.0% of the market capitalization of VTWO's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 15 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BE | Bloom Energy Corp. Class A Industrials | 1.84% | — | 4/9 |
| 2 | CRDO | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. Technology | 0.84% | 129.7x | 7/9 |
| 3 | FN | Fabrinet Technology | 0.74% | 56.2x | 2/9 |
| 4 | CDE | Coeur Mining Inc. Basic Materials | 0.55% | 15.6x | 7/9 |
| 5 | NXT | Nextpower Inc. Class A Technology | 0.52% | 40.6x | 6/9 |
| 6 | SATS | EchoStar Corp. Class A Communication Services | 0.50% | — | 3/9 |
| 7 | TTMI | TTM Technologies Inc. | 0.48% | 53.8x | 7/9 |
| 8 | STRL | Sterling Construction Co. Inc. | 0.46% | 48.3x | 5/9 |
| 9 | AEIS | Advanced Energy Industries Inc. Industrials | 0.43% | 79.0x | 6/9 |
| 10 | MOD | Modine Manufacturing Co. | 0.40% | 123.4x | 8/9 |
| 11 | IONQ | IonQ Inc. | 0.40% | 122.3x | — |
| 12 | SITM | SiTime Corp. | 0.38% | — | — |
| 13 | RMBS | Rambus Inc. | 0.37% | 69.6x | 6/9 |
| 14 | VIAV | Viavi Solutions Inc. | 0.36% | — | 5/9 |
| 15 | DY | Dycom Industries Inc. Industrials | 0.36% | 34.5x | 4/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how VTWO’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 8.6% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BE | 1.84% | 1,105,777 | $313.3M |
| 2 | CRDO | 0.84% | 816,574 | $142.1M |
| 3 | FN | 0.74% | 182,725 | $124.9M |
| 4 | CDE | 0.55% | 5,167,398 | $92.9M |
| 5 | NXT | 0.52% | 737,981 | $87.9M |
| 6 | SATS | 0.50% | 685,851 | $84.5M |
| 7 | TTMI | 0.48% | 517,757 | $81.9M |
| 8 | STRL | 0.46% | 150,893 | $77.8M |
| 9 | AEIS | 0.43% | 190,661 | $73.2M |
| 10 | IONQ | 0.40% | 1,495,222 | $67.5M |
| 11 | MOD | 0.40% | 265,070 | $67.5M |
| 12 | SITM | 0.38% | 113,849 | $64.0M |
| 13 | RMBS | 0.37% | 545,770 | $62.8M |
| 14 | VIAV | 0.36% | 1,166,200 | $61.1M |
| 15 | DY | 0.36% | 147,626 | $61.1M |
2026-05-23
15 holdings · 8.6% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BE | 1.84% | 1,105,777 | $313.3M |
| 2 | CRDO | 0.84% | 816,574 | $142.1M |
| 3 | FN | 0.74% | 182,725 | $124.9M |
| 4 | CDE | 0.55% | 5,167,398 | $92.9M |
| 5 | NXT | 0.52% | 737,981 | $87.9M |
| 6 | SATS | 0.50% | 685,851 | $84.5M |
| 7 | TTMI | 0.48% | 517,757 | $81.9M |
| 8 | STRL | 0.46% | 150,893 | $77.8M |
| 9 | AEIS | 0.43% | 190,661 | $73.2M |
| 10 | MOD | 0.40% | 265,070 | $67.5M |
| 11 | IONQ | 0.40% | 1,495,222 | $67.5M |
| 12 | SITM | 0.38% | 113,849 | $64.0M |
| 13 | RMBS | 0.37% | 545,770 | $62.8M |
| 14 | VIAV | 0.36% | 1,166,200 | $61.1M |
| 15 | DY | 0.36% | 147,626 | $61.1M |
2026-05-22
15 holdings · 8.6% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BE | 1.84% | 1,105,777 | $313.3M |
| 2 | CRDO | 0.84% | 816,574 | $142.1M |
