ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicNOW trades at 74.0x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 65.0x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 5.1. DCF fair value of $134 implies 50% upside from current prices based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of ServiceNow presents a nuanced picture where the ROIC-WACC spread narrows to just 0.5%, suggesting that current returns barely exceed the cost of equity, despite robust revenue growth of 20.9% and strong gross margins at 77.5%. While the DuPont decomposition reveals high leverage as the primary driver of a 13.5% ROE rather than operational margin expansion or asset turnover efficiency, credit metrics remain favorable with an Altman Z-Score of 6.7 indicating low bankruptcy risk. However, fundamental stability is tempered by a modest Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and negative profitability factor exposure (-0.811), signaling that recent earnings quality may be deteriorating relative to historical trends despite the lack of financial distress indicators captured in the Beneish M-Score.
Valuation metrics highlight a significant premium over the sector average, with a current P/E of 61.1x substantially exceeding the technology sector mean of 42.2x and implying aggressive growth expectations embedded in pricing models. This high multiple contrasts sharply with a DCF-derived fair value that suggests potential upside based on an assumed long-term free cash flow growth rate of 11.8%, creating a divergence between market sentiment and intrinsic valuation calculations. The stock exhibits a distinct tilt toward the Growth factor rather than Value, as evidenced by negative HML exposure (-0.838), indicating that current prices are heavily weighted to future expansion prospects rather than current asset profitability or book value recovery.
Risk-adjusted performance data reveals substantial idiosyncratic volatility, with an annual Fama-French Alpha of -62.82% suggesting the stock has underperformed its risk factors over time despite strong top-line momentum. While insider activity shows a net inflow of $1.3 million in buying pressure over the last 90 days, this positive signal must be weighed against the weak profitability factor and narrow return spread that constrain downside protection if growth decelerates. The combination of elevated valuation multiples, negative risk premium adjustments, and moderate fundamental scores creates an environment where price appreciation relies entirely on sustaining high single-digit double-digit free cash flow expansion to justify current equity levels.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 21% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8.9% | 10.9% | 12.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $160 | $122 | $97 |
| 3% | $182 | $134 | $105 |
| 4% | $214 | $149 | $114 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $127.65.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $134 (+50.1%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 36% below its 5-year average P/E of 77.5x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe 50-day moving average of NOW is below the 200-day moving average, indicating a potential downtrend in the stock. The RSI at 51.3 suggests that near-term momentum is currently neutral to slightly bullish but not overbought.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like CLOU or XNTK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NOW shares regardless of ServiceNow, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $12.3B of passive capital is structurally linked to NOW through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in ServiceNow, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NVIDIA CORP (NVDA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with NOW. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 30 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
NOW Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 8 NOW shares, reducing daily market volatility.
ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.1% of the CLOU (CLOU) and 1.3% of the XNTK (XNTK). Across 30 tracked ETFs, approximately 131M shares (12.7% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest NOW Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
NOW Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for ServiceNow, Inc. over the past year sits near $104.03 (16% of 252-day volume). The current price of $127.65 trades 22.7% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (16% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
NOW Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does ServiceNow, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
ServiceNow, Inc. converts 150% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 0.7% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 175 | $87.05 | $15,233.75 |
| 2026-05-11 | 200 | $91.18 | $18,236 |
| 2026-05-08 | 777 | $93.59 | $72,719.43 |
| 2026-05-04 | 1 | $91.16 | $91.16 |
| 2026-05-01 | 20,343 | $88.31 | $1.8M |
| 2026-04-27 | 41,166 | $90.17 | $3.7M |
| 2026-04-24 | 70 | $84.78 | $5,934.6 |
| 2026-04-15 | 9 | $87.79 | $790.11 |
| 2026-04-13 | 149,576 | $83.00 | $12.4M |
| 2026-04-10 | 33,353 | $89.81 | $3.0M |
| 2026-04-07 | 21 | $102.42 | $2,150.82 |
| 2026-04-06 | 68 | $102.00 | $6,936 |
| 2026-04-02 | 15 | $104.04 | $1,560.6 |
| 2026-04-01 | 2 | $104.55 | $209.1 |
| 2026-03-31 | 380 | $104.97 | $39,888.6 |
| 2026-03-27 | 537 | $103.64 | $55,654.68 |
| 2026-03-25 | 178 | $104.65 | $18,627.7 |
| 2026-03-17 | 149,888 | $114.88 | $17.2M |
| 2026-03-09 | 2,577 | $124.34 | $320,424.18 |
| 2026-03-06 | 40 | $120.38 | $4,815.2 |
| 2026-03-04 | 19,218 | $113.19 | $2.2M |
| 2026-03-03 | 4,680 | $109.42 | $512,085.6 |
| 2026-03-02 | 1,569 | $108.01 | $169,467.69 |
| 2026-02-23 | 5,865 | $104.27 | $611,543.55 |
| 2026-02-18 | 55 | $105.91 | $5,825.05 |
| 2026-02-17 | 8,302 | $107.08 | $888,978.16 |
| 2026-02-13 | 20,959 | $103.29 | $2.2M |
| 2026-02-12 | 24,457 | $100.58 | $2.5M |
| 2026-02-06 | 70 | $102.63 | $7,184.1 |
| 2026-02-05 | 580 | $111.07 | $64,420.6 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| CRM | 0.728 | 0.741 | High co-movement |
| WDAY | 0.633 | 0.702 | Moderate |
| INTU | 0.629 | 0.716 | Moderate |
| ZS | 0.608 | 0.636 | Moderate |
| ADSK | 0.595 | 0.648 | Moderate |
| ADBE | 0.590 | 0.678 | Moderate |
| TENB | 0.576 | 0.623 | Moderate |
| PANW | 0.576 | 0.609 | Moderate |
| CRWD | 0.574 | 0.605 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare NOW to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.