RBRK (RBRK)

$82.33
-3.22%
$16.2B
Market Cap
P/E Ratio
0.63
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 0.5 DistressBeneish M -3.15 CleanROIC−WACC -27.0%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 0.5. DCF fair value of $37 implies 25% downside based on model assumptions.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency is severely compromised, evidenced by an ROIC of -16.8% that trails the cost of equity (WACC) at 10.2%, resulting in a destructive spread of -27%. This fundamental weakness persists despite robust top-line expansion with revenue growing 48.5% year-over-year and gross margins holding steady at 80.1%; however, operating leverage has failed to translate into bottom-line returns, driving the net margin deeply negative at -26.5%. While the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 suggests moderate financial stability relative to peers, the Altman Z-Score of 0.5 signals elevated distress risk, a concern partially offset by a Beneish M-Score of -3.15 that indicates low likelihood of earnings manipulation. The combination of weak profitability and high growth creates a dichotomy where top-line momentum masks deteriorating capital efficiency.

Valuation metrics present a complex picture relative to the company's operational trajectory. Although the DCF model assigns a fair value of $48 with an implied 10-year free cash flow growth rate of 17.6%, suggesting potential upside, this valuation assumes a reversion in profitability that contradicts current net loss conditions. The market appears to be pricing in significant future normalization, yet historical comparisons and sector averages are unavailable for direct benchmarking against these specific assumptions. Consequently, the disconnect between the high implied growth required by the DCF model and the negative ROIC-WACC spread necessitates a skeptical view on whether the stock is fairly valued or if it carries substantial downside risk if execution falters.

Risk-adjusted performance indicators reveal further nuance in the investment profile. The Fama-French Alpha of 4.64% annually implies strong momentum relative to its factor exposures, yet this outperformance occurs within a framework defined by negative profitability (RMW factor: -2.210) and a growth tilt that may be pricing in unsustainable expansion (HML factor: -0.182). These factor deltas suggest the stock is currently rewarded for aggressive revenue scaling while penalized for its inability to generate returns on invested capital, creating a scenario where short-term alpha could evaporate if profitability does not improve rapidly.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$82.33
Fair Value
$37
Implied Upside
-55.0%
$37IMPLIED FAIR VALUEOVERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)22%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)10.2%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
18.4%annual FCF growth priced in at $82.33

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 48% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8.2%10.2%12.2%
2%$45$32$25
3%$53$37$27
4%$65$42$30

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $82.33.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $37 (-24.7%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
0.5
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-3.15
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

80.1%
Gross Margin
-26.5%
Net Margin
-16.8%
ROIC
10.2%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -27.0%— Negative spread.
+48.5%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+69.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
237.8M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

-6.32x
Debt / Equity
1.69x
Current Ratio
-18.0x
Interest Coverage
2.47%
FCF Yield
-272.1M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.32
Act: $-0.15
+53.1%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.34
Act: $-0.03
+91.2%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.17
Act: $0.10
+158.0%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.11
Act: $0.04
+136.9%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

64.2%
Annual Volatility
-0.18
Sharpe (1Y)
-56.1%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

1.41
Market β
Mkt-RF
-0.544
Size (SMB)
Large-cap tilt
-0.182
Value (HML)
Growth tilt
-2.210
Profit (RMW)
Weak
-0.526
Invest (CMA)
Aggressive
Alpha (annual): +4.64%
R²: 34.1%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

134.9
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
-30.61
Price/Book
4M
Avg Volume
$103.00
52W High
$42.25
52W Low
66%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$570M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding RBRK
0.12%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$488B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like HACK or ARKW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell RBRK shares regardless of RBRK's individual fundamentals. We estimate $570M of passive capital is structurally linked to RBRK through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on RBRK's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in RBRK to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

RBRK Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
RBRKEpicenterVBETFVGTETFVXFETFTSLALow RiskAMDLow RiskAVGOLow RiskCSCOLow RiskPANWLow Risk
RBRK Price Drop (%)0

If RBRK (RBRK) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TESLA INC (TSLA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with RBRK. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

RBRK Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 14 RBRK shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
RBRK
Total Shares
161M
ETF Lock-Up
6.9%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
6.9%Locked Float

RBRK (RBRK) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.5% of the Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and 1.3% of the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Across 9 tracked ETFs, approximately 11M shares (6.9% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.

Float lock-up computed from 9 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

RBRK Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
RBRK
PRICE
$82.33
FLOOR (POC)
$89.33
STRENGTH
Medium
$44$47$507%$539%$567%$59$62$65$68$71$74$778%$806%$836%$82.33$8611%$89POC 12%$92$95$98$101
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for RBRK over the past year sits near $89.33 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $82.33 sits 7.8% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1351$60.47$3,083.97
2026-05-08794$61.49$48,823.06
2026-05-055,134$57.93$297,412.62
2026-04-301,202$53.68$64,523.36
2026-04-29817$54.58$44,591.86
2026-04-277,701$52.28$402,608.28
2026-04-201,500$52.34$78,510
2026-04-16157$51.36$8,063.52
2026-04-105,900$46.18$272,462
2026-03-30454$45.73$20,761.42
2026-03-2728$47.59$1,332.52
2026-03-2574,106$48.07$3.6M
2026-03-2478,985$51.18$4.0M
2026-03-2092$50.92$4,684.64
2026-03-12372$57.52$21,397.44
2026-03-0314,885$53.69$799,175.65
2026-02-271,313$54.33$71,335.29
2026-02-181$53.50$53.5
2026-02-121,519$55.12$83,727.28
2026-02-1141$55.83$2,289.03
2026-02-064,093$48.34$197,855.62
2026-02-03482$54.45$26,244.9
2026-01-22971$64.35$62,483.85
2026-01-20100$67.10$6,710
2026-01-16175$69.05$12,083.75
2026-01-146,568$70.82$465,145.76
2025-12-3160$77.87$4,672.2
2025-12-30385$78.01$30,033.85
2025-12-1611,080$79.89$885,181.2
2025-12-1564,461$81.53$5.3M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
CRWD0.5750.634Moderate
ZS0.5690.572Moderate
SNOW0.5320.549Moderate
TENB0.5280.572Moderate
OKTA0.5200.564Moderate
NOW0.5110.539Moderate
NET0.5090.507Moderate
CDNS0.5050.538Moderate
CRM0.4970.539Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare RBRK to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.