| 3 | FN | 0.74% | 182,725 | $124.9M |
| 4 | CDE | 0.55% | 5,167,398 | $92.9M |
| 5 | NXT | 0.52% | 737,981 | $87.9M |
| 6 | SATS | 0.50% | 685,851 | $84.5M |
| 7 | TTMI | 0.48% | 517,757 | $81.9M |
| 8 | STRL | 0.46% | 150,893 | $77.8M |
| 9 | AEIS | 0.43% | 190,661 | $73.2M |
| 10 | IONQ | 0.40% | 1,495,222 | $67.5M |
| 11 | MOD | 0.40% | 265,070 | $67.5M |
| 12 | SITM | 0.38% | 113,849 | $64.0M |
| 13 | RMBS | 0.37% | 545,770 | $62.8M |
| 14 | VIAV | 0.36% | 1,166,200 | $61.1M |
| 15 | DY | 0.36% | 147,626 | $61.1M |
2026-05-21
15 holdings · 8.6% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BE | 1.84% | 1,105,777 | $313.3M |
| 2 | CRDO | 0.84% | 816,574 | $142.1M |
| 3 | FN | 0.74% | 182,725 | $124.9M |
| 4 | CDE | 0.55% | 5,167,398 | $92.9M |
| 5 | NXT | 0.52% | 737,981 | $87.9M |
| 6 | SATS | 0.50% | 685,851 | $84.5M |
| 7 | TTMI | 0.48% | 517,757 | $81.9M |
| 8 | STRL | 0.46% | 150,893 | $77.8M |
| 9 | AEIS | 0.43% | 190,661 | $73.2M |
| 10 | MOD | 0.40% | 265,070 | $67.5M |
| 11 | IONQ | 0.40% | 1,495,222 | $67.5M |
| 12 | SITM | 0.38% | 113,849 | $64.0M |
| 13 | RMBS | 0.37% | 545,770 | $62.8M |
| 14 | VIAV | 0.36% | 1,166,200 | $61.1M |
| 15 | DY | 0.36% | 147,626 | $61.1M |
2026-05-20
15 holdings · 8.6% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BE | 1.84% | 1,105,777 | $313.3M |
| 2 | CRDO | 0.84% | 816,574 | $142.1M |
| 3 | FN | 0.74% | 182,725 | $124.9M |
| 4 | CDE | 0.55% | 5,167,398 | $92.9M |
| 5 | NXT | 0.52% | 737,981 | $87.9M |
| 6 | SATS | 0.50% | 685,851 | $84.5M |
| 7 | TTMI | 0.48% | 517,757 | $81.9M |
| 8 | STRL | 0.46% | 150,893 | $77.8M |
| 9 | AEIS | 0.43% | 190,661 | $73.2M |
| 10 | MOD | 0.40% | 265,070 | $67.5M |
| 11 | IONQ | 0.40% | 1,495,222 | $67.5M |
| 12 | SITM | 0.38% | 113,849 | $64.0M |
| 13 | RMBS | 0.37% | 545,770 | $62.8M |
| 14 | VIAV | 0.36% | 1,166,200 | $61.1M |
| 15 | DY | 0.36% | 147,626 | $61.1M |
2026-05-19
15 holdings · 8.6% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BE | 1.84% | 1,105,777 | $313.3M |
| 2 | CRDO | 0.84% | 816,574 | $142.1M |
| 3 | FN | 0.74% | 182,725 | $124.9M |
| 4 | CDE | 0.55% | 5,167,398 | $92.9M |
| 5 | NXT | 0.52% | 737,981 | $87.9M |
| 6 | SATS | 0.50% | 685,851 | $84.5M |
| 7 | TTMI | 0.48% | 517,757 | $81.9M |
| 8 | STRL | 0.46% | 150,893 | $77.8M |
| 9 | AEIS | 0.43% | 190,661 | $73.2M |
| 10 | MOD | 0.40% | 265,070 | $67.5M |
| 11 | IONQ | 0.40% | 1,495,222 | $67.5M |
| 12 | SITM | 0.38% | 113,849 | $64.0M |
| 13 | RMBS | 0.37% | 545,770 | $62.8M |
| 14 | VIAV | 0.36% | 1,166,200 | $61.1M |
| 15 | DY | 0.36% | 147,626 | $61.1M |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove VTWO Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How VTWO’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.