MOG.A (MOG.A)
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | $0.3000 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-17 | $0.3000 | +3.4% |
| 2025-12-08 | $0.2900 | 0.0% |
| 2025-08-08 | $0.2900 | 0.0% |
| 2025-05-09 | $0.2900 | 0.0% |
| 2025-02-07 | $0.2900 | +3.6% |
| 2024-11-21 | $0.2800 | 0.0% |
| 2024-08-16 | $0.2800 | 0.0% |
| 2024-05-09 | $0.2800 | 0.0% |
| 2024-02-08 | $0.2800 | +3.7% |
| 2023-11-21 | $0.2700 | 0.0% |
| 2023-08-10 | $0.2700 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XAR or MDYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell MOG.A shares regardless of MOG.A's individual fundamentals. We estimate $731M of passive capital is structurally linked to MOG.A through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on MOG.A's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in MOG.A to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If MOG.A (MOG.A) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies CURTISS WRIGHT CORP (CW) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with MOG.A. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 11 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
MOG.A Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 11 MOG.A shares, reducing daily market volatility.
MOG.A (MOG.A) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.9% of the XAR (XAR) and 0.5% of the MDYG (MDYG). Across 11 tracked ETFs, approximately 3M shares (8.9% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest MOG.A Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
MOG.A Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for MOG.A over the past year sits near $300.80 (13% of 252-day volume). The current price of $373.33 trades 24.1% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (13% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
Compare MOG.A to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.