ETF · Broad Market

MDYG(MDYG)

$109.74
+0.71%
Expense Ratio
$2.5B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
99.9%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards Other sectors, which comprise approximately 60% of the holdings, indicating a significant focus on non-traditional industries. The remaining sectors are relatively underrepresented, with Industrials and Technology making up only around 21% of the total allocation. This unusual mix suggests that the fund may be investing in a broad range of companies outside of traditional sector classifications.

The top holdings reveal a moderate level of concentration risk, with no single stock dominating the portfolio. However, the presence of several mid-cap technology stocks, such as TWLO and NVT, indicates some level of exposure to growth-oriented sectors. The valuation posture is relatively expensive, with a weighted P/E ratio of 31.1x and a weighted P/B ratio of 5.86x, suggesting that investors are willing to pay a premium for the fund's holdings. A favorable macro environment would likely be one characterized by continued economic growth and stability, while an unfavorable scenario might involve rising interest rates or a decline in global trade.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 20:10:07.902103+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 65/100

The thematic alignment of MDYG appears moderately consistent with its name, though the portfolio exhibits significant diversity that dilutes a singular focus. While several top holdings such as FTI and FN map clearly to energy and technology sectors respectively, a substantial portion of the largest positions lack explicit sector classifications in the provided data or belong to broad industrial categories like Consumer Cyclical and Real Estate. This heterogeneity suggests the fund may be capturing a wide array of mid-cap growth opportunities rather than adhering strictly to one specific sub-theme implied by its ticker. The presence of companies with undefined sectors among the top ten holdings indicates that the selection criteria might prioritize market capitalization or momentum over strict industry definition, potentially resulting in a basket that feels more like a diversified small-to-mid cap fund than a tightly curated thematic vehicle.

Sector coherence presents mixed signals regarding the fund's differentiation from broader indices. Industrials dominate at 13.3%, followed by Technology at 7.9% and Healthcare at 4.3%, creating an overweighted exposure relative to many pure-play thematic peers that often concentrate heavily in a single vertical like clean energy or cybersecurity. The inclusion of Financial Services, Basic Materials, and Consumer Defensive sectors further broadens the scope, suggesting the fund aims for growth across multiple economic drivers rather than isolating itself within one niche. With a top-ten concentration of only 16%, the portfolio avoids extreme reliance on individual mega-cap names, which supports stability but also reinforces the observation that MDYG functions as a diversified mid-cap strategy with thematic elements woven throughout various industries rather than serving as a pure bet on a single emerging trend.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 22:45:21.582764+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The sector allocation of MDYG reveals a distinct thematic focus on growth-oriented and cyclical industries rather than broad market representation. Industrials dominate the portfolio at 13.3%, followed by Technology at 7.9% and Healthcare at 4.3%, suggesting an investment thesis centered on companies with high revenue potential but often characterized by higher volatility. The inclusion of Real Estate (3.9%) and Consumer Cyclical (3.6%) holdings further reinforces a bias toward sectors sensitive to economic expansion, while the minimal exposure to Defensive (1.0%), Financial Services (2.2%), and Basic Materials (1.0%) indicates an intentional avoidance of stability-focused assets typically used for portfolio ballast during downturns. This structure implies the fund is designed to capture upside momentum in specific growth clusters rather than provide diversified market coverage or downside protection through defensive weights.

Concentration risk appears managed at a macro level, with the top ten holdings accounting for only 15.8% of assets under management. Despite this relatively low concentration metric, the distribution across sectors remains uneven; Industrials alone hold nearly four times the weight of Basic Materials and twice that of Financial Services. The presence of specific names like FTI within Energy and CW in Industrials alongside unclassified tech or healthcare leaders highlights a reliance on individual stock selection to drive performance rather than sector beta exposure. This approach suggests the fund manager believes alpha can be generated through precise picking within these cyclical domains, accepting that significant returns will hinge heavily on the success of specific industrials and technology names while leaving the portfolio vulnerable if those particular sectors underperform or rotate out of favor.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 23:45:34.27202+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share MDYG's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of MDYG's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
SPMDSPMD$16B243100.0%
SPTMSPTM$12B243100.0%
MDYMDY$24B242100.0%
VXFVXF$84B18891.4%
VBVB$170B16486.6%

