MDYG(MDYG)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe portfolio's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards Other sectors, which comprise approximately 60% of the holdings, indicating a significant focus on non-traditional industries. The remaining sectors are relatively underrepresented, with Industrials and Technology making up only around 21% of the total allocation. This unusual mix suggests that the fund may be investing in a broad range of companies outside of traditional sector classifications.
The top holdings reveal a moderate level of concentration risk, with no single stock dominating the portfolio. However, the presence of several mid-cap technology stocks, such as TWLO and NVT, indicates some level of exposure to growth-oriented sectors. The valuation posture is relatively expensive, with a weighted P/E ratio of 31.1x and a weighted P/B ratio of 5.86x, suggesting that investors are willing to pay a premium for the fund's holdings. A favorable macro environment would likely be one characterized by continued economic growth and stability, while an unfavorable scenario might involve rising interest rates or a decline in global trade.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 20:10:07.902103+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 65/100The thematic alignment of MDYG appears moderately consistent with its name, though the portfolio exhibits significant diversity that dilutes a singular focus. While several top holdings such as FTI and FN map clearly to energy and technology sectors respectively, a substantial portion of the largest positions lack explicit sector classifications in the provided data or belong to broad industrial categories like Consumer Cyclical and Real Estate. This heterogeneity suggests the fund may be capturing a wide array of mid-cap growth opportunities rather than adhering strictly to one specific sub-theme implied by its ticker. The presence of companies with undefined sectors among the top ten holdings indicates that the selection criteria might prioritize market capitalization or momentum over strict industry definition, potentially resulting in a basket that feels more like a diversified small-to-mid cap fund than a tightly curated thematic vehicle.
Sector coherence presents mixed signals regarding the fund's differentiation from broader indices. Industrials dominate at 13.3%, followed by Technology at 7.9% and Healthcare at 4.3%, creating an overweighted exposure relative to many pure-play thematic peers that often concentrate heavily in a single vertical like clean energy or cybersecurity. The inclusion of Financial Services, Basic Materials, and Consumer Defensive sectors further broadens the scope, suggesting the fund aims for growth across multiple economic drivers rather than isolating itself within one niche. With a top-ten concentration of only 16%, the portfolio avoids extreme reliance on individual mega-cap names, which supports stability but also reinforces the observation that MDYG functions as a diversified mid-cap strategy with thematic elements woven throughout various industries rather than serving as a pure bet on a single emerging trend.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 22:45:21.582764+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of MDYG reveals a distinct thematic focus on growth-oriented and cyclical industries rather than broad market representation. Industrials dominate the portfolio at 13.3%, followed by Technology at 7.9% and Healthcare at 4.3%, suggesting an investment thesis centered on companies with high revenue potential but often characterized by higher volatility. The inclusion of Real Estate (3.9%) and Consumer Cyclical (3.6%) holdings further reinforces a bias toward sectors sensitive to economic expansion, while the minimal exposure to Defensive (1.0%), Financial Services (2.2%), and Basic Materials (1.0%) indicates an intentional avoidance of stability-focused assets typically used for portfolio ballast during downturns. This structure implies the fund is designed to capture upside momentum in specific growth clusters rather than provide diversified market coverage or downside protection through defensive weights.
