Nextpower Inc. (NXT)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 40.6x earnings — a 38% discount to the sector average of 65.0x — NXT is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 7.7. DCF fair value of $156 implies 40% upside from current prices based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedNextpower Inc. demonstrates robust fundamental economics, characterized by a high Return on Invested Capital of 24.2% and an ROE of 31.3%, driven primarily by strong operating leverage rather than excessive debt or asset inefficiency. The DuPont decomposition reveals that the equity multiplier contributes minimally to returns compared to its net margin of 17.2% and solid asset turnover of 0.93x, while a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and Altman Z-Score of 8.4 suggest stable financial health with low distress risk. However, the Beneish M-Score of -2.43 indicates minimal earnings manipulation concerns, yet the Profitability Factor alpha of -0.157 signals that recent profitability trends are underperforming relative to sector peers despite the high historical margins.
Valuation metrics present a dichotomy between current market pricing and intrinsic value models. The stock trades at 28.8x forward earnings, significantly below the technology sector average of 56.8x, suggesting potential mean reversion opportunities or specific idiosyncratic risks not priced into the multiple. A discounted cash flow analysis implies a fair value of $156 with an upside of 29.5%, assuming a long-term free cash flow growth rate of 11.2%. This valuation gap indicates that while the market may be pricing in conservative near-term execution, the model assumes sustained high-growth trajectories over the next decade.
Risk and reward profiles reveal conflicting signals regarding future performance drivers. The stock exhibits substantial momentum with an annual Fama-French alpha of 44.02%, yet this is counterbalanced by a negative Value Factor (-0.203) confirming its growth tilt, alongside weak recent profitability trends reflected in the RMW factor. Most notably, significant insider activity over the last 90 days shows $11.3 million in net selling, which may warrant scrutiny given the company's otherwise strong balance sheet metrics and valuation discount relative to peers.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 18% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $190 | $140 | $111 |
| 3% | $222 | $156 | $120 |
| 4% | $270 | $177 | $131 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $152.22.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $156 (+40.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 73% above its 5-year average P/E of 16.7x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like IWO or MDYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NXT shares regardless of Nextpower Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.2B of passive capital is structurally linked to NXT through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Nextpower Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Nextpower Inc. (NXT) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies FLEX LTD (FLEX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with NXT. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 23 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
NXT Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 8 NXT shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Nextpower Inc. (NXT) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 0.8% of the IWO (IWO) and 0.7% of the MDYG (MDYG). Across 22 tracked ETFs, approximately 20M shares (13.0% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest NXT Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 22 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
NXT Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Nextpower Inc. over the past year sits near $87.91 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $152.22 trades 73.2% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (12% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
NXT Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Nextpower Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Nextpower Inc. converts 92% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 4 | $136.37 | $545.48 |
| 2026-05-13 | 2,446 | $125.37 | $306,655.02 |
| 2026-05-12 | 3,304 | $126.26 | $417,163.04 |
| 2026-05-08 | 3,321 | $120.86 | $401,376.06 |
| 2026-05-04 | 1,145 | $119.93 | $137,319.85 |
| 2026-04-30 | 4,137 | $114.27 | $472,734.99 |
| 2026-04-28 | 18,447 | $122.58 | $2.3M |
| 2026-04-24 | 16,922 | $124.36 | $2.1M |
| 2026-04-09 | 277 | $116.41 | $32,245.57 |
| 2026-04-08 | 578 | $109.18 | $63,106.04 |
| 2026-04-01 | 2,908 | $120.55 | $350,559.4 |
| 2026-03-26 | 29,257 | $130.42 | $3.8M |
| 2026-03-24 | 12 | $116.91 | $1,402.92 |
| 2026-03-23 | 4,275 | $114.39 | $489,017.25 |
| 2026-03-17 | 86 | $118.09 | $10,155.74 |
| 2026-03-12 | 4,961 | $116.69 | $578,899.09 |
| 2026-03-09 | 17,052 | $101.43 | $1.7M |
| 2026-02-27 | 6,573 | $106.86 | $702,390.78 |
| 2026-02-25 | 1,290 | $120.58 | $155,548.2 |
| 2026-02-23 | 568 | $119.34 | $67,785.12 |
| 2026-02-19 | 10,995 | $124.49 | $1.4M |
| 2026-02-17 | 386 | $116.44 | $44,945.84 |
| 2026-02-09 | 838 | $121.37 | $101,708.06 |
| 2026-02-06 | 2,694 | $114.44 | $308,301.36 |
| 2026-02-05 | 37,594 | $116.72 | $4.4M |
| 2026-02-02 | 7,929 | $117.09 | $928,406.61 |
| 2026-01-30 | 7,103 | $121.08 | $860,031.24 |
| 2026-01-29 | 39,907 | $119.97 | $4.8M |
| 2026-01-28 | 328 | $105.91 | $34,738.48 |
| 2026-01-27 | 154 | $107.28 | $16,521.12 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| FSLR | 0.533 | 0.518 | Moderate |
| VRT | 0.440 | 0.559 | Moderate |
| EME | 0.431 | 0.546 | Moderate |
| ETN | 0.428 | 0.543 | Moderate |
| CAT | 0.413 | 0.493 | Moderate |
| STX | 0.409 | 0.535 | Moderate |
| PWR | 0.406 | 0.486 | Moderate |
| TSM | 0.405 | 0.518 | Moderate |
| WDC | 0.400 | 0.527 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare NXT to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.