100% of MDYG's portfolio by weight is also held by SPMD, which commands 6× more assets under management. When SPMD receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging MDYG's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofMDYG's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Replaces $249/yr Morningstar

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

31.1x
Weighted P/E
5.86x
Weighted P/B
0.70%
Dividend Yield
$13B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 80% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

0100020003000400069
Well Diversified
Top 5: 8.0%Top 10: 14.7%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Growth

Sector & Cap Explorer

Other60.1%Industrials13.4%Technology7.9%Healthcare4.3%Real Estate3.9%Consumer Cyclical3.6%Energy2.7%Financial Services2.2%Basic Materials1.0%Consumer Defensive1.0%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
94% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
Moderate

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
6%
0–3 Weak
56%
4–6 Average
32%
7–9 Strong

Based on 94% of fund weight with Piotroski data.

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
48%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
0.70%
TTM Yield
Very Safe
Dividend Durability
48% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside MDYG collectively pay out 48% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 31% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+29.7%
ETF 1Y Return
+22.9%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+6.8%
Multiple Expansion
Earnings
P/E Inflation

MDYG is up 29.7% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +22.9%. The remaining +6.8% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 90% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of MDYG's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

41% Creators
59% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)25.1%
Value Destroyers36.4%

Of MDYG's analyzed weight, 41% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 59% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 62% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

32/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership9.7%
Most Crowded HoldingORA (26.3%)
Least CrowdedMEDP (4.5%)
Coverage67% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

MDYG has a Passive Crowding Score of 32/100. On average, 9.7% of the market capitalization of MDYG's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 19 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration15.8%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1FLEX
FLEX LTD
2.72%
65.0x6/9
2FTI
TECHNIPFMC PLC
Energy
1.63%
26.2x9/9
3TWLO
TWILIO INC A
1.57%
553.6x6/9
4CW
CURTISS WRIGHT CORP
Industrials
1.51%
54.6x8/9
5NVT
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC
1.49%
43.9x6/9
6FN
FABRINET
Technology
1.42%
56.2x2/9
7P
EVERPURE INC A
1.40%
125.8x
8MTSI
MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS H
1.38%
97.1x5/9
9UTHR
UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORP
1.37%
21.0x6/9
10MTZ
MASTEC INC
1.34%
60.5x7/9
11XPO
XPO INC
1.34%
71.7x5/9
12STRL
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
1.27%
48.3x5/9
13CRS
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY
Industrials
1.23%
49.3x7/9
14ATI
ATI INC
Industrials
1.23%
57.8x8/9
15WWD
WOODWARD INC
Industrials
1.20%
41.8x9/9
The bottom 228 stocks in MDYG account for only 77.9% of the total fund weight.Only the top 50 holdings are shown. Total holdings: 243.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how MDYG’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-05-24

15 holdings · 22.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1FLEX2.72%568,681
2FTI1.63%625,469
3TWLO1.57%234,465
4CW1.51%57,028
5NVT1.49%249,529
6FN1.42%55,423
7P1.40%485,019
8MTSI1.38%99,737
9UTHR1.37%66,586
10MTZ1.34%94,911
11XPO1.34%181,201
12STRL1.27%47,491
13CRS1.23%76,997
14ATI1.23%210,112
15WWD1.20%92,172

2026-05-23

15 holdings · 22.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1FLEX2.72%568,681
2FTI1.63%625,469
3TWLO1.57%234,465
4CW1.51%57,028
5NVT1.49%249,529
6FN1.42%55,423
7P1.40%485,019
8MTSI1.38%99,737
9UTHR1.37%66,586
10MTZ1.34%94,911
11XPO1.34%181,201
12STRL1.27%47,491
13CRS1.23%76,997
14ATI1.23%210,112
15WWD1.20%92,172