Concentration risk appears managed at a macro level, with the top ten holdings accounting for only 15.8% of assets under management. Despite this relatively low concentration metric, the distribution across sectors remains uneven; Industrials alone hold nearly four times the weight of Basic Materials and twice that of Financial Services. The presence of specific names like FTI within Energy and CW in Industrials alongside unclassified tech or healthcare leaders highlights a reliance on individual stock selection to drive performance rather than sector beta exposure. This approach suggests the fund manager believes alpha can be generated through precise picking within these cyclical domains, accepting that significant returns will hinge heavily on the success of specific industrials and technology names while leaving the portfolio vulnerable if those particular sectors underperform or rotate out of favor.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 23:45:34.27202+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share MDYG's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of MDYG's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPMDSPMD | $16B | — | 243 | 100.0% |
| SPTMSPTM | $12B | — | 243 | 100.0% |
| MDYMDY | $24B | — | 242 | 100.0% |
| VXFVXF | $84B | — | 188 | 91.4% |
| VBVB | $170B | — | 164 | 86.6% |
100% of MDYG's portfolio by weight is also held by SPMD, which commands 6× more assets under management. When SPMD receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging MDYG's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofMDYG's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 80% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 94% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside MDYG collectively pay out 48% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 31% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryMDYG is up 29.7% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +22.9%. The remaining +6.8% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 90% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of MDYG's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of MDYG's analyzed weight, 41% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 59% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 62% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
MDYG has a Passive Crowding Score of 32/100. On average, 9.7% of the market capitalization of MDYG's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 19 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FLEX | FLEX LTD | 2.72% | 65.0x | 6/9 |
| 2 | FTI | TECHNIPFMC PLC Energy | 1.63% | 26.2x | 9/9 |
| 3 | TWLO | TWILIO INC A | 1.57% | 553.6x | 6/9 |
| 4 | CW | CURTISS WRIGHT CORP Industrials | 1.51% | 54.6x | 8/9 |
| 5 | NVT | NVENT ELECTRIC PLC | 1.49% | 43.9x | 6/9 |
| 6 | FN | FABRINET Technology | 1.42% | 56.2x | 2/9 |
| 7 | P | EVERPURE INC A | 1.40% | 125.8x | — |
| 8 | MTSI | MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS H | 1.38% | 97.1x | 5/9 |
| 9 | UTHR | UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORP | 1.37% | 21.0x | 6/9 |
| 10 | MTZ | MASTEC INC | 1.34% | 60.5x | 7/9 |
| 11 | XPO | XPO INC | 1.34% | 71.7x | 5/9 |
| 12 | STRL | STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC | 1.27% | 48.3x | 5/9 |
| 13 | CRS | CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY Industrials | 1.23% | 49.3x | 7/9 |
| 14 | ATI | ATI INC Industrials | 1.23% | 57.8x | 8/9 |
| 15 | WWD | WOODWARD INC Industrials | 1.20% | 41.8x | 9/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how MDYG’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 22.1% tracked weight2026-05-23
15 holdings · 22.1% tracked weight2026-05-22
15 holdings · 22.0% tracked weight2026-05-21
15 holdings · 22.1% tracked weight2026-05-20
15 holdings · 22.1% tracked weight2026-05-19
15 holdings · 22.7% tracked weightSource: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove MDYG Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedMDYG is currently trading at $100.50, a price point that requires contextualization against its moving average envelope to assess relative value. Without specific upper or lower band boundaries provided in the dataset, it remains unclear whether this level represents an extension beyond recent statistical norms or a contraction within them. If the current price sits significantly above the mean of the envelope structure, the setup suggests potential exhaustion and opens the door for a downward drift toward central tendency values. Conversely, if $100.50 resides near the lower boundary of the range, it may indicate oversold conditions where statistical probability favors a bounce back toward the average. The absence of deviation metrics prevents a definitive conclusion on mean-reversion timing, yet the positioning relative to these averages is the primary driver for such strategies. Traders observing this level must evaluate whether the distance from the centerline implies stretched valuations or merely normal volatility fluctuation. A price detached far from its historical moving average often signals increased risk of correction as markets gravitate toward equilibrium, whereas proximity to the bands suggests stability but also potential breakout risks if momentum shifts decisively one way or another. Ultimately, the technical picture hinges entirely on where $100.50 aligns with the specific upper and lower limits of the defined envelope. If the price is hovering near the mean, the asset appears fairly valued within its recent range, offering limited immediate directional bias based solely on this metric. However, any significant displacement from the average increases
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How MDYG’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.