Okta, Inc. (OKTA)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicOKTA trades at 89.3x earnings — a 37% premium to its sector average of 65.0x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 2.6. DCF fair value of $177 implies 170% upside from current prices based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Okta, Inc. present a dichotomy between robust operational efficiency and modest capital deployment returns. While the DuPont decomposition highlights exceptional margin quality with a 77.4% gross margin narrowing to an 8.1% net margin, the low ROIC of 2.9% suggests that high profitability is not being effectively leveraged into shareholder value creation, likely due to limited asset turnover or leverage constraints in this service-oriented model. Despite a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicating solid financial health and clean accounting per the Beneish M-Score of -2.63, the Altman Z-Score of 2.6 places the firm in a zone warranting caution regarding long-term solvency relative to peers. The company maintains steady revenue growth at 11.8% YoY, yet this expansion has not translated into superior risk-adjusted returns, evidenced by an annual Fama-French alpha of -7.37% and negative scores on both value (HML: -0.429) and profitability (RMW: -1.001) factors.
Valuation metrics reveal a significant disconnect between current market pricing and intrinsic model estimates, with the stock trading at 48.0x forward earnings compared to a sector average of 58.2x and its own five-year historical mean of 76.6x. This represents a substantial discount of approximately 37% versus recent history, suggesting the market is pricing in heightened uncertainty or slower growth trajectories than previously assumed. However, discounted cash flow analysis implies a fair value significantly higher than current levels, projecting an upside potential of over 170%. It is critical to note that this valuation gap relies on an implied free cash flow growth rate of merely 0.7% over the next decade; such conservative assumptions may already be embedded in the low P/E multiple, potentially neutralizing the apparent DCF-driven opportunity for investors expecting rapid expansion.
The risk-reward profile appears skewed by structural headwinds rather than temporary volatility. The negative alpha and weak profitability factor indicate that Okta underperforms when adjusted for size, value, and momentum characteristics typical of high-growth tech names. While the low P/E offers a margin of safety relative to historical norms, the combination of subpar ROIC and sluggish implied cash flow growth suggests that any re-rating requires a fundamental shift in how efficiently capital is deployed or accelerated revenue compaction beyond current 11.8% rates. Investors must weigh whether the current discount compensates sufficiently for the lack of alpha generation and the specific risks highlighted by the Altman Z-Score before concluding on directional exposure.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 12% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $215 | $159 | $125 |
| 3% | $252 | $177 | $136 |
| 4% | $306 | $201 | $149 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $135.32.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $177 (+170.1%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 37% below its 5-year average P/E of 76.6x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like HACK or MDYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell OKTA shares regardless of Okta, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $976M of passive capital is structurally linked to OKTA through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on OKTA's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Okta, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Okta, Inc. (OKTA) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Broadcom Inc (AVGO) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with OKTA. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 13 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
OKTA Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 12 OKTA shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Okta, Inc. (OKTA) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.5% of the Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and 0.9% of the MDYG (MDYG). Across 13 tracked ETFs, approximately 14M shares (8.4% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest OKTA Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 13 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
OKTA Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Okta, Inc. over the past year sits near $92.55 (21% of 252-day volume). The current price of $135.32 trades 46.2% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (21% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
OKTA Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Okta, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Okta, Inc. converts 243% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 1 | $78.20 | $78.2 |
| 2026-05-11 | 900 | $83.90 | $75,510 |
| 2026-05-07 | 64 | $77.44 | $4,956.16 |
| 2026-05-04 | 7 | $75.78 | $530.46 |
| 2026-04-28 | 65 | $76.14 | $4,949.1 |
| 2026-04-24 | 65 | $76.04 | $4,942.6 |
| 2026-04-22 | 64 | $77.64 | $4,968.96 |
| 2026-04-20 | 2,000 | $72.25 | $144,500 |
| 2026-04-10 | 4,000 | $67.76 | $271,040 |
| 2026-04-09 | 13 | $76.04 | $988.52 |
| 2026-03-30 | 73 | $73.23 | $5,345.79 |
| 2026-03-23 | 86 | $78.41 | $6,743.26 |
| 2026-03-17 | 8 | $77.16 | $617.28 |
| 2026-03-16 | 100 | $79.16 | $7,916 |
| 2026-03-10 | 21,484 | $79.71 | $1.7M |
| 2026-03-09 | 200 | $80.72 | $16,144 |
| 2026-02-27 | 130 | $75.25 | $9,782.5 |
| 2026-02-23 | 3,362 | $74.29 | $249,762.98 |
| 2026-02-09 | 17,038 | $86.74 | $1.5M |
| 2026-02-06 | 30,987 | $82.15 | $2.5M |
| 2026-01-30 | 14,006 | $85.69 | $1.2M |
| 2026-01-29 | 53 | $90.74 | $4,809.22 |
| 2026-01-26 | 500 | $90.76 | $45,380 |
| 2026-01-21 | 59,701 | $87.71 | $5.2M |
| 2026-01-16 | 65,926 | $91.94 | $6.1M |
| 2026-01-15 | 90 | $93.35 | $8,401.5 |
| 2026-01-14 | 1,864 | $94.07 | $175,346.48 |
| 2026-01-13 | 216 | $93.57 | $20,211.12 |
| 2026-01-09 | 326 | $93.93 | $30,621.18 |
| 2026-01-07 | 7 | $90.36 | $632.52 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| TENB | 0.650 | 0.740 | Moderate |
| ZS | 0.576 | 0.655 | Moderate |
| CRWD | 0.576 | 0.695 | Moderate |
| S | 0.575 | 0.690 | Moderate |
| SNOW | 0.555 | 0.706 | Moderate |
| NET | 0.554 | 0.625 | Moderate |
| CDNS | 0.544 | 0.500 | Moderate |
| CRM | 0.535 | 0.568 | Moderate |
| RDWR | 0.529 | 0.653 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare OKTA to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.