2026-05-22

15 holdings · 22.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1FLEX2.73%568,681
2FTI1.65%625,469
3TWLO1.62%234,465
4CW1.51%57,028
5NVT1.47%249,529
6XPO1.39%181,201
7P1.38%485,019
8UTHR1.37%66,586
9MTSI1.37%99,737
10FN1.34%55,423
11MTZ1.33%94,911
12STRL1.30%47,491
13WWD1.20%92,172
14CRS1.19%76,997
15ATI1.18%210,112

2026-05-21

15 holdings · 22.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1FLEX2.67%568,681
2FTI1.72%625,469
3TWLO1.71%234,465
4CW1.50%57,028
5NVT1.47%249,529
6UTHR1.41%66,586
7FN1.40%55,423
8P1.37%485,019
9XPO1.36%181,201
10MTZ1.36%94,911
11MTSI1.33%99,737
12STRL1.29%47,491
13WWD1.18%92,172
14ATI1.18%210,112
15CRS1.17%76,997

2026-05-20

15 holdings · 22.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1FLEX2.72%568,681
2TWLO1.71%234,465
3FTI1.69%625,469
4CW1.49%57,028
5NVT1.48%249,529
6FN1.43%55,423
7UTHR1.39%66,586
8P1.38%485,019
9STRL1.35%47,491
10MTZ1.35%94,911
11XPO1.34%181,201
12MTSI1.31%99,737
13WWD1.19%92,172
14ATI1.16%210,112
15CRS1.15%76,997

2026-05-19

15 holdings · 22.7% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1FLEX2.87%568,681
2TWLO1.70%234,465
3FTI1.63%625,469
4NVT1.54%249,529
5CW1.49%57,028
6STRL1.48%47,491
7FN1.47%55,423
8MTZ1.44%94,911
9P1.44%485,019
10UTHR1.39%66,586
11MTSI1.37%99,737
12XPO1.36%181,201
13ATI1.19%210,112
14WWD1.18%92,172
15CRS1.15%76,997

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

20.6%
Annual Volatility
1.38
Sharpe (1Y)
0.63
Sharpe (3Y)
-25.4%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-29.3%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove MDYG Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+0.71%(2026-06-02)

Top Contributors

+0.052%
+0.029%
+0.027%

Top Detractors

-0.012%
-0.012%
-0.015%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Technical Setup

AI Generated

MDYG is currently trading at $100.50, a price point that requires contextualization against its moving average envelope to assess relative value. Without specific upper or lower band boundaries provided in the dataset, it remains unclear whether this level represents an extension beyond recent statistical norms or a contraction within them. If the current price sits significantly above the mean of the envelope structure, the setup suggests potential exhaustion and opens the door for a downward drift toward central tendency values. Conversely, if $100.50 resides near the lower boundary of the range, it may indicate oversold conditions where statistical probability favors a bounce back toward the average. The absence of deviation metrics prevents a definitive conclusion on mean-reversion timing, yet the positioning relative to these averages is the primary driver for such strategies. Traders observing this level must evaluate whether the distance from the centerline implies stretched valuations or merely normal volatility fluctuation. A price detached far from its historical moving average often signals increased risk of correction as markets gravitate toward equilibrium, whereas proximity to the bands suggests stability but also potential breakout risks if momentum shifts decisively one way or another. Ultimately, the technical picture hinges entirely on where $100.50 aligns with the specific upper and lower limits of the defined envelope. If the price is hovering near the mean, the asset appears fairly valued within its recent range, offering limited immediate directional bias based solely on this metric. However, any significant displacement from the average increases

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How MDYG’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-05-2456 snapshots
Other60.1%
Industrials13.4%
Technology7.9%
Healthcare4.3%
Real Estate3.9%
Consumer Cyclical3.6%
Energy2.7%
Financial Services2.2%
Basic Materials1.0%
Consumer Defensive1.0%
Change since 2026-03-30
Other
+2.2%
Consumer Cyclical
-2.0%
Technology
+0.9%
Industrials
-0.3%
Energy
-0.3%
Consumer Defensive
-0.2%
2026-03-302026-05-24

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.